Jump to content
hellomms

A Radical Idea

 Share

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Pakistan
Timeline

Here is an idea that I am not sure will ever become a reality but I think its worth the debate, not sure if there are lawyers who could also shed some light.

USCIS should refund the I-751 fee if the ROC petition isn't adjudicated by the time petitioner applies for Citizenship under 'Naturalization for Spouses of U.S. Citizens' and here is why:

  1. The evidence provided for N-400 or Citizenship includes the evidence provided for I-751 as the requirement under 'Naturalization for Spouses of U.S. Citizens' is that you are currently married in good faith, same as in ROC
  2. USCIS can not prove that (a) the ROC petition adjudication went through the same level of effort as the other ROC cases, and (b) that the ROC adjudication was not due to the fact that they reviewed the evidence for the Citizenship application
  3. With (1) and (2) above, it is therefore plausible to say that USCIS did not render the (ROC) service it was paid to do

I am sure there are a lot of other what-if situations to be considered but when a petitioner files for the Citizenship with an un-adjudicated ROC case, we all know that it forces USCIS to make a decision on ROC (likely approve or possibly deny). USCIS is operating under a quasi business model where one pays for the service he/she would like to receive and it is apparent here that when one simultaneously pays for both "services" it is unclear whether one actually gets the service they paid for

I understand that this is a Citizenship process with a governmental organization but its the model they adopted, you pay to get the service so why should the rules be different for this process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: India
Timeline

I would say " NO Refund ". Even ROC is not done in timely manner, it doesnt mean that they never touched your file. Each case is unique, and may take its own time.

XrVRp5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Honestly, applying for Naturalization on a 3 year rule is a privilege. Everyone else has to wait 5 years. So yeah, we pay two fees in quick succession, so what?

All in all, it is a benefit for us (USC), from our government, to bring our loved ones here. And to be honest, the fees for the whole process are not exuberant.

Слава Україні!

--------------------
Full Timeline

chimpanzee.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: India
Timeline

Honestly, applying for Naturalization on a 3 year rule is a privilege. Everyone else has to wait 5 years. So yeah, we pay two fees in quick succession, so what?

All in all, it is a benefit for us (USC), from our government, to bring our loved ones here. And to be honest, the fees for the whole process are not exuberant.

I agree - each process has costs associated with it and fees provide the necessary finance at least to break-even. Well there is always a wastage in every area, including in our own personal finances. So I say no refund please.

USA

01/08/13 - Approved and GC is order for production on 1/8/14

09/12/13 - Case transferred to CSC. NOA2 received on 09/18/13

08/30/13 - Biometrics Done - No walk ins allowed at this LSC (received on 8/16/13).

08/05/13 - NOA1 (received on 08/10/13)

08/01/13 - Mailed I-751 (received on 8/2/13 - check cashed on 8/5/13)

12/28/11 - Received SSN (applied on 12/20/11, as we didn't get based on DS-230 options)
11/28/11 - Received Green Card (Expires on 10/30/13) - Welcome Letter on 11/17/11
10/30/11 - POE - Houston, TX

Chennai Consulate (40 days)
10/28/11 - Received Visa papers and Passport at VFS
10/25/11 - Interview Cleared Successfully (Spouse was not allowed in)

NVC: (90 days from NOA2 to Consulate)
08/31/11 - Case Completed (Interview 10/25/11) - Received at Chennai on 09/19/11
07/22/11 - NVC Case Number

USCIS: (92 days)

6/21/11 - NOA2 (NOA1 on 3/25/11) - took a month to get to NVC
3/21/11 - I-130 sent to USCIS Lockbox, Chicago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...