What's with all this sex talk?

[tmma 467]

Of course it isn't all about me, I am not silly enough to think that it is but I haven't seen any threads in OT where people have given personal information of that nature of course I do not read every thread.

Perhaps you could let me know how you know what is in a thread you haven't read? That's a skill I do not have

Your attempt at appearing deliberatly obtuse is really quite amusing and does not suit you... but I will respond anyway.

Quite afew times there have been threads that are started about something quite unrelated to sexual preferences and the likes that somehow get morphed into certain posters own venue to advertise their sexuality.

As for the threads that are directly sexually related in the title or are obviously started with the sole intention of over the top descriptions or opinions, or intrusive questions and really unusual interest in others' sexual preferences ( as your latest polls are)- you would be right, I don't read those...because- unlike you--I am not interested in what others on here do in that respect.

Edited July 29, 2010 by tmma

[Peikko 1,575]

I call bullsh!t. But ok, I'll play along. Why do you care whether a man masturbates while he's away from his SO, and whether he watches porn, or doesn't? Like really, what value does that give you, AND would you ask that question to a bunch of men irl?

Call what you like, I had no idea. Perhaps they are American euphemisms, I do not know. I don't care about these things individually, I am INTERESTED in whether men are consistent and it was a direct follow up from points raised during one of the two 'conversational' threads. If you noticed, the poll was anonymous - that demonstrates that I had no voyeuristic intentions.

[Amby 490]

I have no clue what's going on here

[Peikko 1,575]

Your attempt at appearing deliberatly obtuse is really quite amusing and does not suit you... but I will play along and respond.

Quite afew times there have been threads that are started about something quite unrelated to sexual preferences and the likes that somehow get morphed into certain posters own venue to advertise their sexuality.

As for the threads that are directly sexually related in the title or are obviously started with the sole intention of over the top descriptions or opinions, or intrusive questions and really unusual interest in others' sexual preferences ( as your latest polls are)- you would be right, I don't read those...because- unlike you--I am not interested in what others on here do in that respect.

In other words, you can't.

I am not in the least bit obtuse - I am curious as to why some people are getting rather excited because they seem to believe that VJ OT has become a den of iniquity all because some other people are interested in the ethical questions and values that surround sexual relationships. I find it quite baffling really.

I have no clue what's going on here

Some people believe that I have an unhealthy interest in other people's 'goings on in the bedroom' based on 4 threads I posted in 2 days. Go figure.

[Darnell 8,479]

Why are you interested in how others view abortion? Ethics is fascinating.

You'd be better 'served' in yer pursuit of ethics, on a web portal that specialises in it. Seriously.

[Ban Hammer 14,293]

I have no clue what's going on here

it's life sex, jim, but not as we know it.

Edited July 29, 2010 by charles!

[^_^ 5,021]

I'm still waiting on you, Legacy, to teach me grammar. Where have you gone?

How can I take a stab at it? I got it wrong the first time. I can't. I wish to learn from you. Teach me. Tell me how you’d rewrite those sentences along with explanation of why they were wrong.

You swine! You have problem with legal immigrants bringing their loved ones to America legally? Or are you saying you have problem with English? Because then it would make sense. Your English is terrible.

Hint: You made the same mistake twice. And if you need another hint, look up missing article.

Ordinarily, I wouldn't care about your spelling or grammar. But you try so hard to come across as a superior douchebag.

Edited July 29, 2010 by Legacy member

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

You'd be better 'served' in yer pursuit of ethics, on a web portal that specialises in it. Seriously.

GOOD GRIEF!!! It's bleedin' OT! Ethics, sex, politics, food, TV, high culture, low culture is ALL fodder for discussion.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

I have no clue what's going on here

Oh Cleo's acting like she doesnt get off on talking to strangers about sex.

[tmma 467]

In other words, you can't. ......

Can't what?

I just explained in as clear terms as I can.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Can't what?

I just explained in as clear terms as I can.

Forgive her shes all worked up! Shes prolly sittin there in her snuggy gettin all cozy with the leg of the table.

Edited July 29, 2010 by Col. Lingus

[Peikko 1,575]

You'd be better 'served' in yer pursuit of ethics, on a web portal that specialises in it. Seriously.

You have a point, but then again, one could say, why have a VJ OT at all? I don't know what the fuss is about in the same way that I do not know what the fuss is about when people get all riled up about political threads. We are just people passing the time in ways that we find interesting. All of us.

[Amby 490]

Darnell I can't PM you

[^_^ 5,021]

You have a point, but then again, one could say, why have a VJ OT at all? I don't know what the fuss is about in the same way that I do not know what the fuss is about when people get all riled up about political threads. We are just people passing the time in ways that we find interesting. All of us.

Never mind Darnell, he is a PITA in political threads too

I think he wants Off Topic to be On Topic.

[HAL 9000 96]

I think this thread would benefit from more Latin.

odi et amo. quare id faciam, fortasse requiris?

nescio, sed fieri sentio et excrucior.

Excellent. Post those swim pics then.

That would be a somnium for some.