Regional Forums Moderator: Charles!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

How many examples are needed before it becomes clear that its a consistent pattern of behaviour?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

They're all targeted at the same person.

I see it as a problem between the two of them.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

They're all targeted at the same person.

I see it as a problem between the two of them.

Your devil's advocate has a short memory, AJ

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

They're all targeted at the same person.

I see it as a problem between the two of them.

Your devil's advocate has a short memory, AJ

I was in the search engine. Plenty of devilette history there. Lots of panty wadding

[*julez* 124]

Which is further evidence that he has a long history of inappropriate interactions with members and is therefore unqualified to be an impartial moderator.

[Ban Hammer 14,707]

That's not what I had in mind. I am suspending the experiment.

Charles, really, do you and those other twerps really have to bring Eric into every thread? I don't respond to anything he says on 'the other board' and I really don't want to see references to his idiocy here, if at all possible.

if you have a real problem with it, take it up with the mods. otherwise, take your whiney too tight panties problem down the hall to someone who cares.

A very recent example of Charles's maturity level and illustrates why he is such a poor choice for the moderation team.

ah yes, let's ignore the insult of "...you and those other twerps..." contained within while you're at it.

perhaps one of the mods could make visible your last personal attack on me and which resulted in your suspension, all to further put your opinion into perspective?

Sounds like he's being jokey.

Unless you guys object to the kind of jokes he cracks, I don't see the point.

If it's his sense of humor y'all have a problem with, say so. And tell us why.

It doesn't come across as humour.

If you go out of your way to make sexually derogatory comments to another poster that you have a disagreement with, humour it ain't.

so we should stick to making observations about someone's (marc) alleged drinking instead?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

This is the worst I could find.. and it's from 2006.

The reason the illegals have chosen May 1 is because it is Mexico's "Dia de Trabajador" or Labor Day. If they were in Mexico they would have the day off. That's why they picked that day.

followed quickly by the anniversary of the news arriving about the titanic sinking, with the 15,000 jars of mayo that was to be delivered to mexico. hence the celebration of sinko de mayo

I'm not sure if that was supposed to be funny in that infantile style of humor or what your intentions were with that post, but I am definitely not amused by jokes about other countries' holidays.

apparently humor is wasted on you

I guess so...as much as I tried I didn't "get" it. Do you have any better jokes??

try taking 2 midol and call me in the morning

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

so we should stick to making observations about someone's (marc) alleged drinking instead?

Precisely why I'd expect never to be put within 5 miles of site management.

What's your point?

[Chica Yeyé 41]

omg this ####### still going on????

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

omg this ####### still going on????

People are speaking their minds. It's ok.

I am sure Charles will be going out of his way to prove everyone wrong.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

For me, this is a prime reason why Charles shouldn't be put in any position of authority on this site.

[cdneh 3,118]

omg this ####### still going on????

Nothing on tv tonight?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

omg this ####### still going on????

Nothing on tv tonight?

What are you watching?

[Ban Hammer 14,707]

ah yes, let's ignore the insult of "...you and those other twerps..." contained within while you're at it.

Which is *exactly* my point. Someone who knows how to diffuse a situation instead of fuel it wouldn't have said something like that. And the misogynistic reply was hardly in line with being called a "twerp."

noted

perhaps one of the mods could make visible your last personal attack on me and which resulted in your suspension, all to further put your opinion into perspective?

Julez isn't being made a mod.

i didn't say that she was. i merely remarked that her invisible remarks could put her remarks in this thread into perspective.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Well first I'll say congrats to Charles.

And then to Ewok: I actually think this is very cool that your giving someone who may not be the model person here on VJ a chance to prove himself and help out. Its good to know people get second chances.

To Gene: Yeah he said some rotten things but this also means if you wanted to help out on VJ Ewok would probably let you help at some point too.

To everyone else: Lets give Charles a chance to show his merit. The past is the past and the future is the future. As long as all that vulgarity is now in the past and not in the future and he shows he can be a good mod I'll support him.

(sorry i'm sure this comes off as terribly naive but its what I think)

Edited October 21, 2009 by Sousuke