Age limit of joint sponsor?

[tomuk 25]

Hi,

 

first I would like to say that I looked for this information and haven't found anything. So the question is:

Is there any top age limit of joint sponsor? The question is not only if there is anything in the law, but also if someone experienced anything about this topic.

Story is that great grandmother offered to be as joint sponsor at the age of 97. She has some retirement income + owns the house.

 

At the end: visa is CR-1.

[JeanneAdil 6,560]

immigration  can not discriminate because of age (but they will probably ask for a different cosponsor)

On This Page. Under the laws enforced by EEOC, it is illegal to discriminate against someone (applicant or employee) because of that person's race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

because retirement income ends when person is gone 

 

[tomuk 25]

4 minutes ago, JeanneAdil said:

immigration  can not discriminate because of age (but they will probably ask for a different cosponsor)

On This Page. Under the laws enforced by EEOC, it is illegal to discriminate against someone (applicant or employee) because of that person's race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

because retirement income ends when person is gone 

 

Thank you for the answer. Income from job ends when person is gone, too.

Edited August 5, 2019 by tomuk

[geowrian 22,337]

They can not deny purely due to age, but there can still be a concern of ability to ensure you will not become a public charge.

[tomuk 25]

42 minutes ago, geowrian said:

They can not deny purely due to age, but there can still be a concern of ability to ensure you will not become a public charge.

Understand that. Assets won't help?

[geowrian 22,337]

1 hour ago, tomuk said:

Understand that. Assets won't help?

Assets would be part of the public charge consideration, sure.