Jump to content

208 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, IAMX said:

Forcing businesses that can't afford that percentage increase to their expenses will drive them out of businesses. Clearly high school economics hadn't taught you enough about how businesses function which is why you think corporate centric economic policies work just fine for the vast majority of other businesses. Gotta love liberal imagination. Hence why business owners tend to vote conservatively while inane lefties fruitlessly wish them out of business. 

Why do you automatically think that this percentaged based payroll is going to cut so sharply into a companies profit margin that it will put them out of business. It's percentage based for a reason. Do you know what a percentage of something is? The percentage is based on the companies prior years profits. If a business cannot afford a percentage based payroll then they aren't profitable enough and probably shouldn't be in business to begin with.

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, IAMX said:

No one is suggesting give more other people's money to corporate CEOs, it's genius liberals who are suggesting taking away from all business owners to undeservingly give more money to bottom rung employees cuz I said so. Crappy policy not made with any semblance of business nor economic knowledge. 100% social justice. 

It appears that after many attempts you still haven't grasped what is being discussed here.

Posted (edited)

Never understood the Right's fascination and love in with the Rich. Probably because they fall hook, line and sinker about the American Dream and how you'll become a millionaire one day. 

Also the pity they take on businesses, look at Europe, higher taxes, employees are paid better, businesses seem to do OK over there.

Edited by JimandChristy

K1 Visa Timeline
15th Dec 08 - I129F posted to VSC
1st June 09 - Interview at 9am, Medical at 2:50pm
15th June 09 - K1 Visa approved and received
23rd June 09 - Point of Entry (Atlanta, Georgia)
17th July 09 - Married


AOS + EAD + AP Timeline
25th Aug 09 - AOS + EAD + AP posted to Chicago Lockbox
2nd Oct 09 - EAD + AP Approved
22nd Oct 09 - AOS Approved
30th Oct 09 - Green Card in hand!


Removing Conditions Timeline
29th Sept 11 - I-751 posted to VSC
26th Sept 12 - Approved

 

Citizenship Timeline

20th Feb 15 - N-400 posted to Lewisville Lockbox

15th June 15 - Interview

1st July 15 - Oath Ceremony

NOW A US CITIZEN!

Country:
Timeline
Posted
Just now, Teddy B said:

Why do you automatically think that this percentaged based payroll is going to cut so sharply into a companies profit margin that it will put them out of business. It's percentage based for a reason. Do you know what a percentage of something is? The percentage is based on the companies prior years profits. If a business cannot afford a percentage based payroll then they aren't profitable enough and probably shouldn't be in business to begin with.

 

 

Percentage is a euphemism. If you are getting literal, the wage increase is an arbitrary dollar amount. If you knew anything about budgeting you'd know how slim profits are and that the sheer weight adding that much expense to a small business is going to have the opposite effect intended. Companies (that even survive) reduce their overhead which in this case comes from labor so less employees, less hours, etc. The only businesses that don't get hurt by this or have it minimized are the mega corporations who can easily shift overhead around with minimal effect. 

 

Now one can see why business owners tend to be conservative, liberals are all imagination and no practicality. 

 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
24 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

The right have no idea what Socialism is, it's just a word they throw out there to scare people. Socialism is already here but they don't even know it.

 

13 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

I wonder if those people walk into their bosses office and refuse salary increases because that's SOCIALIST!

 

Boss: Congratulations Winston!

Winston Oh, why?

Boss: The company is happy with your performance, and we’re getting a 10% raise effective immediately.

Winston: Are you mad?

Boss: What?

Winston: You heard me. Are you mad? Are you insane?

Boss: I don’t know what you mean?

Winston: You darn socialist. You can’t give me a raise. You shouldn’t give me a raise.

Boss: But we thought you would appreciate we’re pleased with you.

Winston: You fool. You need the money more than I do. Your lifestyle is more expensive than mine. You have more to lose than I do.

Boss; But..

Winston: No buts. You’re just stupid and you should get fired.

Boss: Don’t push it Winston

Winston: Better yet. I quit. I don’t want to work for a socialist organization Gonna find me a job where I’m exploited and underpaid.

(WALKS OUT AND SLAMS THE DOOR BEHIND HIM)

 

Lets spin the pilot to Fox as a sitcom

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, IAMX said:

Percentage is a euphemism. If you are getting literal, the wage increase is an arbitrary dollar amount. If you knew anything about budgeting you'd know how slim profits are and that the sheer weight adding that much expense to a small business is going to have the opposite effect intended. Companies (that even survive) reduce their overhead which in this case comes from labor so less employees, less hours, etc. The only businesses that don't get hurt by this or have it minimized are the mega corporations who can easily shift overhead around with minimal effect. 

 

Now one can see why business owners tend to be conservative, liberals are all imagination and no practicality. 

 

Liberals..not left.. double shot on Liberals 

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, IAMX said:

Now one can see why business owners tend to be conservative, liberals are all imagination and no practicality. 

 

Business owners tend to be conservative because the "conservative fiscal policies" typically make it easier for the business owners to focus the wealth in their pockets. The belief in "trickle down economics" allows for a great "friendly slogan" when in reality most "business owners", when given the chance, will plug those holes and cut the trickle off to benefit themselves.

 

In short, they tend to be "fiscally conservative" because that is code for making them more wealthy. It isn't about the health of their business, it's about the health of their bank account.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, IAMX said:

Percentage is a euphemism. If you are getting literal, the wage increase is an arbitrary dollar amount. If you knew anything about budgeting you'd know how slim profits are and that the sheer weight adding that much expense to a small business is going to have the opposite effect intended. Companies (that even survive) reduce their overhead which in this case comes from labor so less employees, less hours, etc. The only businesses that don't get hurt by this or have it minimized are the mega corporations who can easily shift overhead around with minimal effect. 

 

Now one can see why business owners tend to be conservative, liberals are all imagination and no practicality. 

 

No I am fairly sure Percentage is not a euphemism.  I get a percentage of my companies profits and I have never seen any literally device in the envelope.

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, bcking said:

Business owners tend to be conservative because the "conservative fiscal policies" typically make it easier for the business owners to focus the wealth in their pockets. The belief in "trickle down economics" allows for a great "friendly slogan" when in reality most "business owners", when given the chance, will plug those holes and cut the trickle off to benefit themselves.

 

In short, they tend to be "fiscally conservative" because that is code for making them more wealthy. It isn't about the health of their business, it's about the health of their bank account.

 

Business owners tend to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal. 

Country:
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, bcking said:

Business owners tend to be conservative because the "conservative fiscal policies" typically make it easier for the business owners to focus the wealth in their pockets. The belief in "trickle down economics" allows for a great "friendly slogan" when in reality most "business owners", when given the chance, will plug those holes and cut the trickle off to benefit themselves.

 

In short, they tend to be "fiscally conservative" because that is code for making them more wealthy. It isn't about the health of their business, it's about the health of their bank account.

Who's arguing here for trickle down economics? This is about forcing businesses to arbitrarily incur massive expenses because leftists think they know how to run businesses better than business owners do, or stereotype the vast majority of business owners the same as corporate CEOs. Idiocy in its purest form. 

Posted
1 minute ago, CaliCat said:

 

Business owners tend to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal. 

The only person I know that voted for Trump is actually one of my best friends. We've gotten into arguments about it several times, but he has always been honest and has said that bottom line he did it because he knew he and his family would personally end up better off (wealthier) with Trump as President. His family is worth somewhere on the low side of 9 figures.

 

Most very wealthy people, if you know them personally, will be very honest about this. They vote for fiscal conservatives because they want more money, despite already being incredibly well off. Even my father, who is worth somewhere in the 7 figures, always said that he would vote fiscally conservative so that he could make more money. It's never about benefiting employees or the "little people" in businesses.

Posted
3 minutes ago, IAMX said:

Who's arguing here for trickle down economics? This is about forcing businesses to arbitrarily incur massive expenses because leftists think they know how to run businesses better than business owners do, or stereotype the vast majority of business owners the same as corporate CEOs. Idiocy in its purest form. 

Sorry just to clarify...

 

Is the "massive expense" we are talking about right now paying employees a fair wage?

 

If so I'll go back to something I said earlier. If you can't do that, I'd say your business deserves to go under.

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
Just now, bcking said:

The only person I know that voted for Trump is actually one of my best friends. We've gotten into arguments about it several times, but he has always been honest and has said that bottom line he did it because he knew he and his family would personally end up better off (wealthier) with Trump as President. His family is worth somewhere on the low side of 9 figures.

 

Most very wealthy people, if you know them personally, will be very honest about this. They vote for fiscal conservatives because they want more money, despite already being incredibly well off. Even my father, who is worth somewhere in the 7 figures, always said that he would vote fiscally conservative so that he could make more money. It's never about benefiting employees or the "little people" in businesses.

 

There is nothing wrong about being fiscally conservative, and that's something many Americans need to learn. There is nothing wrong with having more money, but a little conscience is also required to run a successful business. I mentioned In-N-Out burgers in an earlier thread. The owners are rich and treat their employees with the dignity they deserve, and they're just a burger joint!

 

Country:
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, bcking said:

The only person I know that voted for Trump is actually one of my best friends. We've gotten into arguments about it several times, but he has always been honest and has said that bottom line he did it because he knew he and his family would personally end up better off (wealthier) with Trump as President. His family is worth somewhere on the low side of 9 figures.

 

Most very wealthy people, if you know them personally, will be very honest about this. They vote for fiscal conservatives because they want more money, despite already being incredibly well off. Even my father, who is worth somewhere in the 7 figures, always said that he would vote fiscally conservative so that he could make more money. It's never about benefiting employees or the "little people" in businesses.

So how many business owners make a net income of 9 figures? Since we're basing our thought of wealthy people around this. 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, IAMX said:

So how many business owners make a net income of 9 figures? Since we're basing our thought of wealthy people around this. 

I was giving an example of someone wealthy personally explaining to me why he votes a certain way. You were asking why business owners tend to vote fiscally conservative. The examples of people I know personally all will tell me it is ultimately for them to be wealthier. I obviously can't claim to know every single business owner though. My father inheirited a "small business" (a medical practice) and thought/voted the same way. It wasn't for his employees. It was for his own personal wealth. I have other examples.

Edited by bcking
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...