Jump to content

swstephe

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by swstephe

  1. 7 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

    What if the rule was something like making students use the bathroom that conforms to one's biology rather than their preferred gender?  It applies here, as I don't think the Hadith recognizes gender identity, so if a genetic woman, preferred man walks into the same bathroom as this student, he would be violating his religion. 

    I have a related funny story.  A film crew was making an episode of a local TV police drama.  One scene called for a party with both men and women.  The religious censors said they couldn't film men and women together who weren't married.  Someone I know, ran out and came back with half a dozen transgendered women.  They got to film the scene and it went out on national TV.  I suspect the religious censors realized that if they objected, it would be tantamount to an admission that there is a such thing as a transgendered woman and that they could potentially marry a man at that "party".  I've found a lot of strict rules end up stuck in a paradox like that.

     

    It is a complex subject though.  Look up the term "mukhannath", which seems to justify gender identity, even in some very strict cultures.

  2. I was once on a flight out of Bangkok.  They asked me to switch seats with a woman who had been placed next to a Buddhist monk.  They said it would violate his religious vows if he accidentally brushed up against her while leaving his seat.  I didn't mind, as an American I support freedom for people to practice their religion no matter what my personal beliefs on the matter were.  I don't see how this rule in Australia or the hadith harms anyone.

  3. President Obama raised the use of Executive Orders to an unprecedented level.

    President Trump will rescind many of those Executive Orders . . . and issue new ones to his liking.

    President Trump can do almost anything he wants regarding immigration, by Executive Order.

    There doesn't have to be months of hearings, etc., by Congress.

    One signature and it's effective immediately.

    You can blame President Obama for this, because he set the tone for ignoring Congress.

    Fact check. It definitely wasn't unprecedented. Obama's current total is 235, or about 31 per year, which means his presidency had the lowest number of executive orders, per year, since Grover Cleveland.

    (and old chart from 2014)

    executive-orders-over-the-years2.png

  4. Well, I have a dual citizenship with the United Kingdom and Hong Kong, and I have put both of my nationalities down on my DS260 form. Do you think that they might not approve me because I have a citizenship with an European country? I'm asking out of curisity, and not in a way to oppose to what you're saying. I'm just really worried.

    Like I said, I have no idea. My brother had dual citizenship, a child of US military born in the UK, but the US didn't recognize dual citizenship, so he was told he had to choose one. He chose US to avoid conscription, (he didn't realize it had already been abolished), then ended up being a reservist in the military anyway. I think you are much better off than us. We are Muslims and my fiance comes from a country with terrorists. It could be anything from "nothing" to "internment camps", (like they did to the Japanese), depending on who you listen to.

  5. Hey. I'm an Indian Citizen and husband is a LPR. Even though I'm a Hindu and all the paperwork is legal, I'm scared too. My file is just two months away from being current. And now, I'm going crazy thinking what's gonna happen next. At this stage, I'll suggest staying calm. Don't worry. Atleast not yet. :) We'll get through this.

    You might actually safe in this case. Apparently, Trump has no problem at all with Hindu immigrants.

  6. I've been doing some research into the question myself. Maybe someone with more legal information can correct me, but so far it looks like Trump can definitely block visas for entire classes of people due to the McCarren-Walter Act:

    Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 states: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

    Most of the recent presidents have used this law to ban visas for classes of people, Bill Clinton banned members of the Haitian military, Obama used it to ban people on the UN travel ban and those falling under financial criminal acts. The real problem was that Trump first said he would ban all Muslims, (which raised questions about a religious test), then he said any territory with terrorist events, (which would potentially ban people from Europe and Australia as well). Just the last few days, the statement about banning Muslims has been taken down from the website.

    So, right now, I really don't know what the future will hold. I don't want to bet on anyone breaking their campaign promises, so I'll keep my options open.

  7. Beautiful love story! Your story is proof that things like these do happen in real life (not only in movies!). Does that tiny country in Borneo happen to be Brunei by any chance? Anyways, congratulations on meeting the love of your life (finally!) and on your marriage :)

    Yes, it was Brunei, (a very short list of candidates). And with a population of 300k, it is likely we know some people in common.

×
×
  • Create New...