joaovily

I wonder what is the worst case scenario with how long they might take to approve EAD. Had my bio appt feb 5 and so far nothing, My mom had her appt in jan 5 and also nothing. I don't have a lot of experience with immigration, so i have no idea how long it can take, some people got it the next day while others wait 3 6 8 months or longer. How long do you guys think we will have to wait for that sweet work permit?

i meant to say after one day of my package arriving in their office, they sent a text message saying they received it

Update: After receiving my rejection notice, I quickly re downloaded the form i-485 completed it and signed it, sent next day air, it got in Chicago after 16 hours and they approved it after one day.

The form was brand new, but I signed it two days before that edition was released. I was using a preview version. They claimed it was outdated but I think this was due to the signature being before the official release.

Just got my application back in the mail today. They claim I filed on a outdated version of the form, which is not true since I used the 12/23/2022 edition. I called customer support and they said it could be because my signature was dated on 12/21, 2 days before the edition date. Has anybody here signed before the edition date and got approved? Do you guys think they were being unreasonable on denying me?

I assume no. I am refiling my package, they were still fast back in dec 15, the turnaround was like 3 days. I sent my moms package and they received on the 8th and got a text on the 13th

Just an update, have not received any text messages and my check is still not cashed They received my package on the 27th. Has anyone here that filed after Christmas received their NOA text or got they checks cashed? USCIS tweeted this on Dec 30th but I don't know if they are referring to text notifications or mailing out the NOA "Receipt notifications for all properly filed petitions are currently in the process of being mailed out. The intake of the supplemental petitions, along with the issuance of receipt notices, was delayed 5 business days from the date of the first proper filings."

Sent my AOS package on December 20 Delivered on December 27 Waiting for texts messages. Had to refile it after getting rejection notice because of outdated forms Called USCIS today to see if they had any information linked to the receipt notice included in the rejection letter but no luck Money order hasn't been cashed yet I'm hoping that by next week they will have at least cashed the check, don't want to go through refiling it again, the whole process takes 2 weeks or more.

I don’t blame you, wording is very confusing, specially with the weird name this Public charge thing has, the “inadmissability” part makes you think you would only answer yes if you were inadmissable by using benefits. This had me running back to UPS to ask them if i could open the package and exchange the pages with new ones.

Yes, if i remember correctly on this question it tells you to read about the public charge Heres a Q&A from the USCIS page about Public charge ground of inadmissibility Q: Who is exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility? A: The following noncitizens are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility when applying for visas, admission, or adjustment of status: Asylees and refugees; Amerasian immigrants at admission; Afghan and Iraqi interpreters or Afghan or Iraqi nationals employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government; Cuban and Haitian entrants at adjustment of status; Applicants seeking adjustment under the Cuban Adjustment Act; Nicaraguans and other Central Americans who are adjusting status to LPR; Haitians who are adjusting status to LPR; Lautenberg parolees; Special immigrant juveniles; Applicants for registry; Applicants seeking Temporary Protected Status (TPS); Certain nonimmigrant ambassadors, ministers, diplomats, and other foreign government officials, and their families; Human trafficking victims (T nonimmigrants); Victims of qualifying criminal activity (U nonimmigrants); Self-petitioners under the Violence against Women Act (VAWA); Certain battered noncitizens who are “qualified aliens” under PRWORA; Applicants adjusting status who qualify for a benefit as surviving spouses, children, or parents of military members; Noncitizen American Indians born in Canada; Noncitizen members of the Texas Band of Kickapoo Indians of the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma; Nationals of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos applying under the Indochinese Act; Polish and Hungarian Parolees; Certain Syrian nationals; Applicants adjusting under the Liberian Refugee Immigration Fairness (LRIF) law; and Any other categories of noncitizens exempt under any other law from the public charge ground of inadmissibility provisions under INA 212(a)(4). If you do not fall into one of the categories in the list, my personal opinion is that you should answer YES and describe your education level, income etc.

I’ve read a official statement linked in the USCIS page. It says that any non-citizen is subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility, unless they have some exempt status or have been exempted by the Congress. I think that what people on this topic have got confused is that being subject to this public charge act does not come from using benefits, but in reality that wording only means DHS reserves the right to determine if you are a Public charge or not. That would be based on your education level, age, health, if you used benefits etc.. Answering yes just demonstrates that you fall into one of the categories of people who USCIS are not exempting from the Public charge act. This is also validated by the fact that theres a question asking if you have used benefits inside that part of the form, so saying yes or no to the question in the pic doesnt mean you are answering that you never used benefits. Again i’m not trying to butt heads with anyone, since i made my decision on what to say on mine way before posting here. Quote from the federalregister.gov link: ”Noncitizens who are applicants for visas, admission, and adjustment of status must establish that they are not likely at any time to become a public charge unless Congress has expressly exempted them from this ground of inadmissibility or has otherwise permitted them to seek a waiver of inadmissibility.”

Should be fine unless the person has actually used benefits, and doesnt have a sponsor. Only people i have seen having problems with this in the past is the ones applying for K1 visas in embassys outside the USA. They are a lot more careful about who to let into to the United States.

I guess what matters at the end is if you have used any benefits, thanks for the tip though. To be honest i think this question is ridiculuos taking into consideration most people cant even use benefits.

I appreciate all the attention, i made this post after i had already put the package in the mail, so i cant go back and redo my answers.

Anyways, i am not too focused if the answer is yes or no, since i already said yes, it is what it is.But my question is how is this impacting people at the time of interview, does anybody know about that?