i 129f domestic violence waiver?

[mari joe 1]

first thanks to all who respond im usc appling for k1 visa i fall under the catagory of domestic violence 13 years ago

both my exwife and i were charged and plead guilty to assalt on each other it is a misdemeaner and i will submit all court papers. i was acting in self defence and it indicates that in my statement in the police report My question: Do i need a waiver when filing I-129f if i check the box i was acting in self defence?

[payxibka 10,048]

first thanks to all who respond im usc appling for k1 visa i fall under the catagory of domestic violence 13 years ago

both my exwife and i were charged and plead guilty to assalt on each other it is a misdemeaner and i will submit all court papers. i was acting in self defence and it indicates that in my statement in the police report My question: Do i need a waiver when filing I-129f if i check the box i was acting in self defence?

i do not think self defense is the issue but the guilty plea

[nowhereman 1]

first thanks to all who respond im usc appling for k1 visa i fall under the catagory of domestic violence 13 years ago

both my exwife and i were charged and plead guilty to assalt on each other it is a misdemeaner and i will submit all court papers. i was acting in self defence and it indicates that in my statement in the police report My question: Do i need a waiver when filing I-129f if i check the box i was acting in self defence?

i do not think self defense is the issue but the guilty plea

He's right... if you plead guilty your claim that it was in self defense is null & void. Although domestic violence can be a misdemeanor it is considered more serious than most other misdemeanors (much like driving under the influence). You may need a lawyer's advice on this one.

[mari joe 1]

first thanks to all who respond im usc appling for k1 visa i fall under the catagory of domestic violence 13 years ago

both my exwife and i were charged and plead guilty to assalt on each other it is a misdemeaner and i will submit all court papers. i was acting in self defence and it indicates that in my statement in the police report My question: Do i need a waiver when filing I-129f if i check the box i was acting in self defence?

i do not think self defense is the issue but the guilty plea

He's right... if you plead guilty your claim that it was in self defense is null & void. Although domestic violence can be a misdemeanor it is considered more serious than most other misdemeanors (much like driving under the influence). You may need a lawyer's advice on this one.

My question is do i need a waiver? Does anyone have some insite on that pls?

[Old Dominion 26]

Unless a good lawyer can come up with a technicality, your guilty plea and subsequent conviction will be a factor in USCIS' review of your case. Statements given to police have no weight, under the circumstances.

[nowhereman 1]

first thanks to all who respond im usc appling for k1 visa i fall under the catagory of domestic violence 13 years ago

both my exwife and i were charged and plead guilty to assalt on each other it is a misdemeaner and i will submit all court papers. i was acting in self defence and it indicates that in my statement in the police report My question: Do i need a waiver when filing I-129f if i check the box i was acting in self defence?

i do not think self defense is the issue but the guilty plea

He's right... if you plead guilty your claim that it was in self defense is null & void. Although domestic violence can be a misdemeanor it is considered more serious than most other misdemeanors (much like driving under the influence). You may need a lawyer's advice on this one.

My question is do i need a waiver? Does anyone have some insite on that pls?

It more than likely comes under the umbrella of "moral turpitude", which would require a waiver. http://definitions.uslegal.com/m/moral-turpitude. Again you really need to get the advice of an attorney on this one.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

[pushbrk 13,610]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

[mari joe 1]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

thanks for all your responses so far and i will tell her about it. The actual charges we plead nolo to were called (affray) a lesser misdeminor charge defined as "a scuffle" but still falls under domestic violence.

[nowhereman 1]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

thanks for all your responses so far and i will tell her about it. The actual charges we plead nolo to were called (affray) a lesser misdeminor charge defined as "a scuffle" but still falls under domestic violence.

Yea it was probably called "Simple Battery" or perhaps Assault in the 3rd Degree. Nolo is considered a conviction but it's not an admission of guilt & it usually protects someone from a civil suit on the same charge.

[Jasman0717 9]

first thanks to all who respond im usc appling for k1 visa i fall under the catagory of domestic violence 13 years ago

both my exwife and i were charged and plead guilty to assalt on each other it is a misdemeaner and i will submit all court papers. i was acting in self defence and it indicates that in my statement in the police report My question: Do i need a waiver when filing I-129f if i check the box i was acting in self defence?

i do not think self defense is the issue but the guilty plea

[mari joe 1]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

thanks for all your responses so far and i will tell her about it. The actual charges we plead nolo to were called (affray) a lesser misdeminor charge defined as "a scuffle" but still falls under domestic violence.

Yea it was probably called "Simple Battery" or perhaps Assault in the 3rd Degree. Nolo is considered a conviction but it's not an admission of guilt & it usually protects someone from a civil suit on the same charge.

this is the link http://www.fianceevisaservices.com/howtofillini129f.html to one website that says if you tick yes to part c question 3 without extenuating cercumstances IE: self defense, then your application will most likely be denied. now im confused again

[pushbrk 13,610]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

thanks for all your responses so far and i will tell her about it. The actual charges we plead nolo to were called (affray) a lesser misdeminor charge defined as "a scuffle" but still falls under domestic violence.

Yea it was probably called "Simple Battery" or perhaps Assault in the 3rd Degree. Nolo is considered a conviction but it's not an admission of guilt & it usually protects someone from a civil suit on the same charge.

this is the link http://www.fianceevisaservices.com/howtofillini129f.html to one website that says if you tick yes to part c question 3 without extenuating cercumstances IE: self defense, then your application will most likely be denied. now im confused again

I guess you'll just have to use your best judgment as to who knows their stuff. Why not simply read the IMBRA law itself, then use your own "stuff"?

[mari joe 1]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

thanks for all your responses so far and i will tell her about it. The actual charges we plead nolo to were called (affray) a lesser misdeminor charge defined as "a scuffle" but still falls under domestic violence.

Yea it was probably called "Simple Battery" or perhaps Assault in the 3rd Degree. Nolo is considered a conviction but it's not an admission of guilt & it usually protects someone from a civil suit on the same charge.

this is the link http://www.fianceevisaservices.com/howtofillini129f.html to one website that says if you tick yes to part c question 3 without extenuating cercumstances IE: self defense, then your application will most likely be denied. now im confused again

I guess you'll just have to use your best judgment as to who knows their stuff. Why not simply read the IMBRA law itself, then use your own "stuff"?

ive read hundreds of comments here and everything i can find on the subject including the Imbra law

out of all the comments and opinions ive read i trust your opinion the most even above my own

becouse i am emotionally involved so it makes it confusing, im trying to do my best at this

[john & jean 37]

Indeed, it is a crime of moral turpitude. I also wonder if this falls under the jurisdiction of the Adam Walsh Act.

This discussion is going all over the place. IMBRA is about informing the immigrating K visa applicant about certain US citizen criminal records. Petitions are not denied based on IMBRA. Crimes of moral turpitude are an issue for immigrants, not US citizens. A convicted murderer on parole can get a petition approved as long as the crime didn't fall under the Adam Walsh act.

There are two kinds of IMBRA waivers.

1. Waiver of the filing limitations for multiple beneficiaries. (not applicable here)

2. Waiver of reporting the crime to the intending immigrant. (that's the applicable one here)

Unless the petitioner wants to conceal the record from the fiance(e) or spouse, the second waiver category isn't needed.

thanks for all your responses so far and i will tell her about it. The actual charges we plead nolo to were called (affray) a lesser misdeminor charge defined as "a scuffle" but still falls under domestic violence.

Yea it was probably called "Simple Battery" or perhaps Assault in the 3rd Degree. Nolo is considered a conviction but it's not an admission of guilt & it usually protects someone from a civil suit on the same charge.

this is the link http://www.fianceevisaservices.com/howtofillini129f.html to one website that says if you tick yes to part c question 3 without extenuating cercumstances IE: self defense, then your application will most likely be denied. now im confused again

I guess you'll just have to use your best judgment as to who knows their stuff. Why not simply read the IMBRA law itself, then use your own "stuff"?

ive read hundreds of comments here and everything i can find on the subject including the Imbra law

out of all the comments and opinions ive read i trust your opinion the most even above my own

becouse i am emotionally involved so it makes it confusing, im trying to do my best at this