Jump to content

107 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I was just reading several threads (which shall remain nameless) where fraud was clear from the get go. And in several of these threads, it seems that the USC has either commented on his/her physical features/situation 'I'm heavy set, middle aged' etc. Or there's pictures where the beneficiary was clearly wayyy hotter than the OP.

I really don't want this to be a flame war, but it's no secret that the prospect of a GC is an equalizer in many relationships where people get married to others whom they clearly don't even know inside and out. I am NOT referring to everyone here, just on the extreme cases. I posted this in OT because I don't want to kick anyone while they're down by posting it in the Effects forum. I have always had a theory that some of the older modest looking men on here would find life long bliss with the older modest looking women here. Yet it seems neither want each other, and both gravitate towards younger, hotter, foreign born SOs. Each claims to want 'family values/etc' yet, I find they each put looks ahead of that in terms of significance. The men put looks above substance, claiming American women are all golddiggers, yet accomplished American women will petition men with no money and hand them whatever they want. When it all blows up in flames, each claims the partner was 'Americanized' or something similar.

Anyone else find that strange? Why are looks so damned important when choosing a spouse???

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I was just reading several threads (which shall remain nameless) where fraud was clear from the get go. And in several of these threads, it seems that the USC has either commented on his/her physical features/situation 'I'm heavy set, middle aged' etc. Or there's pictures where the beneficiary was clearly wayyy hotter than the OP.

I really don't want this to be a flame war, but it's no secret that the prospect of a GC is an equalizer in many relationships where people get married to others whom they clearly don't even know inside and out. I am NOT referring to everyone here, just on the extreme cases. I posted this in OT because I don't want to kick anyone while they're down by posting it in the Effects forum. I have always had a theory that some of the older modest looking men on here would find life long bliss with the older modest looking women here. Yet it seems neither want each other, and both gravitate towards younger, hotter, foreign born SOs. Each claims to want 'family values/etc' yet, I find they each put looks ahead of that in terms of significance. The men put looks above substance, claiming American women are all golddiggers, yet accomplished American women will petition men with no money and hand them whatever they want. When it all blows up in flames, each claims the partner was 'Americanized' or something similar.

Anyone else find that strange? Why are looks so damned important when choosing a spouse???

A pretty face (and a young body) makes men happy. It's hormonal.

That doesn't mean an older woman can't satisfy a man in her own way. It just won't be the same rush that a young face and perky tits produces. It's different.

Monogamy is unnatural.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

A pretty face (and a young body) makes men happy. It's hormonal.

That doesn't mean an older woman can't satisfy a man in her own way. It just won't be the same rush that a young face and perky tits produces. It's different.

Monogamy is unnatural.

Looks fade, though. Substance doesn't.

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Looks fade, though. Substance doesn't.

Sure, but a greencard still buys you a couple of good years. Maybe 4-5 years, if you play your cards right.

Then you can go and get a new Ruskie. Lather, rinse, repeat.

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I was just reading several threads (which shall remain nameless) where fraud was clear from the get go. And in several of these threads, it seems that the USC has either commented on his/her physical features/situation 'I'm heavy set, middle aged' etc. Or there's pictures where the beneficiary was clearly wayyy hotter than the OP.

I really don't want this to be a flame war, but it's no secret that the prospect of a GC is an equalizer in many relationships where people get married to others whom they clearly don't even know inside and out. I am NOT referring to everyone here, just on the extreme cases. I posted this in OT because I don't want to kick anyone while they're down by posting it in the Effects forum. I have always had a theory that some of the older modest looking men on here would find life long bliss with the older modest looking women here. Yet it seems neither want each other, and both gravitate towards younger, hotter, foreign born SOs. Each claims to want 'family values/etc' yet, I find they each put looks ahead of that in terms of significance. The men put looks above substance, claiming American women are all golddiggers, yet accomplished American women will petition men with no money and hand them whatever they want. When it all blows up in flames, each claims the partner was 'Americanized' or something similar.

Anyone else find that strange? Why are looks so damned important when choosing a spouse???

Physical attraction is just as important as mental attraction.

Your failed marriages come when you only look for one and you don't end up with both.

The initial attraction gets you in, but it's the mental attaction that makes you stay or go.

Same thing can be said for when people are friends and the mental attraction is there, but the physical is not. You can only handle talking to someone so much without the physical part before the relationship goes sour...

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Sure, but a greencard still buys you a couple of good years. Maybe 4-5 years, if you play your cards right.

Then you can go and get a new Ruskie. Lather, rinse, repeat.

If someone can be so superficial to dismiss someone based on looks, especially when that person him/herself is no supermodel, then I just wonder what kind of mirror they are looking in.

Like, if you're heavy, but you wouldn't date another heavy person. I find that odd.

Posted

Monogamy is unnatural.

A good 3 to 4 years ago I predicted on here that this would be the next liberal bandwagon issue. Thanks for proving me right. :thumbs:

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Posted

I was just reading several threads (which shall remain nameless) where fraud was clear from the get go. And in several of these threads, it seems that the USC has either commented on his/her physical features/situation 'I'm heavy set, middle aged' etc. Or there's pictures where the beneficiary was clearly wayyy hotter than the OP.

I really don't want this to be a flame war, but it's no secret that the prospect of a GC is an equalizer in many relationships where people get married to others whom they clearly don't even know inside and out. I am NOT referring to everyone here, just on the extreme cases. I posted this in OT because I don't want to kick anyone while they're down by posting it in the Effects forum. I have always had a theory that some of the older modest looking men on here would find life long bliss with the older modest looking women here. Yet it seems neither want each other, and both gravitate towards younger, hotter, foreign born SOs. Each claims to want 'family values/etc' yet, I find they each put looks ahead of that in terms of significance. The men put looks above substance, claiming American women are all golddiggers, yet accomplished American women will petition men with no money and hand them whatever they want. When it all blows up in flames, each claims the partner was 'Americanized' or something similar.

Anyone else find that strange? Why are looks so damned important when choosing a spouse???

I totally see what you mean, but this isn`t new , it`s been happening since forever and is not always related to a GC, in every country in this world there are some rich old people, mostly men, with 20 yr old women.I know, it is indeed hard to understand for some of us but it seems to make a lot of sense to others.Just human nature , maybe "survival instinct" haha :))

mGDboiw.jpgmGDbm4.png

zzflag019.gif united-states-flag.gif

03/31/2010 filed I129

12/16/2010 Interwiew-Approved

02/07/2011 POE-Chicago

03/16/2011 Wedding!!!

05/23/2011 AOS,EAD,AP apps sent

07/15/2011 EAD, AP approved

10/05/2011 AOS approved

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

If someone can be so superficial to dismiss someone based on looks, especially when that person him/herself is no supermodel, then I just wonder what kind of mirror they are looking in.

Like, if you're heavy, but you wouldn't date another heavy person. I find that odd.

It still doesn't change what you're attracted to. It's the same thing how some skinny guys are attracted to large women or how some skinny women are attracted to larger guys even.

We all have that body type that makes us smile/pay attention..

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Physical attraction is just as important as mental attraction.

Your failed marriages come when you only look for one and you don't end up with both.

The initial attraction gets you in, but it's the mental attaction that makes you stay or go.

Same thing can be said for when people are friends and the mental attraction is there, but the physical is not. You can only handle talking to someone so much without the physical part before the relationship goes sour...

I agree with you actually. I just find there's no 'balance' in finding both in some of these relationships. I think in normal circs, like attracts like. You're hot, your spouse is hot. You're not, your spouse usually isn't either. Unless there's an 'equalizer'. But what does that say about a relationship IF there needs to be an equalizer?

Filed: Other Country: India
Timeline
Posted

Physical attraction doesn't mean both people are really good looking. It means you are just attracted to that person for whatever reasons there are. Superficial reasons alone are not good enough IMO. I also wonder why men who aren't hot and women who aren't hot would make such a fuss over wanting a hot person to be with. Welcome to reality, most people are not hot.

Married since 9-18-04(All K1 visa & GC details in timeline.)

Ishu tum he mere Prabhu:::Jesus you are my Lord

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I totally see what you mean, but this isn`t new , it`s been happening since forever and is not always related to a GC, in every country in this world there are some rich old people, mostly men, with 20 yr old women.I know, it is indeed hard to understand for some of us but it seems to make a lot of sense to others.Just human nature , maybe "survival instinct" haha :))

You're right, it's not solely GC related.

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Sure, but a greencard still buys you a couple of good years. Maybe 4-5 years, if you play your cards right.

Then you can go and get a new Ruskie. Lather, rinse, repeat.

There are a few men on VJ who talk about their SO's or women from their SO's region as if they are so much meat. Creeps me out.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...