Same-Sex Marriage Amendment NY State

[Zero Sum 305]

Come on, ZO. Be honest enough to admit that you don't hesitate to antagonize, too, champ.

I do not deny it, nor is it mutually exclusive to other's behavior. Sometimes you reap what you sow- and when you behave like a jerk by being a bigot (not you), you deserve to get your backside marked red. No gay reference with that either.

[Krikit 1,163]

Come on, ZO. Be honest enough to admit that you don't hesitate to antagonize, too, champ.

One more like that and you're no longer a participant.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Come on, ZO. Be honest enough to admit that you don't hesitate to antagonize, too, champ.

That's all Zero does.

Edited June 29, 2011 by Why_Me

[^_^ 5,021]

That's all Zero does...she's a sock puppet that does nothing but stir it up when she see's a post she doesn't agree with. And when she gets a beat down she resorts to insults. Iv'e seen zero dum do this time and time again on threads here. Rude doesn't even begin to explain it.

Zero Sum is a man.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Zero Sum is a man.

wanna bet? Bet me.

[Zero Sum 305]

That's all Zero does...she's a sock puppet that does nothing but stir it up when she see's a post she doesn't agree with. And when she gets a beat down she resorts to insults. Iv'e seen zero dum do this time and time again on threads here. Rude doesn't even begin to explain it.

What you claim is the case. Notice such claims have gone quiet.

Your rush to post reactionary, inflammatory, and irrelevant language makes you skip keys, by the way.

[^_^ 5,021]

wanna bet? Bet me.

It's HAL.

[Zero Sum 305]

It's HAL.

Its Zero Sum.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

One more like that and you're no longer a participant.

What? I was only using it to remind him of his antagonism as he's accusing Why_Me of being antagonistic. You're the one that admonished him for it. Can't you tell the difference?

[^_^ 5,021]

Its Zero Sum.

Shut up, HAL. He's calling you a chick. Put down the freakin beaker and man up for once.

[Zero Sum 305]

What? I was only using it to remind him of his antagonism as he's accusing Why_Me of being antagonistic. You're the one that admonished him for it. Can't you tell the difference?

True, I don't think you should be admonished for this. And, in case you missed the post, I did not deny my justifiable antagonism based on his ludicrous opinions. He on the other hand is practicing strange reading comprehension, illogical conclusions based on nonsense, and diversionary, reactionary posting to perhaps cover up speculations that have been posted based on established psychology.

Shut up, HAL. He's calling you a chick. Put down the freakin beaker and man up for once.

I work in an office building downtown, man. I'm good with my feminine side. Pretty secure in my masculinity.

[^_^ 5,021]

True, I don't think you should be admonished for this. And, in case you missed the post, I did not deny my justifiable antagonism based on his ludicrous opinions. He on the other hand is practicing strange reading comprehension, illogical conclusions based on nonsense, and diversionary, reactionary posting to perhaps cover up speculations that have been posted based on established psychology.

CMON WHO THE FUKC BUT HAL WRITES LIKE THIS?

[Krikit 1,163]

What? I was only using it to remind him of his antagonism as he's accusing Why_Me of being antagonistic. You're the one that admonished him for it. Can't you tell the difference?

It was a two-edged sword.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Shut up, HAL. He's calling you a chick. Put down the freakin beaker and man up for once.

I like the new name, especially the Zero part

[^_^ 5,021]

I like the new name, especially the Zero part

Clever as always, I see.