Obama 2012

you too eh? - Krikit has an inherent bias on these forums and is out to get certain people. Including randomly suspending people for posts that other mods have deemed as 'acceptable' because they do not agree with them personally. Completely defeating the purpose of trying to be an unbiased moderator.

you too eh? - Krikit has an inherent bias on these forums and is out to get certain people. Including randomly suspending people for posts that other mods have deemed as 'acceptable' because they do not agree with them personally. Completely defeating the purpose of trying to be an unbiased moderator.

you too eh? - Krikit has an inherent bias on these forums and is out to get certain people. Including randomly suspending people for posts that other mods have deemed as 'acceptable' because they do not agree with them personally. Completely defeating the purpose of trying to be an unbiased moderator.

you too eh? - Krikit has an inherent bias on these forums and is out to get certain people. Including randomly suspending people for posts that other mods have deemed as 'acceptable' because they do not agree with them personally. Completely defeating the purpose of trying to be an unbiased moderator.

Liberals Indoctrinate Children to Control Society. This is what the Steve is upset with. The children are missing out on this.They will not grow up to be good kenyan supporters.

Apparently I missed the part where the story says that people should live the way the books say life was? All I saw was that people should read the books for a perspective on the times... Nothing about how things should be today in the way we live our lives...

I'm trying figure out why Steven has a problem with historical works?

Oh I read it, I just interpreted a bit differently.
Training in the highest apsects of human character is very true when you really think about it. I think you're over-analyzing what he said here. He's simply saying that it's great training to know/understand the different aspects of human characteristics. I can easily say to know everything about Hitler to understand the highest characteristics of human nature. If you understand anything about human nature, then you'd interpret that to mean to know how Hitler would think, to put yourself in those shoes and to understand. However if you read it for face value you, you might think I was trying to tell people to idolize and be like Hitler.
I think the author of the article is trying to bastardize the intent for political gain (as alternet likes to do). Nothing more, nothing less.

I'm trying figure out why Steven has a problem with historical works?

Thank Goodness the Republicans were able to get the civil rights bill passed despite strong opposition from the dems. Over 80% support in the Senate by Repubs.. Only 67% of Dems supported. Over 80% support by Repubs in the house only 61% support by dems in the House.
Thank God that Republicans have always lead the way on true Freedom.

AND on another day in history
Republicans in West Virginia discovered a letter Sen. Byrd had written to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK three years after he says he abandoned the group. He wrote: “The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia” and “in every state in the Union.”

He worked on big movies ....He made big $$$$$$ Typical lib. more like he blew all his money on the good life and crack and never saved a dime. Now when the good days end he does not have a pot too piss in and wants everyone to support him.

Wait. I thought Apple was a non profit religious organization?

Israel/Palestine.... We should leave them both alone and let them destroy each other.

Nail on head.
----------
http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell082112.php3
There are some very serious issues at stake in this year's election — so many that some people may not be able to see the forest for the trees. Individual issues are the trees, but the forest is the future of America as we have known it.
The America that has flourished for more than two centuries is being quietly but steadily dismantled by the Obama administration, during the process of dealing with particular issues.
For example, the merits or demerits of President Obama's recent executive order, suspending legal liability for young people who are here illegally, presumably as a result of being brought here as children by their parents, can be debated pro and con. But such a debate overlooks the much more fundamental undermining of the whole American system of Constitutional government.
The separation of powers into legislative, executive and judicial branches of government is at the heart of the Constitution of the United States — and the Constitution is at the heart of freedom for Americans.
No President of the United States is authorized to repeal parts of legislation passed by Congress. He may veto the whole legislation, but then Congress can override his veto if they have enough votes. Nevertheless, every President takes an oath to faithfully execute the laws that have been passed and sustained — not just the ones he happens to agree with.
If laws passed by the elected representatives of the people can be simply over-ruled unilaterally by whoever is in the White House, then we are no longer a free people, choosing what laws we want to live under.
When a President can ignore the plain language of duly passed laws, and substitute his own executive orders, then we no longer have "a government of laws, and not of men" but a President ruling by decree, like the dictator in some banana republic.
When we confine our debates to the merits or demerits of particular executive orders, we are tacitly accepting arbitrary rule. The Constitution of the United States cannot protect us unless we protect the Constitution. But, if we allow ourselves to get bogged down in the details of particular policies imposed by executive orders, and vote solely on that basis, then we have failed to protect the Constitution — and ourselves.
Whatever the merits or demerits of the No Child Left Behind Act, it is the law until Congress either repeals it or amends it. But for Barack Obama to unilaterally waive whatever provisions he doesn't like in that law undermines the fundamental nature of American government.
President Obama has likewise unilaterally repealed the legal requirement that welfare recipients must work, by simply redefining "work" to include other things like going to classes on weight control. If we think the bipartisan welfare reform legislation from the Clinton administration should be repealed or amended, that is something for the legislative branch of government to consider.
There have been many wise warnings that freedom is seldom lost all at once. It is usually eroded away, bit by bit, until it is all gone. You may not notice a gradual erosion while it is going on, but you may eventually be shocked to discover one day that it is all gone, that we have been reduced from citizens to subjects, and the Constitution has become just a meaningless bunch of paper.
ObamaCare imposes huge costs on some institutions, while the President's arbitrary waivers exempt other institutions from having to pay those same costs. That is hardly the "equal protection of the laws," promised by the 14th Amendment.
John Stuart Mill explained the dangers in that kind of government long ago: "A government with all this mass of favours to give or to withhold, however free in name, wields a power of bribery scarcely surpassed by an avowed autocracy, rendering it master of the elections in almost any circumstances but those of rare and extraordinary public excitement."
If Obama gets reelected, he knows that he need no longer worry about what the voters think about anything he does. Never having to face them again, he can take his arbitrary rule by decree as far as he wants. He may be challenged in the courts but, if he gets just one more Supreme Court appointment, he can pick someone who will rubber stamp anything he does and give him a 5 to 4 majority.

Israel/Palestine.... We should leave them both alone and let them destroy each other.

Israel/Palestine.... We should leave them both alone and let them destroy each other.

Israel/Palestine.... We should leave them both alone and let them destroy each other.

Israel/Palestine.... We should leave them both alone and let them destroy each other.

See, I have no problem with abortions myself. Actually more women should have them (or just not get pregnant period). I'm pro population control.
My problem comes in though, when it comes to a father of a child. If a father doesn't want a child, he's still responsible for it by law. If he wants the child and the mother doesn't, she can abort the child and there's nothing he can do about it.

See, I have no problem with abortions myself. Actually more women should have them (or just not get pregnant period). I'm pro population control.
My problem comes in though, when it comes to a father of a child. If a father doesn't want a child, he's still responsible for it by law. If he wants the child and the mother doesn't, she can abort the child and there's nothing he can do about it.

People shouldn't have kids if they cannot afford to take care of them.
Everyone else shouldn't have to pay for their brat's meals.
Of course you feel that these kids should be taken care of, there are plenty of charities that you can donate to that don't require government intervention.

I wonder what the father to be had to say.

Affirmative Action = You're less talented, but because you aren't white you get to do something and we're going to stop the white guy from doing it.

Somehow I knew Evylin read garbage like addictinginfo and worshiped their articles....
Gotta love how they try to spin this to try and be an American story even though it's not. Typical FAR-left wing whacko bullshit.