Babu Frik

Did you read the invite? it specifically addresses this

So they said that while the officer was looking through their transcripts, they saw that they owed taxes, and I guess they didn't have good enough proof about them being paid. That's the reason I included the account transcript with mine, because it would show a 0 balance.

You need to request it, could be bad news if you don't provide 5 years,

I had to contact my bank to get older statements and they were able to retrieve them for me Me as well, but this person was asked for them at the interview. I'll see if they post anymore info.

I only added the account transcript to show i paid off owed taxes. Hoping they don't ask for actual returns, my assumption is that this person has a special case. This is the answer 🥇

I saw this post on FB for someone who had an interview yesterday which has made me nervous. I had submitted transcripts and account transcript "Federal Plaza NYC office: Hi everyone! The officer said I need to attach my tax return for the last 5 years to my USCIS account (not a transcript! I had that at the interview), and proof of tax payments"

I think you're in the wrong thread

It won't affect June filers

There's no specific timeline, everyones case is unique which can lead to shorter or longer wait times, accompanied by their specific field office. Can you fill out your timeline so we can see your details?

Derp, sorry, I totally missed that. Good luck!

were you also living in marital union for 3 years prior to the 90 days?

well having someone else write your essay won't qualify for being a "good citizen"

Whoops autocomplete typo, *depends

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/04/trump-administration-citizenship-test-00544390 The Trump administration, in its second term, plans to make the U.S. citizenship test more difficult. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director, Joseph Edlow, stated that the current test is "just too easy" and that applicants can be "coached" on how to pass. The proposed changes include making the test more "thought-provoking" and potentially requiring applicants to write an essay about what becoming an American means to them. The current test requires applicants to correctly answer 6 out of 10 questions from a list of 100, and also to have basic English skills. The new test would be expanded to 20 questions, with applicants needing to answer 12 correctly. These changes are part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to tighten the U.S. immigration system, which also includes expanding USCIS's law enforcement capabilities to combat fraud and resuming practices like interviewing immigration applicants' coworkers and neighbors.

Yes you can, whether it's an issue for marital union or not really friends on the officer

yeah I saw people saying they're waiting up to 7 months for oath ceremony we might get a denial for applying too early, but at least it puts us closer to reapplying.

Interview scheduled for October 15th

That's not proof, someone who purposely did it could also make the same argument.

I've seen posts where the DMV have signed people up for voting automatically when they didn't request it.

They tried to allow non citizens to vote in NYC 🤦‍♂️ Not sure if that would've applied here though or just federal. New York City Can’t Allow Noncitizens to Vote, Top State Court Rules - The New York Times https://share.google/wmfUxEpa7CipjKSNc

Forgot to mention, this was just updated yesterday.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/policy-manual-updates/20250829-VoterRegistrationGMC.pdf Some key points - green card holders who voted or attempted to vote at blocked from citizenship - deportation can be initiated for any green card holder who committed voter fraud or claimed us citizenship to receive a benefit. I imagine people who got accidentally registered will be freaking out.

If you don't even have an interview date yet, this sounds like it's still months till you're a citizen, unless you're working remotely, this could be a problem.

you can also upload unsolicited evidence