Who do you think is VJ's biggest GZ supporter?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Keep it clean.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Every VJ gun nut. Equally.

Edited July 11, 2013 by Mr. Big Dog

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Every VJ gun nut. Equally.

I'm a gun owner and nobody I know would consider me a gun nut. And being a gun owner has nothing to do with where I stand on the case thus far.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I'm a gun owner and nobody I know would consider me a gun nut.

I wasn't talking about you. The gun nuts know who they are.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Keep it clean.

I think you started out some what of TM supporter but have progressed to a pretty firm GZ supporter as the facts have come out.

I started out as a GZ lean , went to slight TM lean on day 1 and 2, then swung back to strong GZ as the trial played out.

I am sure now I would rank in the top 5 GZ backers.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I started out as a GZ lean , went to slight TM lean on day 1 and 2, then swung back to strong GZ as the trial played out.

Who is supposed to take that seriously given your documented dancing on the dead teens grave?

Travon was a racist street thug that hated authority. Mama kicked him out. School kicked him out ,tweets from a friend that suggest a hammering on a bus driver. , He saw George looking at him and he stalked George with the intent to kill him ....He was the only one talked about killing. Looks like he tried to make it come true.A street thug made a bad decision after he was stoned.

and that my friends. Is the plain truth

[GandD 5,966]

Spooks, you're cracking me up with these threads.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Me.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I am Travyon Martin.

[GandD 5,966]

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Just because someone thinks he should be acquitted according to the evidence presented and the application of the law doesn't elevate him to sainthood. It doesn't take away his contribution to the incident. Doubt. Very easy for one to have sat there for two weeks and have doubt, IMO.

[mota bhai 2,675]

Just because someone thinks he should be acquitted according to the evidence presented and the application of the law doesn't elevate him to sainthood. It doesn't take away his contribution to the incident. Doubt. Very easy for one to have sat there for two weeks and have doubt, IMO.

The doubt must be reasonable, where every individual juror gets to decide what is or isn't reasonable.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Just because someone thinks he should be acquitted according to the evidence presented and the application of the law doesn't elevate him to sainthood.

The same way thinking GZ made some wrong decisions doesn't mean someone thinks TM is "saint skittles" or whatever stupid name people come up with.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

The doubt must be reasonable, where every individual juror gets to decide what is or isn't reasonable.

That is why I think he will be acquitted. Look at the variation here on VJ. Now compose a jury with Gary, MBD, Steven, me, you and Nature Boy. Hung jury.

[mota bhai 2,675]

That is why I think he will be acquitted. Look at the variation here on VJ. Now compose a jury with Gary, MBD, Steven, me, you and Nature Boy. Hung jury.

Put us all in a room, close the door, and tell us we have to have a verdict so we can go home.

Watch how quickly opinions can sometimes coalesce.