Jump to content
Janelle2002

Illegals File Suit Against DHS to Stop Deportations

 Share

30 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Illegals File Suit Against DHS to Stop Deportations

Thursday, 13 Nov 2014 07:56 AM

By Elliot Jager

Close
More ways to share...
A group of illegal immigrants have filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security demanding that deportations be halted until President Barack Obama clarifies his amnesty plans, The Washington Post reported.

The National Day Laborer Organizing Network, the advocacy group behind the lawsuit, wants deportations frozen and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
program expanded.

The group had filed a petition in February with DHS demanding the "temporary suspension of deportations for the millions of undocumented immigrants who would likely benefit from near–term congressional action on immigration."

It says DHS has a legal obligation under the Federal Administrative Procedure Act not to ignore its pleading.

"What the law says is, they have to respond in a reasonable amount of time," according to National Day Laborer Organizing Network attorney Jessica Karp Bansal. "In a case like this where peoples' lives are at stake, nine months is clearly unreasonable," the Post reported.

The president has promised executive action before the end of 2014 if Congress does not act, and the lawsuit is aimed at pushing the administration forward.


"This point is an important moment to push for action because the administration has made so many statements that they're going to act, but they keep delaying and delaying," said Thomas Fritzche, another attorney involved in the case.

Leading up to the midterm elections, members of the network heckled Obama on several occasions as he campaigned for Democratic candidates, calling on him to stop deportations of illegal immigrants, Politico reported.

The group complained in its petition that the rate of deportations "has skyrocketed" to nearly 2 million expulsions, "with more deportations occurring in the past 10 years than in the previous 110 years combined."

Homeland Security did not comment on the lawsuit, the Post reported.



Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/illegals-amnesty-Homeland-Security-lawsuit/2014/11/13/id/607090/#ixzz3Iy7o1Hew

Ow this is priceless!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol...

The only country where illegals have more rights than legals.

Why don't these illegals start following the country laws first!

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

The law affords them the right to file a lawsuit. They are following the law in that regards...

lol...

The only country where illegals have more rights than legals.

Why don't these illegals start following the country laws first!

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

The law affords them the right to file a lawsuit. They are following the law in that regards...

Yes. They take advantage of one law that helps their (unworthy) cause, while breaking a multitude of others. Bravo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The law affords them the right to file a lawsuit. They are following the law in that regards...

Then it is a stupid law that afford the illegal to exploit.

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

It is certainly not a stupid law. It's the same law that affords you and I and others, the right to redress our grievances. I don't think it is being exploited either, and I will reserve judgment until the suit is over. At that point we will be able to assess how well our legal system works.

Then it is a stupid law that afford the illegal to exploit.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

The law doesn't allow us to file a lawsuit against the embassies. They are blocked with the doctrine of consular non-reviewability.

Why do they get to do something we can't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

Good for you. The embassies represent several US agencies. If you have a specific issue with the USCIS you should sue the agency.

You sue the auto maker, not the dealership.

The law doesn't allow us to file a lawsuit against the embassies. They are blocked with the doctrine of consular non-reviewability.

Why do they get to do something we can't do.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

US legal system releases illegal criminals of serious crimes back to local communities, instead of deporting them right away.

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for you. The embassies represent several US agencies. If you have a specific issue with the USCIS you should sue the agency.

You sue the auto maker, not the dealership.

You should be able to sue the ones that did you wrong. Can't bring suit against USCIS if they are not the ones that lied about our inadmissibility.

If I can let me know.

Edited by Janelle2002
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

Alas, you should. If you can prove a consular officer did something illegal while serving as an agent for the USCIS you can sue. The problem you'll have in making a case is the cost it will take you to serve all the subpoenas and obtain all the depositions you would need in order to have a winning case. However, if you've got deep pockets it is not out of your reach.

You should be able to sue the ones that did you wrong. Can't bring suit against USCIS if they are not the ones that lied about our inadmissibility.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alas, you should. If you can prove a consular officer did something illegal while serving as an agent for the USCIS you can sue. The problem you'll have in making a case is the cost it will take you to serve all the subpoenas and obtain all the depositions you would need in order to have a winning case. However, if you've got deep pockets it is not out of your reach.

Mmmm hmmmmmm I need to investigate this more. I was told it was better to fit it in the I-601 waiver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, if you've got deep pockets it is not out of your reach.

Alas, if Janelle had deep pockets she would not be shopping for a bargain spouse outside of the US. :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...