kytwell

Only the blind and arrogant can't see how Israel is half the equation.

Israel has no solution to its predicament, so they have to keep fighting and creating enemies and they also don't care what humanity dies around them. Even their own people say it here.

I know a survivor of the attack. He is one of many that can verify the following report. Neither he, nor any of the other survivors have received any compensation from the Israeli government.
http://ussliberty.org/report/report.htm

Like I said, you are fear-mongering. There is nothing to fear but fear itself.

Fear-mongering

What a pathetic President.

Yes Israel should be held liable to the terrorists they harbor and train.

I think we created some fund for Oklahoma bombing victims and the 9/11 victims's with a fund of some sort. Now we as a country regarding the USS Cole and the Embassy bombings in Africa, I am sure there's insurance policies on those things. ALso, I'm not quite sure which country you suggest we could demand to compensate us for those? As you should know Al Qaeda is not a country. I don't know how we as a country would get reparations from an organization versus the actual individual victims getting compensation from the organization through a lawsuit.
Israel receives lots of money from us, as well as is the only country that receives some special exemption regarding their citizens living in the USA, when buying Israeli bonds they are subject to interest tax but not part of the Deficit Reduction Act. Also all of the private fundraising that goes on under the guise of charity to raise money here to send back to the homeland.
I wish you were able to shield that flag with 1 star blinding you and that religious thing on your sleeve that is weighing you down and take a look at things objectively.

I think we created some fund for Oklahoma bombing victims and the 9/11 victims's with a fund of some sort. Now we as a country regarding the USS Cole and the Embassy bombings in Africa, I am sure there's insurance policies on those things. ALso, I'm not quite sure which country you suggest we could demand to compensate us for those? As you should know Al Qaeda is not a country. I don't know how we as a country would get reparations from an organization versus the actual individual victims getting compensation from the organization through a lawsuit.
Israel receives lots of money from us, as well as is the only country that receives some special exemption regarding their citizens living in the USA, when buying Israeli bonds they are subject to interest tax but not part of the Deficit Reduction Act. Also all of the private fundraising that goes on under the guise of charity to raise money here to send back to the homeland.
I wish you were able to shield that flag with 1 star blinding you and that religious thing on your sleeve that is weighing you down and take a look at things objectively.

I think we created some fund for Oklahoma bombing victims and the 9/11 victims's with a fund of some sort. Now we as a country regarding the USS Cole and the Embassy bombings in Africa, I am sure there's insurance policies on those things. ALso, I'm not quite sure which country you suggest we could demand to compensate us for those? As you should know Al Qaeda is not a country. I don't know how we as a country would get reparations from an organization versus the actual individual victims getting compensation from the organization through a lawsuit.
Israel receives lots of money from us, as well as is the only country that receives some special exemption regarding their citizens living in the USA, when buying Israeli bonds they are subject to interest tax but not part of the Deficit Reduction Act. Also all of the private fundraising that goes on under the guise of charity to raise money here to send back to the homeland.
I wish you were able to shield that flag with 1 star blinding you and that religious thing on your sleeve that is weighing you down and take a look at things objectively.

I think we created some fund for Oklahoma bombing victims and the 9/11 victims's with a fund of some sort. Now we as a country regarding the USS Cole and the Embassy bombings in Africa, I am sure there's insurance policies on those things. ALso, I'm not quite sure which country you suggest we could demand to compensate us for those? As you should know Al Qaeda is not a country. I don't know how we as a country would get reparations from an organization versus the actual individual victims getting compensation from the organization through a lawsuit.
Israel receives lots of money from us, as well as is the only country that receives some special exemption regarding their citizens living in the USA, when buying Israeli bonds they are subject to interest tax but not part of the Deficit Reduction Act. Also all of the private fundraising that goes on under the guise of charity to raise money here to send back to the homeland.
I wish you were able to shield that flag with 1 star blinding you and that religious thing on your sleeve that is weighing you down and take a look at things objectively.

I think we created some fund for Oklahoma bombing victims and the 9/11 victims's with a fund of some sort. Now we as a country regarding the USS Cole and the Embassy bombings in Africa, I am sure there's insurance policies on those things. ALso, I'm not quite sure which country you suggest we could demand to compensate us for those? As you should know Al Qaeda is not a country. I don't know how we as a country would get reparations from an organization versus the actual individual victims getting compensation from the organization through a lawsuit.
Israel receives lots of money from us, as well as is the only country that receives some special exemption regarding their citizens living in the USA, when buying Israeli bonds they are subject to interest tax but not part of the Deficit Reduction Act. Also all of the private fundraising that goes on under the guise of charity to raise money here to send back to the homeland.
I wish you were able to shield that flag with 1 star blinding you and that religious thing on your sleeve that is weighing you down and take a look at things objectively.

I think we created some fund for Oklahoma bombing victims and the 9/11 victims's with a fund of some sort. Now we as a country regarding the USS Cole and the Embassy bombings in Africa, I am sure there's insurance policies on those things. ALso, I'm not quite sure which country you suggest we could demand to compensate us for those? As you should know Al Qaeda is not a country. I don't know how we as a country would get reparations from an organization versus the actual individual victims getting compensation from the organization through a lawsuit.
Israel receives lots of money from us, as well as is the only country that receives some special exemption regarding their citizens living in the USA, when buying Israeli bonds they are subject to interest tax but not part of the Deficit Reduction Act. Also all of the private fundraising that goes on under the guise of charity to raise money here to send back to the homeland.
I wish you were able to shield that flag with 1 star blinding you and that religious thing on your sleeve that is weighing you down and take a look at things objectively.

That is why the survivors want the US to charge Israel with war crimes.

He's their father, of course he should call his kids and talk to them.
No reason for any of that to affect a good relationship.

Lots of money and dead US servicemen...case in point: USS Liberty
Oil, gas, pipelines

They are our friends because we pay them and give them aid. They could care less about us or even peace with their neighbors. They will drag us into war unless we pull all aid from the region. Lets see how much they can do on their own for once.

There was nothing friendly about it. Israel was not our friend until many years later. It was cold calculated murder. There was no mistaken identity. That ship was providing signal intelligence to help prevent Israel from attacking its neighbors. Israel knew the ship's mission, that was why they attacked it.

Lots of money and dead US servicemen...case in point: USS Liberty
Oil, gas, pipelines

Lots of money and dead US servicemen...case in point: USS Liberty
Oil, gas, pipelines

Maybe even friendship if we would allow it.

you were quite judgmental of that poster before eekee clued you in. it might be very worthwhile to "know thy poster" and his/her applicable relationship history before developing a severe case of moral outrage.

Calm down Mr. Morality policeman...I'm legally separated from my wife. Maybe you'd do well to mind your own business and not come in here guns blazing.

Lots of money and dead US servicemen...case in point: USS Liberty
Oil, gas, pipelines

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-trice/dr-ron-paul-6-reasons-he-_b_1206274.html
Contrary to the false propaganda proclaiming that Dr. Ron Paul is "not electable", his numbers are rising, his support growing and he stands an excellent chance of winning both the GOP nomination and the 2012 presidential race.
Dr. Paul's opponents are desperate to stop Americans from listening to, and subsequently electing Ron Paul. Opponents of liberty falsely present Ron Paul as "unelectable" to the American people, attempting to plant subconscious seeds doubt of "don't listen to him, don't vote for him in the primaries or caucuses because he'll never win". This strategy is failing as more Americans hear Dr. Paul speak, leading them to contribute to his campaign and vote for him. The American public understands Dr. Paul's common sense approach and trusts him. The other candidates are clearly in the race to serve their egos and personal agendas. The "Dr. Paul is not electable" rumors are deliberately created and spread solely as a calculated attempt to confuse honest, hard-working American with falsehoods such as "Ron Paul is crazy, anti-women, anti-Israel and anti-blacks. He's isolationist, he'll wreck the country, he's anti-government". These are simple "control the masses" fear tactics to try and stop Americans from actually listening to Dr. Paul, hearing his logical and intelligent plan and deciding for themselves.
Dr. Paul went from third in Iowa, to second in New Hampshire and may win South Carolina. The new video about Romney's career, King of Bain, depicts Romney as a deceptive and greedy man with Wall Street connections who made his money destroying viable companies. The film portrays as Romney unnecessarily eliminating jobs of hard-working people while getting rich himself.
Romney is the unelectable candidate, not Dr. Paul.
6. Dr. Paul not an "isolationist". He is a veteran who believes in only going to war when it has been formally declared per the U.S. Constitution. "We shouldn't have so many injured and in our hospitals because we shouldn't go to war unless it's declared. If it's declared, we should go win it and get it over with." If he were an isolationist, what reason would he be the candidate who gets the most donations from people in the military? Dr. Paul wants to withdraw from the United Nations, which would be the Constitutional thing to do. Thomas Jefferson, founding father and an author of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution stated, "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none." Regarding Israel, Dr. Paul said "Two of the tenets of a true Zionist are 'self-determination' and 'self-reliance...We give $3 billion to Israel and $12 billion to her avowed enemies. How does that help Israel? And in return, we act like her master and demand veto power over her foreign policy." Ron Paul states, "Any kind of racism or anti-Semitism is incompatible with my philosophy." He is against foreign aid period. "I believe that federal foreign aid is absurd. We're broke!... It is ridiculous for us to be borrowing money from China and giving it to Pakistan. I have described foreign aid as taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries. I know that many in other nations are hurting, but I also know that the American people are a generous people. While we should end the unconstitutional federal foreign aid program, I would encourage Americans to continue to voluntarily contribute to the needs of other nations."
5. Dr. Ron Paul would run the U.S. budget like many of us responsibly handle our money at home: Spending less than we make and getting rid of dishonest or unnecessary waste.
4. Dr. Paul's plans for the country make sense.
3. Dr. Paul has the right track record, temperament and character to be President. He is mentally clear, firm and tells the truth.
2. He is the only one who makes sense in the debates. If you watch the debates, he answers questions directly and honestly. The link in this paragraph lists the upcoming debates. Many traditional Democrats might find themselves voting for Dr. Paul after watching him in a few debates.
1. Dr. Paul is the only person in the 2012 race for president who wants to serve the country. All the other candidates like the idea of the power, status, glory and success. Dr. Paul has humility and a humble approach that no other candidate has.
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." - Thomas Jefferson