Jump to content

  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. Should there be a 51st state?

    • No. The status quo is perfectly fine.
    • Yes.
  2. 2. The 51st state should be...

    • Puerto Rico
    • Puerto Rico + USVI
    • Washington D.C.
    • The 51st state should be created by partitioning an existing state. For example, North Colorado.
    • Guam and other Pacific territories
      0
    • There should never be a 51st state.
  3. 3. If Puerto Rico became the 51st state, what do you see as the biggest challenge?

    • Widespread poverty on the island
    • Español‎
    • Poor state of PR's finances
    • It would be a Democratic state. To make it fair, we'd need a reliably Republican state to counterbalance (like North Colorado).


19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Make Puerto Rico the 51st state

By José M. Saldaña, DMD, MPH

Three consecutive U.S. presidents encouraged Puerto Rico to make a permanent decision about our political status. This was the case of the Task Force established by President Clinton to deal with our status issue. It was followed by both presidents Bush’s and Barack Obama's respective White House Reports on Puerto Rico Status in 2005, 2007 and 2011.

Bush’s 2007 Task Force Report on Puerto Rico clearly states on page 6: “the Department of justice concluded in 1959 that Puerto Rico remained a territory, and as noted above, the Supreme Court, while recognizing that Puerto Rico exercises substantial political autonomy under the current commonwealth system, has held that Puerto Rico remains fully subject to congressional authority under the Territory Clause.”

The most recent report, Obama’s Task Force on Puerto Rico’s Status, issued on March 11, 2011 is a very important contribution not only in terms of solving our political status but also in terms of improving our economy within the U.S. and the global reality. I quote from the report:

“This Task Force is further committed to moving resolution of the status issue forward in a meaningful way with the goal of resolving it on a short timetable. The recommendations set forth below are directed toward that end.”

To these effects Recommendation # 1 states: "The Task Force recommends that all relevant parties—the President, Congress, and the leadership and people of Puerto Rico—work to ensure that Puerto Ricans are able to express their will about status options and have that will acted upon by the end of 2012 or soon thereafter.”

On November 6, 2012 the people of Puerto Rico held a plebiscite to make a decision on the island’s status. The ballot consisted of two questions, and the results were as follows:

  • Do you agree that Puerto Rico should continue to have its present form of territorial status (Commonwealth)?
  • Yes: 46 percent
  • No: 54 percent
  • Irrespective of your answer to the first question, indicate which of the following non-territorial options you prefer.
  • Statehood: 61 percent
  • Independence: 5 percent
  • Sovereign Free Associated State: 33 percent

A majority of votes rejected the present colonial status, thus withdrawing the consent of the governed.

While the results of this plebiscite are clear and were immediately accepted and ratified by the White House, they were disputed by some leaders of the present colonial Commonwealth status. In order to dispel any doubts, in April 2013, President Obama proposed that $2.5 million be appropriated to the Justice Department to be assigned to the Puerto Rico Elections Commission for the purpose of resolving Puerto Rico's status problem by consulting its voters on one or more status options that are compatible with the Constitution, laws and public policy of the United States. This time the vote would be under federal auspices so that the results cannot be disputed by any of the political parties on the island.

We would endorse President Obama’s call for another plebiscite under federal auspices with the same two questions that were submitted to the voters on November 6. However, we would reject the inclusion of the current territorial, colonial status-Commonwealth- in any future plebiscite given that the current status has already been resoundingly rejected by a clear majority of the people of Puerto Rico and does not provide a permanent resolution to the status problem because it itself is the problem. We would also reject the inclusion of the “New or Developed Commonwealth” option proposed by local colonial leaders because according to all constitutional authorities this is not a constitutionally acceptable option.

President Bush’s 2007 Task Force Report on Puerto Rico clearly states on page 6: “The U. S. Constitution would not permit a “New Commonwealth” proposal because the land under US sovereignty must either be a State or a territory.”

Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner, Pedro Pierluisi, has introduced a bill in Congress - HR 2000- which should resolve our status predicament of being the oldest colony in the world.

It provides “for a federally authorized ratification vote in Puerto Rico on the admission of Puerto Rico into the Union as a State and if a majority of voters ratify Puerto Rico’s desire for statehood, to describe the steps that the President and Congress shall take to enable the admission of Puerto Rico as a State of the Union.”

Puerto Rico deserves to become the 51st State of the Union with the same rights and responsibilities than the rest of our fellow Americans. After all, we have been proud American citizens since 1917. We have significantly contributed in the defense of our Nation at home and abroad in all the major wars and foreign engagements. More than 200,000 of us have honorably served in the U.S. Armed Forces and have fought and died for our democratic way of life. Proportionately we have experienced more war casualties in all U.S. wars than any state of the union. And yet we are deprived of the most basic rights of citizenship in a representative democracy: The right to vote and the right to be represented in the political body that enacts the laws by which we must abide.

It would be a very unfair and undemocratic act of prejudice on the part of Congress and a national discredit to ignore the plight for equal rights of 3.7 million of American citizens.

It is time for Congress to act now.

Saldaña is the former president of the University of Puerto Rico.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/civil-rights/194994-make-puerto-rico-the-51st-state

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

AraJit - it's great you found an article and decided to post it.

However, whatcha know about PR from a $$ standpoint, corporate $$ standpoint?

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...