Jump to content

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted

Good Day Friends in the Immigration Community!

Heres the story!

Husband entered using b2 visa in 2003 (hasnt left since)

Overstayed 7 years

Decided to get married on July 16 2009 (I am a US citizen)

Had initial interview on October 14 where the IO said hes considering investigating i485 AOS for "accrued unlawful presence" and I may have to file I160!

Our i130 approved on Oct 14.

From what Ive read and discussed with others, if you marry a US citizen, then the overstayed Visa is generally "overlooked" "forgiven" "waived". In which case why is my IO giving us a heart attack?

Were supposed to receive a letter for a second interview for his AOS and RFE. Any advice on how to proceed? :huh:

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted

You nailed it.

The overstay is not being made an "issue of" which is pretty much what you said. However, that doesn't mean that the I.O. is not allowed to give you a hard time about it. That said, unless your husband pulled any other stunts (worked with a US citizen's SSN, etc.), I don't really see that they can't deny your request to adjust status.

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all . . . . The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic . . . . There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.

President Teddy Roosevelt on Columbus Day 1915

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted

Good Day Friends in the Immigration Community!

Heres the story!

Husband entered using b2 visa in 2003 (hasnt left since)

Overstayed 7 years

Decided to get married on July 16 2009 (I am a US citizen)

Had initial interview on October 14 where the IO said hes considering investigating i485 AOS for "accrued unlawful presence" and I may have to file I160!

Our i130 approved on Oct 14.

From what Ive read and discussed with others, if you marry a US citizen, then the overstayed Visa is generally "overlooked" "forgiven" "waived". In which case why is my IO giving us a heart attack?

Were supposed to receive a letter for a second interview for his AOS and RFE. Any advice on how to proceed? :huh:

It's an I-601 - not I-160. :blush:

I don't know what your IO has in mind. His overstay is not a relevant factor in adjudicating his AOS because he's an immediate relative of a US citizen. Maybe they're trying to scare you. Maybe they think he left and returned, which should have triggered a 10 year ban. Maybe they think he left, triggered the ban, and then returned illegally. Maybe they just want to crawl up his tailpipe with a microscope and see if there's any reason they can conjure up to deny him. Some IO's seem to take it personally when they're confronted with a long overstay and they're expected to just ignore it. You may not find out for sure what's up unless they deny the AOS.

Why are you expecting a letter for an RFE?

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Thanks for responding! I appreciate your feedback! The RFE is for an official statement from the courthouse about his criminal record. He had a DUI in 2003, (he was 23) which I know can also affect our case. Our lawyer did seem to think it was an issue, and the IO didnt make any comments about it, but who knows with these IO's.

Edited by jacmcj
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...