Former K1 fiancées that didn’t marry my groom and left US.

[TracyTN 237]

I haven't seen any censorship yet on this board, no undue editing by the admins, and I wouldn't expect to see any since it would violate the marketplace-of-ideas concept that is the bedrock of both America and the internet generally.

And because we have only one admin.

[DA BOMB 1]

Nothing you said there makes sense. I didn't call him a rat, that I can recall, but if others did, I don't question their sincere concern for this girl getting mixed up with a guy who - from her own posts - didn't inform her of PAST MARRIAGES which were also to non-USCs. I think that's a serious omission on his part. Again, based on the information she provided.

And a question on whether or not to tell the truth on government forms? How would that NOT raise eyebrows. It's an innocent question from the OP, but since she also told us the USC had filed a petition before and BEEN MARRIED before, then we are going to naturally wonder why this guy doesn't know better already.

She made her relationship our business when she posted here in the way she did.

Again, if she's mature enough to consent to marriage, then she's mature enough to evaluate information and advice offered here and take or reject it as she sees fit. Or she can stop reading.

I haven't seen any censorship yet on this board, no undue editing by the admins, and I wouldn't expect to see any since it would violate the marketplace-of-ideas concept that is the bedrock of both America and the internet generally.

You said it yourself - "she also told us the USC had filed a petition before and BEEN MARRIED before" so - if we're going to call him a liar now..how did he NOT inform her of his prior marriages if she's the one that posted that prior marriage to us?

[Augustajim 0]

Forum; a public meeting place for open discussion

Former K1 fiancées that didn't marry my groom and left US., Should the officers know about them?

see the bold? Thats the op's title. That says 2 or more K1's. Plus the marriage to the other that may not be divorced. I really do not feel unjustified in my comments.

As well please notice what a forum is. If the definition of a discussion is limited to only the begining topic of conversation how would we as a society have ever progressed? Would we still be developing the first idea that our conscious minds ever came up with because we were required to stay on subject?

Edited February 26, 2007 by Augustajim

[DA BOMB 1]

Forum; a public meeting place for open discussion

Former K1 fiancées that didn't marry my groom and left US., Should the officers know about them?

see the bold? Thats the op's title. That says 2 or more K1's. Plus the marriage to the other that may not be divorced. I really do not feel unjustified in my comments.

As well please notice what a forum is. If the definition of a discussion is limited to only the begining topic of conversation how would we as a society have ever progressed? Would we still be developing the first idea that our conscious minds ever came up with because we were required to stay on subject?

Ok August...guess you're free to call everyone you disagree with a rat. Have at it! After all its a FORUM and we wouldnt want to stop progress of the human species.

[Augustajim 0]

I never disagreed with the fiance that I called a Rat. The only people I am disagreeing with are the ones that think he is on the level. I regret the usage of the word Rat as it does seem to be name calling. I do not however disagree with my perceptions of the USC. If your going to call me out please at least be correct in you acusations.

Forum; a public meeting place for open discussion

Former K1 fiancées that didn't marry my groom and left US., Should the officers know about them?

see the bold? Thats the op's title. That says 2 or more K1's. Plus the marriage to the other that may not be divorced. I really do not feel unjustified in my comments.

As well please notice what a forum is. If the definition of a discussion is limited to only the begining topic of conversation how would we as a society have ever progressed? Would we still be developing the first idea that our conscious minds ever came up with because we were required to stay on subject?

Ok August...guess you're free to call everyone you disagree with a rat. Have at it! After all its a FORUM and we wouldnt want to stop progress of the human species.

[TimsDaisy 0]

BillyBong - she told us about the marriage AFTER she went back and asked her fiance to clarify - meaning she JUST LEARNED of his prior marriage and it wasn't discussed before she started researching the effects of his prior K1 visa attempt.

[Augustajim 0]

ladies and Gentlemen, your attention please. Has anybody looked at the OP's name?

Coleopter666

broke down

Coleoptera, a bettle with two sets of wings making up 350,000 species

666, sign of the beast

i do believe we have all been had. or she in a bug guru

[heishe 2]

Stop fighting, boys and girls.

[DA BOMB 1]

ladies and Gentlemen, your attention please. Has anybody looked at the OP's name?

Coleopter666

broke down

Coleoptera, a bettle with two sets of wings making up 350,000 species

666, sign of the beast

i do believe we have all been had. or she in a bug guru

"I never disagreed with the fiance that I called a Rat. The only people I am disagreeing with are the ones that think he is on the level. I regret the usage of the word Rat as it does seem to be name calling. I do not however disagree with my perceptions of the USC. If your going to call me out please at least be correct in you acusations."

Now you're going to personally attack the OP. Nice. Real nice. Let me be REAL correct in my accusation - YOU (being the name caller) HAVE NO PLACE INSULTING OTHERS ON THIS BOARD. You regret calling her fiance a rat so instead pick apart her nick and go straight to the source to insult HER. This, my friends, is the reason I was so fired up.

[TracyTN 237]

ladies and Gentlemen, your attention please. Has anybody looked at the OP's name?

Coleopter666

broke down

Coleoptera, a bettle with two sets of wings making up 350,000 species

666, sign of the beast

i do believe we have all been had. or she in a bug guru

"I never disagreed with the fiance that I called a Rat. The only people I am disagreeing with are the ones that think he is on the level. I regret the usage of the word Rat as it does seem to be name calling. I do not however disagree with my perceptions of the USC. If your going to call me out please at least be correct in you acusations."

Now you're going to personally attack the OP. Nice. Real nice. Let me be REAL correct in my accusation - YOU (being the name caller) HAVE NO PLACE INSULTING OTHERS ON THIS BOARD. You regret calling her fiance a rat so instead pick apart her nick and go straight to the source to insult HER. This, my friends, is the reason I was so fired up.

WHERE did Jim call the OP a rat?

And at the end of the day - does any of this arguing and 'I'm right, you're wrong' help the OP?

[DA BOMB 1]

BillyBong - she told us about the marriage AFTER she went back and asked her fiance to clarify - meaning she JUST LEARNED of his prior marriage and it wasn't discussed before she started researching the effects of his prior K1 visa attempt.

Being that she's probably freaked right off the site we'll never know if she actually knew of his prior marriage as she refered to both as fiances. Based on the posts alone I stand corrected.

[Augustajim 0]

ummmmm I did call her man a Rat. I was wrong in that.

ladies and Gentlemen, your attention please. Has anybody looked at the OP's name?

Coleopter666

broke down

Coleoptera, a bettle with two sets of wings making up 350,000 species

666, sign of the beast

i do believe we have all been had. or she in a bug guru

"I never disagreed with the fiance that I called a Rat. The only people I am disagreeing with are the ones that think he is on the level. I regret the usage of the word Rat as it does seem to be name calling. I do not however disagree with my perceptions of the USC. If your going to call me out please at least be correct in you acusations."

Now you're going to personally attack the OP. Nice. Real nice. Let me be REAL correct in my accusation - YOU (being the name caller) HAVE NO PLACE INSULTING OTHERS ON THIS BOARD. You regret calling her fiance a rat so instead pick apart her nick and go straight to the source to insult HER. This, my friends, is the reason I was so fired up.

WHERE did Jim call the OP a rat?

And at the end of the day - does any of this arguing and 'I'm right, you're wrong' help the OP?

[TracyTN 237]

Yes, Jim, you called 'her man' a rat - not her. MRSBILLYBONG said you shouldn't insult those on the board. To my knowledge, the OPs fiance is not on the board.

[Augustajim 0]

My point was.... it appears we are arguing on a topic that is a farse. I'm in no way picking on the OP! I think the OP's name suggests it's a strong possibility that we are being led on a wild goose chase, thats all.

ladies and Gentlemen, your attention please. Has anybody looked at the OP's name?

Coleopter666

broke down

Coleoptera, a bettle with two sets of wings making up 350,000 species

666, sign of the beast

i do believe we have all been had. or she in a bug guru

"I never disagreed with the fiance that I called a Rat. The only people I am disagreeing with are the ones that think he is on the level. I regret the usage of the word Rat as it does seem to be name calling. I do not however disagree with my perceptions of the USC. If your going to call me out please at least be correct in you acusations."

Now you're going to personally attack the OP. Nice. Real nice. Let me be REAL correct in my accusation - YOU (being the name caller) HAVE NO PLACE INSULTING OTHERS ON THIS BOARD. You regret calling her fiance a rat so instead pick apart her nick and go straight to the source to insult HER. This, my friends, is the reason I was so fired up.

[payxibka 10,048]

thanx yu'all for your help!! appreciate it!!!

The OP has not been seen on the board since shortly after her last post above..... I doubt she is yet "freaked off" the board. If and when she does come back, however..........