A New York Times commenter makes a compelling argument for why Obama SHOULD cave in to the crazies

[mota bhai 2,675]

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

There will be no default. And the president should not give in to the lunatics - that would be the worst of all outcomes. The sane have a huge majority in Congress and it is that sane majority that will rule over the insane

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

There will be no default. And the president should not give in to the lunatics - that would be the worst of all outcomes. The sane have a huge majority in Congress and it is that sane majority that will rule over the insane

For a split second, you sounded like Gary.

[Karee 4,190]

For a split second, you sounded like Gary.

[Darnell 8,478]

Obama? Crazies? What? huh?

[RGinWA 816]

To illustrate a point let them drive the car off the cliff. Then in the rubble that the economy will be the Republican party will be obliterated and the Tea Party will be pariah.

Then just maybe we can get something done around here.

[Novembro 1,763]

If he gives in to the crazies, a lot of this will start happening:

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

For a split second, you sounded like Gary.

Marv. Man, here Iturn around for one second and you do me wrong like that? #######?