Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Danno

Father forces 8&9 yrold daughters to watch porn.

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Yeah I know for some people it's a crazy question but... we as a society may be on that rung of the ladder now.

Is it wrong to expose kids to porn?

I knew of a father who watched porn with his 15-16 yr old Daughter. Seemed shocking to me at the time but maybe they were just ahead of their time.

The mother had no objections.

-------------------------------

Web-posted Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Complaints filed in pornography case

By Joe Gamm

joe.gamm@amarillo.com

Two complaints have been filed against the Amarillo man accused of forcing his 8- and 9-year-old daughters to watch hard-core pornography.

Randall County District Attorney James Farren said Monday that his office filed two complaints against the Amarillo man after he allegedly showed the girls pornography.

Police reported the incident to Farren's office in June last year after one of the daughters told a counselor that her father made them watch adults have group sex and performed other acts online in his home, Farren said.

But the public indecency law prevents the prosecution of parents who show their children pornography.

The law was apparently meant to protect the privacy of parents who wanted to teach their children about sex, and states that parents can't be prosecuted for showing "harmful material" to their children.

Farren said according to the Texas penal code "harmful material" such as pornography is considered defensible from prosecution if it is shown to a minor who was accompanied by a consenting parent.

The girls' parents are divorced and share custody. The girls' mother wants her ex-husband to be jailed.

Farren said his office is banking on the child endangerment statute, which says it is an offense to recklessly place a child in imminent danger of mental impairment.

A conviction on the felony would mean the father would face up to two years in jail and a $10,000 fine on each charge.

"There is no built-in defense in this statute that a consenting parent allowed the children to view the material," Farren said.

After deciding not to pursue public indecency charges against the father, Farren had asked the Texas attorney general's office to look at what outcomes he might expect if he pursued a criminal complaint against the father for showing pornography to his children.

He said he wasn't surprised last week, when the response came back that there was a defense that would keep him from winning the case.

So, he began to consider using the child endangerment statute.

http://www.amarillo.com/stories/040610/new_news11.shtml

Edited by Danno

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

No "we as a society" are not on that "rung of the ladder". What the guy in this story supposedly did has zero reflection on anyone else. Let's try to not misrepresent these things.

Pull your head out and read the story.

Then explain why this is no longer a crime.

:whistle:


type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

Pull your head out and read the story.

Then explain why this is no longer a crime.

:whistle:

I read the story. The sky is not falling Danno.

It's probably no longer illegal because it isn't enforceable, not because it's suddenly become fashionable to show your kids pornographic videos at home.

Pull your head out and think things through before you post them in public and make yourself look dumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline
Police reported the incident to Farren's office in June last year after one of the daughters told a counselor that her father made them watch adults have group sex and performed other acts online in his home, Farren said.

If that isn't a crime, it should be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6pphVs8bF0


Don't just open your mouth and prove yourself a fool....put it in writing.

It gets harder the more you know. Because the more you find out, the uglier everything seems.

kodasmall3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

I read the story. The sky is not falling Danno.

It's probably no longer illegal because it isn't enforceable, not because it's suddenly become fashionable to show your kids pornographic videos at home.

Pull your head out and think things through before you post them in public and make yourself look dumb.

:whistle:

Speaking of looking dumb, did you really just suggest, showing a child porn was somehow too difficult a crime to enforce... and thats why it should be -no biggie?

I never suggested the "sky was falling" but I do believe the moral standards clearly have.


type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

:whistle:

Speaking of looking dumb, did you really just suggest, showing a child porn was somehow too difficult a crime to enforce... and thats why it should be -no biggie?

I never suggested the "sky was falling" but I do believe the moral standards clearly have.

OK genius, how would you determine that a "crime" has taken place?

No, you didn't state that the sky is falling but it's clearly implied. Moral standards have fallen because you have unearthed a rather obscure and unusual news story? Yeah right, that's a convincing argument. What a load of smelly old #######.

:lol: On your bike, Danno.

Edited by Its a MADHOUSE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

OK genius, how would you determine that a "crime" has taken place?

You do realize it's still a crime if say an Uncle or neighbor shows the kid Porn?

I can't imagine the method of determining if a crime had taken place would be all that much different but I'll let you explain.


type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me old fashioned, uptight, behind the times, a victim of my society; say "bad" and "wrong" are relative words...whatever. Exposing children to hardcore porn is disturbing. Actually, it's sickening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

You do realize it's still a crime if say an Uncle or neighbor shows the kid Porn?

I can't imagine the method of determining if a crime had taken place would be all that much different but I'll let you explain.

Danno, you do realize that there are crimes which, while illegal, are rarely prosecuted - because the burden of proof required makes it extremely difficult.

This is often the case when it comes down to one person's word against another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

It isn't illegal because some parents choose to show their 16 year olds a porn movie to instruct them on the mechanics of intercourse when they are unable to do it themselves properly. I don't see any problem with that. It is something that should be age appropriate, and 8 or 9 is certainly not appropriate. Is it morally reprehensible? Yes. Illegal? Technically no. But this isn't a harbinger of doom Danno. The sky isn't falling, and this isn't going to lead to more gay people. I know that is your ultimate fear when you insinuate a decay in morals. More gays is the herald of decadence and the deterioration of society as danno knows it. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

Sorry, but if the dad wants to show his kids porn, then so be it.... Would I do it? Hell ###### no. I'm not going to tell someone else not to though....

The prosecuter in this case shouldn't be wasting tax payer dollars on ####### like this...


nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

It isn't illegal because some parents choose to show their 16 year olds a porn movie to instruct them on the mechanics of intercourse when they are unable to do it themselves properly. I don't see any problem with that. It is something that should be age appropriate, and 8 or 9 is certainly not appropriate. Is it morally reprehensible? Yes. Illegal? Technically no. But this isn't a harbinger of doom Danno. The sky isn't falling, and this isn't going to lead to more gay people. I know that is your ultimate fear when you insinuate a decay in morals. More gays is the herald of decadence and the deterioration of society as danno knows it. :rolleyes:

SOme would find your persistent injection of Homosexuality into unrelated conversations is a symptom of your latent homophobic condition.

Yes we all know you claim to be a supporter of Gays but one has to wonder if this isn't just -I have Black friends- speak.

PLease, the topic is about exposing 8-9 year olds to porn.... not your mind reading speculations about Homosexuals.


type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No "we as a society" are not on that "rung of the ladder". What the guy in this story supposedly did has zero reflection on anyone else. Let's try to not misrepresent these things.

Yea, Danno, one misguided dad does not represent a society. Why be so dramatic? Maybe one day you will have a lapse of judgment, and then we can point to your error as being representative of society. Dude! :whistle:


Sign-on-a-church-af.jpgLogic-af.jpgwwiao.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...