Utah bill seeks to take down 'Zion Curtain' in restaurants

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Utah is well-known for its strict and complex liquor laws. Under the legislation being proposed by Republican state Representative Kraig Powell, most restaurants that serve alcohol would need to have a separate bar or lounge area from which children are prohibited.

Under current regulations designed to protect children, restaurants that opened after May 2009 may only dispense alcohol in an area separated from the food consumption area "by a solid, translucent, permanent" barrier so that the process is not visible to patrons.

Powell's new bill says that in addition to having a child-free area, restaurants must post signs at all entrances "stating in large letters that: 'Notice: This establishment prepares and dispenses alcoholic products in public view.'"

http://news.yahoo.com/utah-bill-seeks-down-zion-curtain-restaurants-214319830.html

Utah weird.

[decocker 7,198]

really weird.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

really weird.

Let's talk about Mormon's instead of Muslims.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Utah weird.

Just like smoking in Restaurants, people should be able to make their own choices without a nanny state. If you don't want your kids to see someone being served a drink, don't carry them there. Simple enough

Same thing with smoking. I would not patronize a place, full of smoke, but it seems like it is the owners choice.

Let's talk about Mormon's instead of Muslims.

Please because, their global network of terror has me nervous

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Just like smoking in Restaurants,

No. Smoking is wrong. Period.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I went into a Native American casino a few months ago, where California's no-gag rule does not apply. I gagged. I sure don't miss that.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

No. Smoking is wrong. Period.

I agree but so is telling someone they can't allow it in their own establishment

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I agree but so is telling someone they can't allow it in their own establishment

Fine, as long as they don't serve the public, or have any employees. Hell, if someone wants to cook meth for personal use in their own homes, why should we stop them?

[decocker 7,198]

Hell, if someone wants to cook meth for personal use in their own homes, why should we stop them?

because it's too easy to blow up your neighbors.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Fine, as long as they don't serve the public, or have any employees. Hell, if someone wants to cook meth for personal use in their own homes, why should we stop them?

We shouldn't

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

because it's too easy to blow up your neighbors.

Another reason not to live in a trailer park.

[decocker 7,198]

Another reason not to live in a trailer park.

home meth labs aren't just for trailer parks anymore. apartment complexes, townhomes, suburbia..kaboom.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

home meth labs aren't just for trailer parks anymore. apartment complexes, townhomes, suburbia..kaboom.

Coming from an expert, I'll take that as the truth.

[decocker 7,198]

Coming from an expert, I'll take that as the truth.

thank you for the compliment. i graduated DARE in 1987. before meth. it's called 'a thirst for knowledge'

[spookyturtle 9,466]

thank you for the compliment. i graduated DARE in 1987. before meth. it's called 'a thirst for knowledge'

Wink wink.