given the context of the discussion at the time and the judgements being passed by you on others ... sarcastic questions were asked.
guess the questions hit a little too close ...
think it's best you leave it alone.
husband comment .... is he the only one?
daughter comment ... is she the only one who has ever done this? ... why not bash all teens in this situation?
selectively judgmental?
aka: backdoor registration.
the gov't would have the firearm "class" based on ammo type and who may own the firearm. the data may not be 100% accurate though it would be close
and i'm sure the gov't would keep that information safe and secure so joe citizen or any other entity doesn't have access to who may own what type of firearm
heck ...even the non savory types wouldn't want access to all that boring data ... it would be too much of a bother knowing which homes have guns ...
i can also envision a run on wheel weights in parking lots and depletion of fishing weights, solder, and other sources of casting materials.
You will never convince people of this when new regulations are created. I think most US gun owners are aware of the process the UK used to slowly kill gun ownership.
July 17, 2012
Why Obama's College Records Matter
By Monte Kuligowski
In context of the "mounting pressure" for Mitt Romney to provide more tax and employment records, a reporter recently asked White House Press Secretary Jay Carney whether President Obama would set an example in transparency and release some of his records that critics have asked for.
That question was fingernails on the chalkboard to Carney. "Is that from Donald Trump?" Carey sneered, and laughed -- this time conspicuously alone.
This time it was Carney's own boss who had recently opened the door by demanding that Romney be an "open book" on personal finances.
Carney responded with the audacious claim that Obama is an "open book" and has a record of "unprecedented transparency." And the sky is green, and the grass is blue. Carney also suggested that the question wasn't specific.
When the reporter got specific and asked if Obama would release his college records, Carney replied: "Right, this is the Donald Trump question. It is preposterous. This is from the guy who insisted he didn't believe the president was born in the United States."
Asking for college records is preposterous?
Writing for the TheBlaze.com, Jason Howerton suggests:
Carney was obviously trying to lump those who are interested to see what types of college courses Obama took in college into the same category as 'birthers.' However, many who want to see the president's college transcripts say wanting to see the president's transcripts has nothing to do with his citizenship. Rather they argue it could help provide insight into the types of courses Obama sought out while in college, which some believe promoted radical ideologies.
Yes, many want to see Obama's college records for grades and courses (as with G.W. Bush and others). But in Obama's case, the primary reason to see his college applications is to learn whether the president applied for college in the U.S. as a foreign student.
Why should the public want to confirm that Obama did not register as a foreigner while not having the same concern for other candidates? Read on.
Most of the basic records of Barack Obama's past -- vital, hospital, medical, education, passport, draft registration, et al. -- are guarded as securely as the gold at Fort Knox. Notably, two documents -- elementary school and Selective Service registrations -- were obtained by independent citizens. And Breitbart.com independently obtained an interesting biographical brochure produced in 1991 by Obama's literary publicist.
The Associated Press (AP) was able to obtain a copy of Obama's elementary school registration from the Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia in 2007.
And Stephen Coffman, a retired Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, obtained a copy of Obama's Selective Service registration form via a FOIA request just days prior to the 2008 election.
From the 2012 Breitbart discovery we learned that Mr. Obama presented himself in 1991 as "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii." From the AP discovery we learned that Barack Obama was registered for school in Jakarta as a citizen of Indonesia named Barry Soetoro. And from the Selective Service registration form we learned that the same form had been forged.
Barack Obama lived in Islamic Indonesia as Barry Soetoro with his mother and stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, and attended school in Jakarta from ages 6 to 10. It's beyond amazing that the general public is not aware of that fact. Last Thanksgiving I was with my in-laws and was surprised to learn that they had never heard that Obama lived in Indonesia as Barry Soetoro. And they are not uneducated people.
The "mainstream" media do not want to touch those facts.
The big question is whether little Barry was adopted by his stepfather, who was a citizen of Indonesia. There is reason to believe that he was and that in order to have been enrolled in public school in Indonesia, Barry had to be a citizen. Aaron Klein of WND.com notes that "[a]fter attending the Assisi Primary School, Obama later was enrolled at SDN Menteng 1, an Indonesian public school."
That Obama might have been a citizen of Indonesia and later presented himself as a foreign student in the U.S. is no "birther" conspiracy theory. It's the gravamen of the college records question.
Let's stop right here and stipulate for the sake of argument that Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.
But even with the stipulation, we nevertheless have a major problem with Obama's records and staunch secrecy.
Of the few records that we have seen relating to Obama's past all are problematic and they point to a potential citizenship problem for Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro.
Mr. Obama's Arizona nemesis, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, is readily dismissed by the establishment press as a man with an ax to grind -- but his control-test findings have not been disproven.
Once again, the general public remains in the dark because the national one-voice media will not touch the story.
Sherriff Joe's law enforcement "posse" confirmed what a multitude of nonpartisan computer graphic experts have already known. The image Mr. Obama "released" on April 27, 2011 is a computer-generated forgery. Irrespective of Mr. Obama's Hawaii birth, for some reason Obama did not upload a certified copy of his birth certificate to the internet; neither is he allowing Hawaii to send certified paper copies to interested state election officials.
Since Obama was born in Hawaii, the question is: why the forgery? And why the continued secrecy?
Something is not right. I have speculated that Obama's secrecy over the birth certificate may have been a calculated diversion from the important constitutional requirement for presidential candidates to have been born with a natural, sole allegiance to the United States.
That could be partially correct. Additionally, Obama might be hiding an amendment to his birth certificate, reflecting his adoption by Lolo Soetoro.
Others have suggested that the reason for the forgery could be over a petty issue, such as his mother having signed the certificate with her maiden name. In other words, but for the secrecy and forgery, the birth certificate may be completely irrelevant.
Nevertheless, if Obama has a citizenship problem because of Indonesia, the rest of the oddities and secrecies begin to make sense.
Sheriff Joe's team found probable cause to conclude that Obama also forged his Selective Service registration form. The mismatched date stamp "80" instead of "1980" is evidence not only of forgery, but of a crude forgery.
Then there is the question of why is Obama using a Social Security number issued on application from Connecticut, a state in which he never lived.
If that's not a news story, what is? Romney's tax records?
In light of the few biographical documents we have seen so far, coupled with the bizarre secrecy of Obama, it might be a good idea for "pressure to mount" for Obama to produce his college records.
And while we're at it, what passport did Obama use for his college break to Islamic Pakistan in 1981?
Since Obama is an "open book," producing informative records shouldn't be a problem for him.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/why_obamas_college_records_matter.html#ixzz21b8XgYAM
Because I disagree with it. Your statement of how generally available hand guns are is irrelelevant that handguns should be outlawed and you would turn yours in if it was law. Why is the law stopping you from doing what you so strongly believe in? Why not answer my question? Why not show everyone just how serious you are and how much of a model citizen you are and turn in your handguns? One would think that if you really felt as strongly as you say you do, that you would want to be a leader in this crusade to save so many lives. So c'mon, put up!
as a fellow ct yankee .. i'm glad i was taught by people who grew up learning the kings english. it turned out to be rather helpful in understanding friends across the pond.
it was also amusing to watch my uk coworkers gawk at me during a meal ... they were totally befuddled as to how i learned to eat properly ....
natty bumppo got a reaction from I AM NOT THAT GUY in In Obama era, have race relations improved?
natty bumppo got a reaction from Ban Hammer in In Obama era, have race relations improved?
natty bumppo got a reaction from SMOKE in In Obama era, have race relations improved?
natty bumppo got a reaction from TracyTN in Chick-Fil-A takes perception dive with fast food eaters
natty bumppo got a reaction from Penny Lane in Chick-Fil-A takes perception dive with fast food eaters
natty bumppo got a reaction from JohnR! in Chick-Fil-A takes perception dive with fast food eaters
natty bumppo got a reaction from IR5FORMUMSIE in The Off Topic forum is healthy again.
natty bumppo got a reaction from del-2-5-2014 in Romney staffer to press in Poland: KISS MY A$$!
natty bumppo got a reaction from kytwell in Hand Guns
natty bumppo got a reaction from iPhone User in Hand Guns
natty bumppo got a reaction from elmcitymaven in THE MANDATE IS CONSTITUTIONAL