Jump to content

23 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Guccifer 2.0, the “lone hacker” who took credit for providing WikiLeaks with stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, was in fact an officer of Russia’s military intelligence directorate (GRU), The Daily Beast has learned. It’s an attribution that resulted from a fleeting but critical slip-up in GRU tradecraft. 

That forensic determination has substantial implications for the criminal probe into potential collusion between President Donald Trump and Russia. The Daily Beast has learned that the special counsel in that investigation, Robert Mueller, has taken over the probe into Guccifer and brought the FBI agents who worked to track the persona onto his team. 

While it’s unclear what Mueller plans to do with Guccifer, his last round of indictmentscharged 13 Russians tied to the Internet Research Agency troll farm with a conspiracy “for the purpose of interfering with the U.S. political and electoral processes, including the presidential election of 2016.” It was Mueller’s first move establishing Russian interference in the election within a criminal context, but it stopped short of directly implicating the Putin regime.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

https://www.thedailybeast.com/exclusive-lone-dnc-hacker-guccifer-20-slipped-up-and-revealed-he-was-a-russian-intelligence-officer

Guccifer was cited as evidence by Roger Stone that the Russians didn't hack the DNC.

Roger's turn in the barrel.

wonder what Rosenstein will talk about tomorrow ...

Posted
Quote

Trump’s longtime political adviser Roger Stone admitted being in touch with Guccifer over Twitter’s direct messaging service. And in August 2016, Stone published an article on the pro-Trump-friendly Breitbart News calling on his political opponents to “Stop Blaming Russia” for the hack. “I have some news for Hillary and Democrats—I think I’ve got the real culprit,” he wrote. “It doesn’t seem to be the Russians that hacked the DNC, but instead a hacker who goes by the name of Guccifer 2.0.”

well ain't that something.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

So what is worse: Roger Stone and hence the Trump team didn't know Guccifer was a Russian Spy master manipulating the campaign OR they did know they were being played and they didn't care?  No good options here.

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

So what is worse: Roger Stone and hence the Trump team didn't know Guccifer was a Russian Spy master manipulating the campaign OR they did know they were being played and they didn't care?  No good options here.

For Trump the "better" option will be to claim ignorance.

 

It fits with his overall ability and our expectations of him, so it is a convincing excuse. It also likely will protect him from significant consequences.

Posted

Lets ignore the fact that the data was transferred from the server at speeds faster than what would be possible over an internet connection which suggests the data was directly transferred to a storage device fron the server. Let's also ignore the fact that the DNC refuses to this day to allow the FBI to examine the servers. The leftist narrative on this just doesn't hold up to the facts. But it's your story. Make it as big as you want.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Posted
Just now, jg121783 said:

Lets ignore the fact that the data was transferred from the server at speeds faster than what would be possible over an internet connection which suggests the data was directly transferred to a storage device fron the server. Let's also ignore the fact that the DNC refuses to this day to allow the FBI to examine the servers. The leftist narrative on this just doesn't hold up to the facts. But it's your story. Make it as big as you want.

you seem to be ignoring quite a lot. 

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/346468-why-the-latest-theory-about-the-dnc-not-being-a-hack-is-probably-wrong

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
29 minutes ago, bcking said:

For Trump the "better" option will be to claim ignorance.

 

It fits with his overall ability and our expectations of him, so it is a convincing excuse. It also likely will protect him from significant consequences.

I gave you a thanks on this, terribly conflicted because it makes me laugh an cry at the same time at recognizing the truth of the statement.

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Posted
46 minutes ago, bcking said:

For Trump the "better" option will be to claim ignorance.

 

It fits with his overall ability and our expectations of him, so it is a convincing excuse. It also likely will protect him from significant consequences.

Because as we have learned from the FBI, extremely careless is a defense.

Posted
37 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

I still think in order to have colluded with a foreign agent you had to have known you were colluding with a foreign agent.

 

So the important question will be "who knew?". As the article states, the fact that Russia was manipulating the election has already been pretty much accepted in all intelligence circles. The question is who was duped, and who was knowingly using their influence. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, bcking said:

I still think in order to have colluded with a foreign agent you had to have known you were colluding with a foreign agent.

 

So the important question will be "who knew?". As the article states, the fact that Russia was manipulating the election has already been pretty much accepted in all intelligence circles. The question is who was duped, and who was knowingly using their influence. 

 as concerns trump knowing or just getting duped well..."the lady doth protest too much methinks" my opinion, of course.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...