IRS Admits to Court it Hasn’t Searched for Missing Lerner Emails

[spookyturtle 9,465]

You only seem to have questions. I originally asked you for an explanation of why the CIA felt the need to hack into the Senate Intelligence Committee's computers. You have yet to answer. You answer, I'll answer.

I've written this here SO many times, and you have yet to react substantively to it: there is really no comparison to the level of lawlessness and unconstitutional shenanigans of this preznit. None. If you could disprove this, you would. Go ahead. You can('t) do it.

I asked you what you were going to do when Obama is gone. You're the one who posts like a broken record everyday. When asked for answers, you deflect. Do you think he will be impeached come January? How will your life personally change with a 100% Republican government? Do you expect major reform early next year? Do you expect Obama to be prosecuted? Will your party truly take the bull by the horns and do the right thing for America? You talk a lot but offer no opinion or solutions, just the same thing over and over.

Give me the solutions since you have all the answers.

Edited November 6, 2014 by spookyturtle

[UncleBeer 244]

When asked for answers, you deflect.

And yet you fail to answer the earlier question I posed in post #10. As always, if you had cogent answers, you'd provide them.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

[Rob L 3,811]

And yet you fail to answer the earlier question I posed in post #10. As always, if you had cogent answers, you'd provide them.

I cant sleep, maybe if you are up you I can be lulled back with some of your banality

The CIA admitted, after initially denying( or failing to admit) that they were monitoring a specific network for activity. The breach became known when DEMOCRATIC Senator Feinstein went public with these comments

"She said in a statement on the Senate floorthat she although she had been "trying to resolve this dispute in a discreet and respectful way," she had "grave concerns that the CIA's search may well have violated the separation of powers principles embodied in the US Constitution.""

These comments on March 11 were after two letters sent by Senator Feinstein in January were ignored. ( Career hint for those moving up the spook ladder, try to respond to the written concerns of the Senate Chair of the Intelligence committee)

"The independent computer network that the CIA tapped was established in 2009 for Congress to review CIA documents during an investigation into alleged torture and abuse in a detention and interrogation program from the George W. Bush administration" ( CNET July of this year)

Public airing could have been avoided by answering the question in a timely manner.Stupid ? Yes Oliver Stone material? Probably not At the direction of the White House? No

its the oldest question for the second oldest profession:

nos qui per custodes qui custodit

Edited November 6, 2014 by Rob L

[UncleBeer 244]

I cant sleep, maybe if you are up you I can be lulled back with some of your banality

That's uncalled for. Why not just pose your question instead of adding an insult?

The CIA admitted, after initially denying( or failing to admit) that they were monitoring a specific network for activity.

So: they tried to duck the inquiry from their oversight committee, twice (reminiscent of recent IRS and DOJ tactics, right?) And now you're gonna believe their version that they were only "monitoring for activity". Pretty naive.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Let me guess, the Dem's control the CIA?

You got it!

Meanwhile...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

So it's a conspiracy? Obama is out to get the Republican's? He has the CIA spy on the Republican senators and Congressmen?

Out of curiosity, who are you going to blame things on when Obama is gone? Especially if there is a Republican presnit, Congress and Senate?

The libanistas still blaming Bush and Reagan so I figure we got a while

[Rob L 3,811]

That's uncalled for. Why not just pose your question instead of adding an insult?

So: they tried to duck the inquiry from their oversight committee, twice (reminiscent of recent IRS and DOJ tactics, right?) And now you're gonna believe their version that they were only "monitoring for activity". Pretty naive.

If you are going to quote me please use the context. I never said we should take the statement at face value, just that It does not appear to be motivated by party politics

[spookyturtle 9,465]

And yet you fail to answer the earlier question I posed in post #10. As always, if you had cogent answers, you'd provide them.

Another deflection.

You got it!

Meanwhile...

When is the vote to see who controls the CIA?

[Rob L 3,811]

Another deflection.

When is the vote to see who controls the CIA?

The final summation on the CIAs actions in the Senate "snooping" affair is presented here: They learned not to do it again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46h7oP9eiBk

[UncleBeer 244]

Well, well: this should prove interesting. How long does it take to redact 30,000 emails?

Up to 30,000 missing emails sent by former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner have been recovered by the IRS inspector general, five months after they were deemed lost forever.

The U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) informed congressional staffers from several committees on Friday that the emails were found among hundreds of “disaster recovery tapes” that were used to back up the IRS email system.

“They just said it took them several weeks and some forensic effort to get these emails off these tapes,” a congressional aide told the Washington Examiner.

Committees in the House and Senate are seeking the emails, which they believe could show Lerner was working in concert with Obama administration officials to target conservative and Tea Party groups seeking tax-exempt status before the 2012 presidential election.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Well, well: this should prove interesting. How long does it take to redact 30,000 emails?

Isn't odd they found them about the time we are getting a new senate that will no longer cover for their lying. The lying about the Emails became commercial. Anyone with any Network Admin knowledge knew it was a lie.

This is kind of like the Iranians releasing the hostages as Reagan was being sworn in. They knew it was game over .

Well, well: this should prove interesting. How long does it take to redact 30,000 emails?

Isn't odd they found them about the time we are getting a new senate that will no longer cover for their lying. The lying about the Emails became commercial. Anyone with any Network Admin knowledge knew it was a lie.

This is kind of like the Iranians releasing the hostages as Reagan was being sworn in. They knew it was game over .

Well, well: this should prove interesting. How long does it take to redact 30,000 emails?

Isn't odd they found them about the time we are getting a new senate that will no longer cover for their lying. The lying about the Emails became commercial. Anyone with any Network Admin knowledge knew it was a lie.

This is kind of like the Iranians releasing the hostages as Reagan was being sworn in. They knew it was game over .

[UncleBeer 244]

Turns out Lerner couldn't see her way clear to approve (or even consider!) tax exempt status for nasty ol' conservatives, but she had no problem granting that status to an underage prostitution ring. Everyone's OK with that, right?

This seemingly boring property tax story began when attorney Ron Pruitt filed nonprofit incorporation documents with Texas’ Secretary of State on 7/11/2003.These documents were then filed with the IRS, where Lois Lerner, the former Director of Exempt Organization Rulings and Agreements, decided the Royal Order of Jesters deserved 501©(3) status as a charity and, on July 24, 2004, approved their application that classified their new headquarters as a “museum.” The Jesters then filed as a foreign corporation business entity with the Secretary of State of Indiana to qualify their new Indianapolis headquarters for property tax exemption. Additionally, the Jesters were afforded other nonprofit benefits including reduced postal rates, possible exemption from state income, sales, and employment taxes, tax-deductible contributions and exemption from Federal income tax. According to About.com, “Tax-exempt means that a nonprofit (1) does not pay taxes to the federal government and (2) that its donors can take a tax deduction for their donations to the organization.”

When the Jester news broke four years ago, we learned from the Buffalo News that a New York state Supreme Court judge resigned after the FBI caught him and two other Jesters in a human trafficking sting. These included his law clerk and a retired Lockport police captain. A retired Erie County Sheriff pleaded guilty last April to driving a limo of prostitutes from the Buffalo New York airport to a national Jester convention in Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada in April, 2005 and not reporting the felony to authorities. The Judge testified in his plea agreement that he worked with national officials to make sure prostitutes got to a national Jester meeting in Niagara Falls, Ontario. The same plea agreement discloses that the Jesters are under federal investigation for sex trafficking, prostitution and child sex tourism.

The other story I broke four years ago reported that a group of 19 Jesters were on a witness list and were expected to testify about their first hand knowledge of sex with minor girls while on a fishing trip to Brazil. The list included national Jester director Samuel “Scutter” Newton.

The former fishing tour operator who organized the Jester fishing trip is currently being prosecuted by Brazilian authorities for trafficking underage girls into prostitution for his North American fishing clients. He is also under criminal investigation by a grand jury in Miami for child sex tourism and has been sued by four Brazilian women who claim he trafficked them into prostitution while minors.

The depositions of five Brazilian girls describe how one was left pregnant at age 13 after one such fishing trip. Fishing guides took pictures of Jesters having sex with minor girls and surrendered them to the Brazilian Federal Police. The fishing guides testified in the same case that the Jesters asked to be called “Masons” and for girls over 13. It is not yet known if these Jesters are among the twenty fishing customers currently under investigation by the Brazilian Senate.

Here is how the feds describe the Jesters in the Sheriff’s plea agreement.

“The Royal Order of Jesters (“ROJ”) is a worldwide fraternal organization whose membership is limited to individuals invited to join by other members. The motto of the ROJ is ‘mirth is king.’ The ROJ has local chapters or ‘courts.’ On occasion, a local court or group of local courts in the same geographical area sponsor social gatherings known as ‘books of the play’ or ‘books.’ The sponsoring courts organize the ‘books’ and arrange for food, lodging, and entertainment at the ‘books.’ The ROJ also sponsors a yearly national ‘book,’ the equivalent of a national convention. In April, 2005, the Jester’s national book was held in Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada. As set forth below, a typical feature of a ‘book of the play’ is the presence of prostitutes (‘Jester Girls’) who engage in commercial sex acts with members of the ROJ. Arrangements for the prostitutes are generally made by the organizer of the ‘books,’ or the region hosting the national ‘book.’ On occasion, individual Jesters make arrangements to transport prostitutes to ‘books.’”