DS 260 Question-Immigration Law Violations (Seeking Clarity/Assistance on how to respond)

[s007rrt 7]

Under the Immigration Violation section, the question  summarized asked if you ever sought to obtain a visa by fraud or misrepresentation...yes or no with space for explanation.  This is the situation-Beneficiary was removed from USA at entry from airport, during interview it was discussed about his security. Visa application was completed by employer, visa approved at interview and no questions were asked about his background. However, from the airport denial this resulted in a 5 yr ban and visa revoked. Beneficiary was not charged with misrepresentation however it was stated he was inadmissible due to inconsistent statements and not enough funds. 235(b)1.....212a (7)(A)(i)(I)

Transcript discusses this issue-Employer completed visa. Consular office in JA did not ask about background. Beneficiary incorrectly assumed that background questions were related to Cayman Island (where he lived) and not JA. Final determination did not include being charged with misrep at determination of inadmissibility/removal proceedings at airport.
 

Should this question be answered with Yes and brief explanation  as provided here or any other thoughts

Thank you.

[USS_Voyager 1,971]

4 minutes ago, s007rrt said:

Under the Immigration Violation section, the question  summarized asked if you ever sought to obtain a visa by fraud or misrepresentation...yes or no with space for explanation.  This is the situation-Beneficiary was removed from USA at entry from airport, during interview it was discussed about his security. Visa application was completed by employer, visa approved at interview and no questions were asked about his background. However, from the airport denial this resulted in a 5 yr ban and visa revoked. Beneficiary was not charged with misrepresentation however it was stated he was inadmissible due to inconsistent statements and not enough funds. 235(b)1.....212a (7)(A)(i)(I)

Transcript discusses this issue-Employer completed visa. Consular office in JA did not ask about background. Beneficiary incorrectly assumed that background questions were related to Cayman Island (where he lived) and not JA. Final determination did not include being charged with misrep at determination of inadmissibility/removal proceedings at airport.
 

Should this question be answered with Yes and brief explanation  as provided here or any other thoughts

Thank you.

Sounds complicated. I would get a lawyer. This is probably not a DIY type case. 

[Nitas_man 3,100]

20 minutes ago, s007rrt said:

Under the Immigration Violation section, the question  summarized asked if you ever sought to obtain a visa by fraud or misrepresentation...yes or no with space for explanation.  This is the situation-Beneficiary was removed from USA at entry from airport, during interview it was discussed about his security. Visa application was completed by employer, visa approved at interview and no questions were asked about his background. However, from the airport denial this resulted in a 5 yr ban and visa revoked. Beneficiary was not charged with misrepresentation however it was stated he was inadmissible due to inconsistent statements and not enough funds. 235(b)1.....212a (7)(A)(i)(I)

Transcript discusses this issue-Employer completed visa. Consular office in JA did not ask about background. Beneficiary incorrectly assumed that background questions were related to Cayman Island (where he lived) and not JA. Final determination did not include being charged with misrep at determination of inadmissibility/removal proceedings at airport.
 

Should this question be answered with Yes and brief explanation  as provided here or any other thoughts

Thank you.

This is a potential land mine of legal interpretation.  Consult an attorney.