Jump to content

6 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

We are very newbies. Not to the "system" so much as to this site. unfortunately, the internet has afforded us mostly with a lot of doom and gloom, "easy" Visa firms and lawyers. So we firmly believe the old addage, "If you believe everthing you read, maybe you shouldn't read".

We are confused on this site because it seems most are convinced that the CR-1 Visa is preferable to the K-3, but yet the histories shown indicate A LOT of time saved getting someone HERE by the K-3. And Anna in Uzbekistan and we not sure if consulate at Tashkent processing CR-1. Our goal is to be together asap. We are not concerned about costs and hassles once Anna gets here. Could we get some straight, correct answers on this? PUSHBRK, please respond!!

Anna and Mike :unsure:

Our Timeline:

02/xx/ 2008 - We meet

04/23/2008 - Meet in Moscow

05/15/2008 to 06/15/2008 Mike visit Tashkent and meeting my family

06/15/2008 to 08/15/2008 Not easy "easy visa"

09/11/2009 NOA1 for K-1

12/20/2008 Mike get back to Tashkent

12/30/2009 Married against all odds

01/14/2009 NOA2 for K-1

01/23/2009 K-1 refused marrige valid in USA and Uzbekistan

02/08/2009 Mike returnes to States

06/09/2009 I-130 petition sent to attorney

07/01/2009 NOA1 I-130

07/05/2009 I-129F submitted to attorney

08/05/2009 NOA1 I-129F

09/30/2009 RFE I-129F

10/28/2009 NOA2 for I-130 and I-129F

11/02/2009 USCIS admited mistake in I-130

11/04/2009 Case # from NVC for I-129F

11/04/2009 I-129F sent to Embassy at Tashkent

11/19/2009 K-3 package recived from US embassy at Tashkent

11/25/2009 Medical appointment

12/01/2009 Interview

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Posted

If you really want, file for both together. Then continue with whichever one seems to be processing faster.

The K3 might save you a week or two. But the IR1 has other advantages on arrival. However, if cost/working is not an issue for you, go ahead and file for the K3 and IR1/CR1.

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
We are very newbies. Not to the "system" so much as to this site. unfortunately, the internet has afforded us mostly with a lot of doom and gloom, "easy" Visa firms and lawyers. So we firmly believe the old addage, "If you believe everthing you read, maybe you shouldn't read".

We are confused on this site because it seems most are convinced that the CR-1 Visa is preferable to the K-3, but yet the histories shown indicate A LOT of time saved getting someone HERE by the K-3. And Anna in Uzbekistan and we not sure if consulate at Tashkent processing CR-1. Our goal is to be together asap. We are not concerned about costs and hassles once Anna gets here. Could we get some straight, correct answers on this? PUSHBRK, please respond!!

Anna and Mike :unsure:

If a consulate processes and issues K-3's it also issues CR-1's... both are done at a consulates IV unit.

History has shown that a K-3 is faster but history is a changing

YMMV

Posted
If you really want, file for both together. Then continue with whichever one seems to be processing faster.

The K3 might save you a week or two. But the IR1 has other advantages on arrival. However, if cost/working is not an issue for you, go ahead and file for the K3 and IR1/CR1.

Thanks alot :thumbs:

We are very newbies. Not to the "system" so much as to this site. unfortunately, the internet has afforded us mostly with a lot of doom and gloom, "easy" Visa firms and lawyers. So we firmly believe the old addage, "If you believe everthing you read, maybe you shouldn't read".

We are confused on this site because it seems most are convinced that the CR-1 Visa is preferable to the K-3, but yet the histories shown indicate A LOT of time saved getting someone HERE by the K-3. And Anna in Uzbekistan and we not sure if consulate at Tashkent processing CR-1. Our goal is to be together asap. We are not concerned about costs and hassles once Anna gets here. Could we get some straight, correct answers on this? PUSHBRK, please respond!!

Anna and Mike :unsure:

If a consulate processes and issues K-3's it also issues CR-1's... both are done at a consulates IV unit.

History has shown that a K-3 is faster but history is a changing

Is that basicly telling us GO AHEAD AND DO CR-1?

Our Timeline:

02/xx/ 2008 - We meet

04/23/2008 - Meet in Moscow

05/15/2008 to 06/15/2008 Mike visit Tashkent and meeting my family

06/15/2008 to 08/15/2008 Not easy "easy visa"

09/11/2009 NOA1 for K-1

12/20/2008 Mike get back to Tashkent

12/30/2009 Married against all odds

01/14/2009 NOA2 for K-1

01/23/2009 K-1 refused marrige valid in USA and Uzbekistan

02/08/2009 Mike returnes to States

06/09/2009 I-130 petition sent to attorney

07/01/2009 NOA1 I-130

07/05/2009 I-129F submitted to attorney

08/05/2009 NOA1 I-129F

09/30/2009 RFE I-129F

10/28/2009 NOA2 for I-130 and I-129F

11/02/2009 USCIS admited mistake in I-130

11/04/2009 Case # from NVC for I-129F

11/04/2009 I-129F sent to Embassy at Tashkent

11/19/2009 K-3 package recived from US embassy at Tashkent

11/25/2009 Medical appointment

12/01/2009 Interview

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

When we filed, K-3s were being approved 6-8 weeks after CR-1s. So you may save some time for the interview, but it seems like at the USCIS stage, the K-3 is detrimental to your timeline.

Go for the CR-1. Good luck

USCIS
August 12, 2008 - petition sent
August 16, 2008 - NOA-1
February 10, 2009 - NOA-2
178 DAYS FROM NOA-1


NVC
February 13, 2009 - NVC case number assigned
March 12, 2009 - Case Complete
25 DAY TRIP THROUGH NVC


Medical
May 4, 2009


Interview
May, 26, 2009


POE - June 20, 2009 Toronto - Atlanta, GA

Removal of Conditions
Filed - April 14, 2011
Biometrics - June 2, 2011 (early)
Approval - November 9, 2011
209 DAY TRIP TO REMOVE CONDITIONS

Citizenship

April 29, 2013 - NOA1 for petition received

September 10, 2013 Interview - decision could not be made.

April 15, 2014 APPROVED. Wait for oath ceremony

Waited...

September 29, 2015 - sent letter to senator.

October 16, 2015 - US Citizen

Posted

Just a few reasons why to go with the CR-1. If you are eligible for a IR-1 then you would be nuts going with a K3!

The K3 has to adjust status which cost $1010 + $131 visas application fee.

Have to go thru the cost and hassles of getting a I-693 also.

K3 normally has to do biometrics and have a AOS interview. Time off from work cost the petitioner. PLUS the hassles of submitting the paperwork and going for the interview. Tain’t fun.. Especially if denied or questioned. Ever done a Stokes interview?

That’s the second interview if they are in doubt of your relationship.

Also a possibility of being deported. Yeah doesn’t happen much but it happens.

K3 has to wait about 90 days after they file to get EAD or GC so they can get SSN.

Can’t do a LOT of things without SSN. Like work or get a drivers license in some states.

Some K visas don’t get GC for a LONG time.

If petitioner goes belly up before you get GC you stand a chance of being deported.

If the petitioner loses his/her job after the interview you don’t have to worry about getting a co sponsor to adjust status!

CR-1 cost about $470

Get their GC and SS card in the mail within 6 weeks of arrival.

No biometrics , dealing with civil surgeons, AOS interviews, going to SSA for SS card.

I’m sure I’ve missed a few things.

Bottomline is anyone that goes with the K3 the way things are now are masochist!

Yeah I did but at that time K3s were a LOT faster. That’s not the case anymore.

K1 denied, K3/K4, CR-1/CR-2, AOS, ROC, Adoption, US citizenship and dual citizenship

!! ALL PAU!

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...