Tagg Romney Invested in Ohio Electronic Voting Machines

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

It's peculiar that Right Wingers are so concerned about voter fraud as in people who ineligible to vote, but seem uninterested in the mountain of evidence that these electronic voting machines are susceptible to fraud. This shouldn't be a partisan issue. This is about the threat of our democracy.

we are biased.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

You missed the points made. For one, the Republican Party is heavily connected financially to these electronic voting machines - doesn't matter which company Second, it's been proven that these machines by design, are susceptible to fraud. And if you're wondering whether HART machines are immune to such hacking...

from PC World (hardly a left wing conspiracy site):

U.S. Presidential Election Can Be Hacked

The California audit examined systems from Diebold Elections Systems, Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems, ultimately permitting their use in 2008, but only under certain conditions. In testing, Wagner and his team found that they could introduce a computer virus to any of the three systems, which would then spread throughout the county and ultimately skew the vote count.

.....

About a quarter of the votes cast in the upcoming election will be on electronic voting equipment with no paper trail, Wagner said. And even the states that keep paper records are not necessarily checking their results. Only about a third of all states have records that are regularly audited.

......

Recently, Princeton computer science professor Ed Felten was threatened with legal action after New Jersey counties asked him to review Sequoia AVC Advantage voting machines.

There is so much mistrust between the two communities, it is hard for them to communicate, said Alec Yasinsac, an associate professor at Florida State University. "It's very hard for the academics to approach the vendors," he said. Vendors worry that if they talk to security researchers, it might be tantamount to admitting that they have bugs.

"I think voting system vendors today are where Microsoft was 10 years ago," Wagner said.

http://www.pcworld.c...31/article.html

The machines are way less vulnerable to fraud than a paper ballot stuffed in a freaking box, with a biased human counting marks on a paper and writing the results on a piece of paper. You have no clue what your talking about and the majority of the articles you quote don't indicate jack squat about any electronic voter fraud. Your just pre searching for some wing nut excuse to blame in case Obama loses. You just need to accept the fact if he loses it was because he sucked.

Do you really think anyone could have any proof of any widespread voter fraud in Ohio and it could be covered up by anyone..

Just say tell people gas was cheap back then because the economy was bad but yet it cents 4 dollars a gallon know and the economy is worse. It makes more sense.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

It's peculiar that Right Wingers are so concerned about voter fraud as in people who ineligible to vote, but seem uninterested in the mountain of evidence that these electronic voting machines are susceptible to fraud. This shouldn't be a partisan issue. This is about the threat of our democracy.

If there was mountains of evidence the Democratic party would be in court getting an injunction. All there is are speculative articles reposted by someone who I think has had their tinfoil hat fall off.

[Ban Hammer 12,829]

i remember there was a huge thing about the voting machines when bush was running for reelection. then everything was mysteriously quiet when obama ran in 08. now this subject is back again. i'm seeing a pattern.