Is It Really Necessary????

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Maybe I'm mellowing, but can't all sides of the political fence discuss something, even disagree, without muddying the waters with labels and stupid name calling?

It really diverts the issue.

I mean really.

Ah, Lisa. I tried posting something similar a few months ago and I think people told me to stop being a whiny socialist

tree hugger is more like it

[_Simpson_ 250]

I have seen some topics here that you would think any reasonable minded person would come to the same conclusion but theres always a few people that disagree or focus on a small and insignificant part of the issue so as they can go against the grain.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

I have seen some topics here that you would think any reasonable minded person would come to the same conclusion but theres always a few people that disagree or focus on a small and insignificant part of the issue so as they can go against the grain.

Speak for yourself.

[pedroh 21]

reputhuglican terrorists should all be sent to gitmo and be waterboarded

There's another word for your list, Pedroh. Time to stop reading.

no.. because only idiots use those osama,barrack et al those stupid names.. so they are rethuglicans.. not republicans..

[Fandango 1,440]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

[chri'stina 190]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

hmph!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

Yep. This isn't a mob.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

hmph!

stfu bible thumper

[one...two...tree 2,762]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

conceptually challenged would be the pc term.

This thread needs kittens...

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

conceptually challenged would be the pc term.

i dont do nuance, hippie

[one...two...tree 2,762]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

conceptually challenged would be the pc term.

i dont do nuance, hippie

that's because you are abstractly challenged.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

they should lock you hippies up on an island somewhere, with all the rethugs.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

But mostly they don't. They just keep blabbering on about obvious nonsense for which they have no back-up whatsoever. Nor do they offer any no matter how often one asks for it. Not their fault, you say, because evidence of their frivolous claims simply doesn't exist? Great, then it would be time to concede that one was wrong.

[pedroh 21]

just make an island.. with a pawn shop-gun store next to a trader joes. and there u get all the rethugs and dem hippies..