Jump to content
Bad_Daddy

Obama administration won’t deport Venezuelan man who is married to an American man

 Share

39 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

A HUGE positive to this is healthcare. After Obama is out and we get rid of all that Obamacare nonsense, doctors can start thriving again. I could actually see doctors setting up office all over the country in all those vacant stripmalls. Doctors can get back to the old days and the way it is done in South America, Mexico etc... charge an illegal or USC without insurance $40 or $50 for an office visit and give the health insurance companies the finger. As it is now, an illegal goes to a hospital with a headache, sits in a waiting room for 10 hours, is required to have a zillion tests run, and then is prescribed some super duper tylenol. Then the govt-run hospital bills the govt $2k. Complete waste of time, funds, and tax-payer $$$. I can already see the positives coming.

well effective, what yesterday or the day before, of course he will not be deported. You guys read the memo, right? No more deportations unless the illegal is a threat to public safety (or something to that effect). I.e. a criminal (crime other than being here illegally)who is a threat. I.e. A shoplifter etc aint going to get deported anymore. They're only going to deport the hardcore criminals. Further, those characterized as "nonthreats" are encouraged to get work permits.

So... of course this guy isn't going to get deported (unless he is a threat).

I think it's a step in the right direction (in essense it's an amnesty... other than being able to vote, receive SS, etc). We've argued the topic to death like a broken record.

The one thing I think we could probably all agree on is that if Ron Paul wins (which I hope), and ends all welfare programs not only will all the freeloading USC not be able to freeload any longer, but also the illegals that don't have jobs or that were here to perhaps milk the system will go back as well. Further, it will most likely stop the flow of new illegals (at least the poorer ones). It means we won't be supporting illegals, nor poor USC.

That's better than nothing for the anti-illegal crowd.

Service Center : Vermont Service Center

Consulate : Bogota, Colombia

I-129F Sent : 2011-04-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Not only this is irrelevant to the topic, but also very weird. You do know that Obamacare appeared looong after the problems with healthcare developed and that very little of Obamacare is in force by now? May be you live on another planet :)

The issue with this guy is that he is gay and that is why he would be facing deportation. Was one of the couple a female or if the federal law was changed to recognize gay marriages, he'd be home safe. He did not enter illegally and he is married to a USC. The only thing standing between him and a GC is that fact that he's gay. So he should get to stay, otherwise this is a case of discrimination based on sexual orientation, which is already banned pretty much everywhere in the US.

Illegals should be deported, although I'd like to see a more humane system than ICE detention when it comes to non-criminals.

A HUGE positive to this is healthcare. After Obama is out and we get rid of all that Obamacare nonsense, doctors can start thriving again. I could actually see doctors setting up office all over the country in all those vacant stripmalls.

CR-1 Timeline

March'07 NOA1 date, case transferred to CSC

June'07 NOA2 per USCIS website!

Waiver I-751 timeline

July'09 Check cashed.

Jan'10 10 year GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Not only this is irrelevant to the topic, but also very weird. You do know that Obamacare appeared looong after the problems with healthcare developed and that very little of Obamacare is in force by now? May be you live on another planet :)

The issue with this guy is that he is gay and that is why he would be facing deportation. Was one of the couple a female or if the federal law was changed to recognize gay marriages, he'd be home safe. He did not enter illegally and he is married to a USC. The only thing standing between him and a GC is that fact that he's gay. So he should get to stay, otherwise this is a case of discrimination based on sexual orientation, which is already banned pretty much everywhere in the US.

How do you conclude that?

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Conclude what? That discrimination based on sexual orientation is illegal in the US in most places/situations?

How do you conclude that?

CR-1 Timeline

March'07 NOA1 date, case transferred to CSC

June'07 NOA2 per USCIS website!

Waiver I-751 timeline

July'09 Check cashed.

Jan'10 10 year GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

...The only thing standing between him and a GC is that fact that he's gay. So he should get to stay, otherwise this is a case of discrimination based on sexual orientation, which is already banned pretty much everywhere in the US.

No, the only thing standing between this man and a green card is his lack of a valid basis for adjustment of status. If you can't adjust status, you go home. That's how the system works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

No, the only thing standing between this man and a green card is his lack of a valid basis for adjustment of status. If you can't adjust status, you go home. That's how the system works.

Unless you want to try and fight to change the system so that homosexual marriages are Federally recognized. Thats why I don't think he married to avoid deportation, I think he would have married a woman instead.

Edited by Sousuke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Same thing. :yes:

No, the only thing standing between this man and a green card is his lack of a valid basis for adjustment of status.

...

CR-1 Timeline

March'07 NOA1 date, case transferred to CSC

June'07 NOA2 per USCIS website!

Waiver I-751 timeline

July'09 Check cashed.

Jan'10 10 year GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Which is probably what the couple in this case did. I do not care that they are gay, but they did violate the law. If they allow anyone to come and get married to avoid deportation, that would be a bad precedent.

I believe in equal rights. If a heterosexual spouse would be deported so should a gay spouse. If the rule is going to change to "if you marry an American you can stay" then just say so and let everyone do it.

A person can enter the US lawfully on a number of different non-immigrant visas, then marry a US citizen and move on to adjust status. All that as long as there was no "intent to immigrate" at the time of entry as a non-immigrant. Provided that no immigrant intent existed at the time of entry and the couple meets all other requirements for the foreign spouse to immigrate, that adjustment of status will work ou just fine. That precedent exists and has existed for quite some time.

The only issue for this particular couple is that while legally married in the US, their marriage is not recognized by the feds. This couple doesn't have equal rights. Yet. All else being equal, a foreign spouse in a hetero marriage would not be subject to deportation but would be able to adjust status. I take it that you then support this foreign spouse not being subject to deportation either?

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
If you had not done what you did, Kip, your wife could be going through this instead of having a green card and path to citizenship. I am glad I did it the right way.

Unless Kip's wife is male, she could very well have entered the US on a non-immigrant visa other than the K-1 or K-3 and, provided that she did not intent to immigrate at the time of entry, could have successfully filed for adjustment of status upon marrying her USC spouse while here. That is a legal path that many have pursued.

Thats why I don't think he married to avoid deportation, I think he would have married a woman instead.

Bingo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...