Waiting for a NOA2 from CSC for your I-129F?

[Igor&Elina 0]

Hmmm... Interesting. I see a bug in my list. Lynn & Tony are not on it because they don't have a sent date. I'll need to fix that.

Oh you'll never hear the end of it from StP now!

OK, it's fixed now.

Sorry Mox, but that pushed you down the list by 3.

[Igor&Elina 0]

Sorry Mox, but that pushed you down the list by 3.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo...............!!!!!!!!!!!

Aaaww!! Don't cry, it's only 3, not that bad really.

Come to think of it, StP's list is probably suffering from the same flaw , but in reverse. There are timelines in the database that have sent dates, noa2 dates, but not noa1 dates. Stands to reason that there will be timelines like that still waiting for noa2. Although there aren't as many of them as in the case of the flaw that I had with my list.

[Jeraly 4]

Ok - here's to a good week for CSC!!!

[Igor&Elina 0]

Ok - here's to a good week for CSC!!!

I'll second that! Go CSC!!!

[Igor&Elina 0]

My GOD!!! Some people really don't bother to update their timelines!

Check out this person's timeline and posts and you'll see what I mean.

[Jeraly 4]

Yeah there are a few like that - check out the July spreadsheet and anyone with italicised/struckout text is inactive/hasn't updated timeline - it is quite shocking!!!

[Eli the Barrowboy 16]

Yes, here's to a great week for CSC. Now I'm off to a brewery for the morning ... and getting paid for it, if 'paid' isn't to grandiose a word for my pitiful salary!!!

R

[Jeraly 4]

I dunno - I wouldn't be complaining at getting paid to go to a brewery... I could really go for some hair of the dog right now

[Jeraly 4]

Hrmmm I still maintain that inactive profiles should be deleted... it would make the data much more accurate...

[Jeraly 4]

Yeah but something needs to be done so the information and data is more reliable... I mean I don't think it is all that bad as it is really but still - I am thinking about your projected date - if that is based on someone from 2005 who still hasn't put in their NOA2 date it can't be doing anyone any favours!!!

[Jeraly 4]

Yes - I think *everyone* has had that!!! It's pretty funny

[TBoneTX 48,232]

This morning I came in to work, opened my email, and there's an email from CRIS. HOLY #######!! My heart practically leapt out of my chest. And then I read the Subject line: "USCIS Change Password Notification." Duuuuuhhhh...oh yeah. I changed it last night because...um...I forgot my password.

Do not pass Word, do not collect NOA2000 dollars.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Just remember, that my timeline for instance looks inactive because I have no NOA1 but i'm still here waiting and there may be one or two others in the same boat. I'm around day 140 with no NOA1 and on day 14 since my second petition was sent. I do realise something though now, if USCIS loses your petition and you request that they honor your original date there is a very good legal reason why they need to.

For instance, lets say your on a visa (even k1) and adjust status. While waiting for a receipt for your AOS your visa expires, then you discover 120 days later that your case file was lost and never receipted. Well if they didnt recognise your original file date then you'd be out of status when you reapply and lmay be denied. Which means that the USCIS mistake could cost you everything.

I think the few people in my place that did not get their dates honored were do to the fact that their lawyers apparently sent the package out identical to the first making USCIS assume that it was their first time applying. And once they receipt it, apparently its hard to argue dates.

[Jeraly 4]

Just remember, that my timeline for instance looks inactive because I have no NOA1 but i'm still here waiting and there may be one or two others in the same boat.

Yeah but you wouldn't be considered "inactive" because you actively login to VJ. If I were designing an inactivity system, I'd consider anyone that hasn't logged in within the last 90 days to be inactive. I wouldn't remove their profile or timeline, but I wouldn't use their timeline to compute stats. I'd also make it an option to exclude "inactive" members when generating timeline lookups/searches.

As for members who *do* login but don't update their timeline, I don't have a solution for that. There are some people who just aren't going to play ball, and I guess that's their choice. Fortunately I think it's a pretty small group of people that choose that route, so it's not too bad. But I suspect that timeline abandoners skew the timelines noticeably.

What I was going to say!! People who haven't logged onto VJ in 90 days should have their timelines removed from the data that provides us with the projected timelines

Now who can explain all this in a coherent manner so someone can make the suggestion to Ewok/post on the suggestions forum

[u2rsobad 0]

Approved!!!!!!!!!!!!!

His interview was yesterday (the 28th there)...after about a 3 min interview, she wished us a happy life together and told him good luck! So if anyone heard shouting coming from Vancouver, WA yesterday afternoon...it was me!!!! I'm so happy I can hardly stand it!

Thanks to all of my friends here on VJ for your endless support and advice. I appreciate all of you more than words could ever say.

Sandi