Former Trump girlfriend hits back at 'upsetting' NYT cover story

[Jacque67 7,328]

Dream on,,,,the world is laughing.

[smilesammich 10,727]

What has been proven that it was a made up hit piece .. full of lies.... People Magazine really played up the negative spin on this story which caused lots of negative comments.....Clinton spin machine is working full time .

Just backfired big time . NYT is just full of lies ... this extends to every story they publish.......

what in god's name would we do without fox news to set the record straight??

[yuna628 9,914]

What has been proven that it was a made up hit piece .. full of lies.... People Magazine really played up the negative spin on this story which caused lots of negative comments.....Clinton spin machine is working full time .

Just backfired big time . NYT is just full of lies ... this extends to every story they publish.......

Now LiB, reading comprehension really comes into play here. Nothing in the NYT's article is made up or full of lies. It's the women's words against.. well Trump.

Ms Brewer does NOT dispute the things she said in the Times, but Trump does dispute the things she said (though will not actively come out and say what about her claims he does dispute). Ms Brewer, stands by the events she described to the Times, what she has currently had a ''change of heart'' about, is how the author of the Times article felt those events were demeaning to a woman. The article never states that Ms Brewer found the event demeaning personally either. In other words, Ms Brewer merely disputes the conclusions about Trump the author draws from the interviews in the piece.

On top of that there are numerous women who have made statements about Trump's demeaning behavior to them. None of them have had a ''sudden change of heart'' yet, nor is Trump disputing their claims, though I eagerly await this to happen.

Edited May 16, 2016 by yuna628

[Rob L 3,811]

Now LiB, reading comprehension really comes into play here. Nothing in the NYT's article is made up or full of lies. It's the women's words against.. well Trump.

Ms Brewer does NOT dispute the things she said in the Times, but Trump does dispute the things she said (though will not actively come out and say what about her claims he does dispute). Ms Brewer, stands by the events she described to the Times, what she has currently had a ''change of heart'' about, is how the author of the Times article felt those events were demeaning to a woman. The article never states that Ms Brewer found the event demeaning personally either. In other words, Ms Brewer merely disputes the conclusions about Trump the author draws from the interviews in the piece.

On top of that there are numerous women who have made statements about Trump's demeaning behavior to them. None of them have had a ''sudden change of heart'' yet, nor is Trump disputing their claims, though I eagerly await this to happen.

We should not even let anyone under the age of 15 to watch the his speeches and debates based on the malevolent filth that flows out of his mouth ("Is it true? I don't know I just saw it on the internet"), we don't really need the other 49 women to come on to say that they did not really mean to say all of those things that they said...we can see it in his words

W only need to watch videos of his public statements where he has referred to women as pigs, ugly, with blood flowing out of you know where , a Bimbo ( Megan Kelly) , “Like you wouldn’t have your job if you weren’t beautiful.”, that she has ‘The Face of a Dog!’ , The Cher is “Cher is somewhat of a loser. She’s lonely. She’s unhappy. She’s very miserable.”, that “All of the women on ‘The Apprentice’ flirted with me — consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected", “That must be a pretty picture, you dropping to your knees,”,

But don't worry He is “going to be really good for women.”“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ###.” — from an interview with Esquire, 1991

[OriZ 3,165]

Really, who cares?

I'm not for Trump I'm not against Trump I just don't care. I don't care because it doesn't matter because they all suck. I don't care because we all seem to forget there used to be a president that got a bj in the white house, and everyone at the time said "who cares?". All that mattered was the job he did or didn't do, depending on how you look at it. So honestly who cares?

Edited May 17, 2016 by OriZ

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

we all seem to forget there used to be a president that got a bj in the white house, and everyone at the time said "who cares?". All that mattered was the job he did or didn't do, depending on how you look at it. So honestly who cares?

Yep, everyone at the time said, "who cares?"

[OriZ 3,165]

Yep, everyone at the time said, "who cares?"

We both know that was BS and symbolic only, and I was talking about people as a whole...most didn't care, it was irrelevant to the job he does, and it is now, too.

[GandD 5,966]

The media exists as the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party.

Don't forget scientists and scholars. Them too.