Well that didn't take long. Army General charged with SODOMY.

[^_^ 5,021]

Who cares? Spelling is not a measurement of intelligence, nor is it an indication of the quality of education a person has had. Even if it did, it's not Danno's fault, but an example of failed public school system that allowed Danno to fall through the cracks.

Be nice, commie.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Be nice, commie.

I am being nice. You want to blame the victim. I'm blaming the socialist system that failed him.

[JohnR! 5,495]

I just saw a brief report in the news on this. It referred to some of the charges having to do with FEMALE subordinates! Don't know if that precludes the possibility that homosexual issues may still be involved but it seems likely. Just as an FYI, the term 'sodomy' as used in legal documents, refers to many sexual acts other than 'normal' #######/####### penetration. It includes such things as oral sex for instance. So all those out there that immediately jumped on this as some sort of proof of the repeal of DADT being a bad idea got this wrong in multiple ways!

You are absolutely correct. Many do not realize that if this code were to be followed to the letter, there would be no man or woman left in our military.

According to the UCMJ #125: (source: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj2.htm#925.%20ART.%20125.%20SODOMY )

925. ART. 125. SODOMY

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

[SMR 368]

You are absolutely correct. Many do not realize that if this code were to be followed to the letter, there would be no man or woman left in our military.

According to the UCMJ #125: (source: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj2.htm#925.%20ART.%20125.%20SODOMY )

925. ART. 125. SODOMY

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

By this definition, consensuality does not preclude sodomy. Seems odd.

[Ban Hammer 12,836]

Chuck's new neighbor.

the db is on the back of ft leavenworth - and miles from where i live.

[^_^ 5,021]

the db is on the back of ft leavenworth - and miles from where i live.

What's the db?

[Ban Hammer 12,836]

What's the db?

usdb.

united states disciplinary barracks

or the DB for short.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

so then heterosexual rape is caused by heterosexual marriage? Or is it caused by allowing heterosexual people in the military? Which?

This is like saying "See, legalize banks and before long one of them gets robbed!"

Is it sodomy when you have your own head up your own @ss?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

By this definition, consensuality does not preclude sodomy. Seems odd.

Really? It is the LAW in several "red states" not to mention making the ownership of sex toys a felony. Go ahead, let these sickos tell you what you can do in your bedroom, that is what happens.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Is it sodomy when you have your own head up your own @ss?

That would fit the criteria.

"Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense."

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

That would fit the criteria.

"Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense."

And it would be a slight penetration.

[james&olya 1,121]

Is it sodomy when you have your own head up your own @ss?

Cranio-ectopial endo-proctosis!

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Cranio-ectopial endo-proctosis!

I prefer "butt seks".

aka "spermatozoidal enema-osis"

However it is NOT good birth control as it is a known fact that is how lawyers are conceived!

[Ban Hammer 12,836]

I prefer "butt seks".

[james&olya 1,121]

I prefer "butt seks".

However it is NOT good birth control as it is a known fact that is how lawyers are conceived!

I prefer other forms personally! And as I feel we have magnitudes more lawyers than are necessary already I find that additional reason to abstain from that 'pleasure'!