Jump to content

Crazy Cat

Members, Global Mod
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    39,099

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    658

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Crazy Cat

  1. Crazy Cat
    A Joint Sponsor can be any qualified US citizen or Green card holder domiciled in the US.
  2. Crazy Cat
    ***Similar topics merged***
  3. Crazy Cat
    No. The petitioner is ALWAYS the primary sponsor....and must submit an I-864 and supporting documents.
  4. Crazy Cat
    I agree with @Dashinka. Sure they can apply, but the Consulate makes the final decision. Officer could think they are trying to bypass long wait time for IR-5 visas....or Officer could see they are following legal path and approve. You just have to roll the dice. It will have no effect on the IR-5 cases at all.
  5. Crazy Cat
    Online marriages are absolutely worth it for many situations. The consulate in Morocco will absolutely honor a Utah online marriage if the couple meet either during or after the ceremony. Spending quality time together is required for any consulate. I agree that is always more scrutiny in certain countries.
  6. Crazy Cat
    Yep. That is a good question. Like I said, it isn't easy to maintain legal status while awaiting AOS. I guess F1s could.....certainly not K-1s or B2s.
  7. Crazy Cat
    Worst case scenario is that a Consulate Officer would require joint sponsor documentation to be uploaded to CEAC. It would be a short delay, but not a denial, imo.
  8. Crazy Cat
    It is possible as a Consulate Officer must consider the totality of circumstances in every case. However, I think, for most people in the situation you describe, it wouldn't be a problem. I very strongly advise you to avoid the mental gymnastics of the "what if" game. It will drive you crazy.
  9. Crazy Cat
    Yes. Well, a judge cannot make immigration policy....although some rogue judges think otherwise. 😄
  10. Crazy Cat
    Agree. However, I have been thinking about this a lot. "Authorized Stay" is not part of the INA and (as we all know), not a legal status. It is "merely" a policy by the Attorney General and/or head of DHS. A policy can be changed with the stroke of a pen. I would not be surprised to see the policy changed. However, this would cause a massive upheaval in the immigration world as few people can keep legal status while waiting for adjustment of status.
  11. Crazy Cat
    Really? That is a MAJOR game changer.....
  12. Crazy Cat
    It sounded, to me, like a lot of consulate officer discretion.
  13. Crazy Cat
    The huge bonds are guaranteed to bring the "you are excluding the poor" accusations. My rationalization is that only those who can support their visits need apply.
  14. Crazy Cat
    I wonder if any of her critics have a dog.......AH had a dog, too.......... That makes as much sense as these SJWs make in their crazy associations.
  15. Crazy Cat
    This exactly correct, imho. This really needs to be changed.
  16. Crazy Cat
    Do you have your NVC case number?
  17. Crazy Cat
    **I am moving this to the Philippines regional forum for the PI experts to see****
  18. Crazy Cat
    Current annual income is king. Past income tax forms reflect what you reported in the past, not what income you currently earn to support a new immigrant. I hope you include evidence of what you expect to earn over the next 12 months. Good luck.
  19. Crazy Cat
    Nope. If they violate their non-immigrant visas, the US Treasury increases. He wants those tourists who will return home before they overstay.
  20. Crazy Cat
    I don't recall the "Big Beautiful Bill" raising their wages...
  21. Crazy Cat
    ***This old thread is now locked for future comments. Please start any questions as new topics***
  22. Crazy Cat
    Irrelevant.
  23. Crazy Cat
    Agree. ICE could grab OP at any time. and submitting an improper I-485 could put him on their radar.
  24. Crazy Cat
    That could be an issue if he is "stateless".....or is there a work around?
  25. Crazy Cat
    Still separated?
×
×
  • Create New...