-Dalliance-

I don't know why you would come here, make a bunch of assumptions, and then accuse the OP of behaviour you think he showed. How dare you. 
 
Read a little further into the thread, and you'll see that his wife did a complete 180 immediately after marriage. In this forum, we're certainly allowed to read between the lines, but when you suggest things for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, you're not acting in good faith. You think his wife "doesn't feel safe with him"?! Where did you get that impression? Seriously. 
 
You're supposed to assume, when an OP makes statements of fact, that they're actually telling the truth (if there's no solid reason to believe otherwise). Because if you don't do that, then this place would devolve into a toxic and unhelpful forum where people don't take statements at face value and thereby hurt all the OP's who are truly telling the truth.
 
The OP in this case explained that his wife seemed to have been bluffing with her offer to move back to her home country. When he subsequently offered to pay for her ticket home, she refused. Then she moved out without a word. Those aren't the actions of someone who "just wants to go home" and "doesn't intend to cause harm". 
 
And according to you, it's "obvious" that he "didn't even try to talk to her about what bothers her or made her change that way"? What in the world. How could you possibly know that? What if he did bring up his concerns? What if nothing is bothering her, and she simply wanted to commit fraud in order to live in the States? That's a possibility, too, you know. USCIS warns citizen spouses about it all the time. 
 
Also, if a spouse changes that quickly upon marriage, withholds sex from their partner, suddenly doesn't want to change their name, and doesn't want to do any of the things that were previously and mutually planned out, then it's THAT person's responsibility to tell their partner what's going on in their head. Otherwise, what else are you supposed to think except that it was a bait-and-switch, given the context of the case, especially when fraud is rampant? 
 
I can't believe you wrote those things in all seriousness. I'm actually disgusted on the OP's behalf.
 
 
.
 

I don't know why you would come here, make a bunch of assumptions, and then accuse the OP of behaviour you think he showed. How dare you. 
 
Read a little further into the thread, and you'll see that his wife did a complete 180 immediately after marriage. In this forum, we're certainly allowed to read between the lines, but when you suggest things for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, you're not acting in good faith. You think his wife "doesn't feel safe with him"?! Where did you get that impression? Seriously. 
 
You're supposed to assume, when an OP makes statements of fact, that they're actually telling the truth (if there's no solid reason to believe otherwise). Because if you don't do that, then this place would devolve into a toxic and unhelpful forum where people don't take statements at face value and thereby hurt all the OP's who are truly telling the truth.
 
The OP in this case explained that his wife seemed to have been bluffing with her offer to move back to her home country. When he subsequently offered to pay for her ticket home, she refused. Then she moved out without a word. Those aren't the actions of someone who "just wants to go home" and "doesn't intend to cause harm". 
 
And according to you, it's "obvious" that he "didn't even try to talk to her about what bothers her or made her change that way"? What in the world. How could you possibly know that? What if he did bring up his concerns? What if nothing is bothering her, and she simply wanted to commit fraud in order to live in the States? That's a possibility, too, you know. USCIS warns citizen spouses about it all the time. 
 
Also, if a spouse changes that quickly upon marriage, withholds sex from their partner, suddenly doesn't want to change their name, and doesn't want to do any of the things that were previously and mutually planned out, then it's THAT person's responsibility to tell their partner what's going on in their head. Otherwise, what else are you supposed to think except that it was a bait-and-switch, given the context of the case, especially when fraud is rampant? 
 
I can't believe you wrote those things in all seriousness. I'm actually disgusted on the OP's behalf.
 
 
.
 

I don't know why you would come here, make a bunch of assumptions, and then accuse the OP of behaviour you think he showed. How dare you. 
 
Read a little further into the thread, and you'll see that his wife did a complete 180 immediately after marriage. In this forum, we're certainly allowed to read between the lines, but when you suggest things for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, you're not acting in good faith. You think his wife "doesn't feel safe with him"?! Where did you get that impression? Seriously. 
 
You're supposed to assume, when an OP makes statements of fact, that they're actually telling the truth (if there's no solid reason to believe otherwise). Because if you don't do that, then this place would devolve into a toxic and unhelpful forum where people don't take statements at face value and thereby hurt all the OP's who are truly telling the truth.
 
The OP in this case explained that his wife seemed to have been bluffing with her offer to move back to her home country. When he subsequently offered to pay for her ticket home, she refused. Then she moved out without a word. Those aren't the actions of someone who "just wants to go home" and "doesn't intend to cause harm". 
 
And according to you, it's "obvious" that he "didn't even try to talk to her about what bothers her or made her change that way"? What in the world. How could you possibly know that? What if he did bring up his concerns? What if nothing is bothering her, and she simply wanted to commit fraud in order to live in the States? That's a possibility, too, you know. USCIS warns citizen spouses about it all the time. 
 
Also, if a spouse changes that quickly upon marriage, withholds sex from their partner, suddenly doesn't want to change their name, and doesn't want to do any of the things that were previously and mutually planned out, then it's THAT person's responsibility to tell their partner what's going on in their head. Otherwise, what else are you supposed to think except that it was a bait-and-switch, given the context of the case, especially when fraud is rampant? 
 
I can't believe you wrote those things in all seriousness. I'm actually disgusted on the OP's behalf.
 
 
.
 

Just looking for some confirmation that I'm doing the right thing...
 
I received a Request for Initial Evidence (I-485) form after sending in my Adjustment of Status paperwork. The exact wording of the request is as follows:
 
"Submit a copy of the marriage certificate, issued by the appropriate civil authority, between the K-1 applicant and the I-129F petitioner. Any foreign language documents must be accompanied by a complete English translation."
 
The thing is, I did send in a copy of my marriage certificate. After my husband and I got married, we immediately went to the state government vital records office and got three copies of our marriage certificate, and I sent one of those documents in with the AoS paperwork.
 
Does it make a difference that I sent in an actual document instead of a photocopy? Do they ONLY want a photocopy to be submitted? 
 
I've attached a photocopy of the actual document that I sent in. Note that it says "VOID" on the background, which happened automatically with the copier machine. 
 
Is this the right document? Can someone let me know their own experience with sending in a New Hampshire marriage certificate? Thanks!
 
 
 
 
 

I don't know why you would come here, make a bunch of assumptions, and then accuse the OP of behaviour you think he showed. How dare you. 
 
Read a little further into the thread, and you'll see that his wife did a complete 180 immediately after marriage. In this forum, we're certainly allowed to read between the lines, but when you suggest things for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, you're not acting in good faith. You think his wife "doesn't feel safe with him"?! Where did you get that impression? Seriously. 
 
You're supposed to assume, when an OP makes statements of fact, that they're actually telling the truth (if there's no solid reason to believe otherwise). Because if you don't do that, then this place would devolve into a toxic and unhelpful forum where people don't take statements at face value and thereby hurt all the OP's who are truly telling the truth.
 
The OP in this case explained that his wife seemed to have been bluffing with her offer to move back to her home country. When he subsequently offered to pay for her ticket home, she refused. Then she moved out without a word. Those aren't the actions of someone who "just wants to go home" and "doesn't intend to cause harm". 
 
And according to you, it's "obvious" that he "didn't even try to talk to her about what bothers her or made her change that way"? What in the world. How could you possibly know that? What if he did bring up his concerns? What if nothing is bothering her, and she simply wanted to commit fraud in order to live in the States? That's a possibility, too, you know. USCIS warns citizen spouses about it all the time. 
 
Also, if a spouse changes that quickly upon marriage, withholds sex from their partner, suddenly doesn't want to change their name, and doesn't want to do any of the things that were previously and mutually planned out, then it's THAT person's responsibility to tell their partner what's going on in their head. Otherwise, what else are you supposed to think except that it was a bait-and-switch, given the context of the case, especially when fraud is rampant? 
 
I can't believe you wrote those things in all seriousness. I'm actually disgusted on the OP's behalf.
 
 
.
 

I don't know why you would come here, make a bunch of assumptions, and then accuse the OP of behaviour you think he showed. How dare you. 
 
Read a little further into the thread, and you'll see that his wife did a complete 180 immediately after marriage. In this forum, we're certainly allowed to read between the lines, but when you suggest things for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, you're not acting in good faith. You think his wife "doesn't feel safe with him"?! Where did you get that impression? Seriously. 
 
You're supposed to assume, when an OP makes statements of fact, that they're actually telling the truth (if there's no solid reason to believe otherwise). Because if you don't do that, then this place would devolve into a toxic and unhelpful forum where people don't take statements at face value and thereby hurt all the OP's who are truly telling the truth.
 
The OP in this case explained that his wife seemed to have been bluffing with her offer to move back to her home country. When he subsequently offered to pay for her ticket home, she refused. Then she moved out without a word. Those aren't the actions of someone who "just wants to go home" and "doesn't intend to cause harm". 
 
And according to you, it's "obvious" that he "didn't even try to talk to her about what bothers her or made her change that way"? What in the world. How could you possibly know that? What if he did bring up his concerns? What if nothing is bothering her, and she simply wanted to commit fraud in order to live in the States? That's a possibility, too, you know. USCIS warns citizen spouses about it all the time. 
 
Also, if a spouse changes that quickly upon marriage, withholds sex from their partner, suddenly doesn't want to change their name, and doesn't want to do any of the things that were previously and mutually planned out, then it's THAT person's responsibility to tell their partner what's going on in their head. Otherwise, what else are you supposed to think except that it was a bait-and-switch, given the context of the case, especially when fraud is rampant? 
 
I can't believe you wrote those things in all seriousness. I'm actually disgusted on the OP's behalf.
 
 
.
 

I don't know why you would come here, make a bunch of assumptions, and then accuse the OP of behaviour you think he showed. How dare you. 
 
Read a little further into the thread, and you'll see that his wife did a complete 180 immediately after marriage. In this forum, we're certainly allowed to read between the lines, but when you suggest things for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER, you're not acting in good faith. You think his wife "doesn't feel safe with him"?! Where did you get that impression? Seriously. 
 
You're supposed to assume, when an OP makes statements of fact, that they're actually telling the truth (if there's no solid reason to believe otherwise). Because if you don't do that, then this place would devolve into a toxic and unhelpful forum where people don't take statements at face value and thereby hurt all the OP's who are truly telling the truth.
 
The OP in this case explained that his wife seemed to have been bluffing with her offer to move back to her home country. When he subsequently offered to pay for her ticket home, she refused. Then she moved out without a word. Those aren't the actions of someone who "just wants to go home" and "doesn't intend to cause harm". 
 
And according to you, it's "obvious" that he "didn't even try to talk to her about what bothers her or made her change that way"? What in the world. How could you possibly know that? What if he did bring up his concerns? What if nothing is bothering her, and she simply wanted to commit fraud in order to live in the States? That's a possibility, too, you know. USCIS warns citizen spouses about it all the time. 
 
Also, if a spouse changes that quickly upon marriage, withholds sex from their partner, suddenly doesn't want to change their name, and doesn't want to do any of the things that were previously and mutually planned out, then it's THAT person's responsibility to tell their partner what's going on in their head. Otherwise, what else are you supposed to think except that it was a bait-and-switch, given the context of the case, especially when fraud is rampant? 
 
I can't believe you wrote those things in all seriousness. I'm actually disgusted on the OP's behalf.
 
 
.
 

Pinned topic > http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/551080-immunizations-ds-3025-or-i-693/

Sorry not near the form, but I too got one of those fancy sealed envelopes. I still have it and adjusted, without RFE, The form you need is the one that all the "shots" on it and than they need to be checked of appropriately by the physician.
The main thing they are looking for is at the bottom "request for blanket waiver" or similar wording.
If everything went well after your POE, they already have this form (it was included in the brown POE envelope) but apparently they have a habit of getting lost.
Like I said I still have my white envelope (sealed by the dutch doctor). I figure I'll keep it sealed until I get my citizenship. (just for the hell of it).

Since you do not have the DS-3025, I think you should go with the advice of getting the vaccination copy you have transcribed onto an I-693 form by a civil surgeon. I really think that if you send in the copy you have as is, it would cause an RFE because it is neither the DS-3025 or the I-693. However, I also think including the photocopy of your vaccination documentation as evidence, along with the I-693, would be a good idea, because it kind of 'replaces' the DS-3025 that you do not have. You could also include an attachment explaining why you do not have a DS-3025 form for whatever reason, such as you were never given it at the medical abroad, if it will make you feel safer.
I'm not 100% sure about the whole expiration date situation, so take this lightly, but I THINK that as long as the packet is received before the expiration date, any RFE's will not affect date sensitive material. My reasoning is that even if you do not receive any RFE's, it will take many months for the case to be processed by USCIS, so odds are they will process the case far beyond any expiration dates on any of the forms.
All this being said, I also think if you are really worried about date expiration, you could get a new examination done now to submit in AOS. That way you won't have to worry about getting an RFE over the date issue. I hope some of this helps! This is what I would do in your situation based on what you've posted- I'm not here yet so hopefully someone who has been through AOS can offer some more advice. Good luck!