Unpopular Obama:

[Leatherneck 693]

I wondered how long it would take a lib to disparage the dems in WV. The fact is, the guy won 10 counties/41% of the vote - that is an embarrassment to the WH.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I wondered how long it would take a lib to disparage the dems in WV. The fact is, the guy won 10 counties/41% of the vote - that is an embarrassment to the WH.

Had you paid any attention, you'd realize that the WH is completely unconcerned about WV. Whatever electoral votes WV has, they're going to whoever runs for the GOP. The WH is not even competing in WV - it would be wasted effort and wasted funds. Bottom line: hillbillies vote for Republicans or prisoners. Run a Republican prisoner and he'll win there. Simple as that.

[Pooky 3,343]

Had you paid any attention, you'd realize that the WH is completely unconcerned about WV. Whatever electoral votes WV has, they're going to whoever runs for the GOP. The WH is not even competing in WV - it would be wasted effort and wasted funds. Bottom line: hillbillies vote for Republicans or prisoners. Run a Republican prisoner and he'll win there. Simple as that.

But he wasn't running as a Republican.

And 41% is quite the protest vote. If Romney gets a lone no-mark (like Ron Paul) receiving 41% of the vote in a Democrat sure-thing state, you can bet it will be all over the news as a massive setback for him. And even Ron Paul is more credible than a convicted felon serving time.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

But he wasn't running as a Republican.

And 41% is quite the protest vote. If Romney gets a lone no-mark (like Ron Paul) receiving 41% of the vote in a Democrat sure-thing state, you can bet it will be all over the news as a massive setback for him. And even Ron Paul is more credible than a convicted felon serving time.

Who gives a rat's #### about Romney's performance in, say, California? He's not going to carry that state in November no matter how well or bad he does there in the primaries. Period. It's a non-issue.

[luckytxn 2,263]

Who gives a rat's #### about Romney's performance in, say, California? He's not going to carry that state in November no matter how well or bad he does there in the primaries. Period. It's a non-issue.

Just goes to show you what a sad state of affairs it is when even if Stalin or Hitler were to run as a Democrat in California that they would win.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Just goes to show you what a sad state of affairs it is when even if Stalin or Hitler were to run as a Democrat in California that they would win.

And if either were to run as the Republican in AL, MS, GA, TX, OK then they'd be elected, too. Even if they ran against Jesus himself - provided that Jesus was on the Democrat ticket.

Edited May 11, 2012 by Mr. Big Dog

[mawilson 2,133]

Who gives a rat's #### about Romney's performance in, say, California?

Or New York. The question is, why do wealthy Manhattanites disproportionately vote Democrat? It's clearly against their economic self-interest.