In response to the Rjo ewok thread.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

I was reading it and saw that my name was interjected via a busy body. You can all take a guess who I am talking about. (AJ) heh heh. I just got a few words for the poster boy. For one who puts more SPAM out there than anyone, other than Steve, surely deserves mention.

I would just like to say that ppl such as yourselves are rather narrow and shallow in your thinking. You can spam all fvcking day long? But yet throw others down for their way of posting? Judgemental punks such as yourselves should prolly speak or look in a mirror. The deflective tactics that you use are rather obvious to me and duly noted by others. I read the thread between RJO and Ewok. AJ just could not resist putting his worthless child like behaviour into it. A song is what you need and may you listen with ears wide fvckin OPEN!

KEEP DANCIN you lil PUKE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6r4KT8-VX0

[Ban Hammer 13,399]

in before the lock.......

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

in before the lock.......

You think its gonna get locked?

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

[Heracles 417]

Have you ever noticed that it's the old left leaning crew, the same crew that years ago would have got away with murder, that is now the one that bitches the most about the mods when they don't get their way.

[Niels Bohr 72]

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F444CELomo

Have you ever noticed that it's the old left leaning crew, the same crew that years ago would have got away with murder, that is now the one that bitches the most about the mods when they don't get their way.

Dude its on fvckin TRIAL right NOW!

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

[Otto 83]

..

Edited December 1, 2009 by Otto und Karin

[Niels Bohr 72]

[Peikko 1,575]

Responding with a video... hmm. Are you Marc?

The quote in question. Hardly slanderous, or even factually inacurate, so what got your panties in a wad marc?

Edited December 1, 2009 by Madame Cleo

[JVKn'CVO 11]

Saludos,

Caro

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Responding with a video... hmm. Are you Marc?

The quote in question. Hardly slanderous, or even factually inacurate, so what got your panties in a wad marc?

Aah, thank you. I was looking for that

[Peikko 1,575]

Responding with a video... hmm. Are you Marc?

The quote in question. Hardly slanderous, or even factually inacurate, so what got your panties in a wad marc?

Aah, thank you. I was looking for that

I had no idea marc was this sensitive, poor boy.

That thread was hilarious. I wish it wasn't locked because I wanted to ask why Ewok kept referring to Bshbrk as 'they'...very odd.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Responding with a video... hmm. Are you Marc?

The quote in question. Hardly slanderous, or even factually inacurate, so what got your panties in a wad marc?

Aah, thank you. I was looking for that

I had no idea marc was this sensitive, poor boy.

That thread was hilarious. I wish it wasn't locked because I wanted to ask why Ewok kept referring to Bshbrk as 'they'...very odd.

He does that a lot, not just with pushbrk. I suppose we all have our linguistic peculiarities.