Jump to content

Rudeness  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. How rude do you think is the following email?

    • Extremely Rude
    • Moderately Rude
    • Not Rude but not polite either
    • Definitely Could have been worded better


42 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone,

I have an interesting read for you all. An email to my to be father in law. Can you guys read it through just for the heck of it and answer the poll above.

"

Ok so basically I was informed yesterday that my entire email was taken out of context and all of you misunderstood what I said.

According to what I was told, here are the misunderstandings that you have

MISCONCEPTION #1: I will come just for a day

Clarification: Totally Not True. See below relevant information from my first email

"I had a conversation with my manager today and he said its hard to guarantee anything except Wednesday(08/04), Thursday(08/05), Friday (08/06), Saturday (08/07) and Sunday (08/08). "

If you count the number of days above, I am coming up with a count of 5 not 1.

"He said the safest thing to do for me would be to fly out on either Tuesday evening or Wednesday morning and arrive in UK earliest by Tuesday night or latest by Wednesday evening. This way I can have at least 5 days guaranteed at the very minimum"

The expectation from a young employee in US is very different from what you all might be used to in the UK; hence, the utter confusion. Even experienced employees do not get more then 2 weeks off.

I have limited availability and as a responsible employee I cannot spend months in UK after the wedding.

Please do not take the last statement out of context, this in no way undermines the importance of this event in my life otherwise I would not be burning favors with my managers.

MISCONCEPTION #2: I want the ceremony to be held on Friday

Clarification: Totally Not True. I said previously in my last email "I apologize sincerely but it seems like the safest thing to do is have the event scheduled on Friday."

That does not mean I am against holding the event on Saturday. If Friday pose such great problems for you, schedule it on Saturday.

If you do it on Saturday, you will definitely be looking after the interests of your guests but not mine. If and i mean only if(that does not imply in any way that I will definitely have to work on Monday) I am scheduled to work on Monday, I will be leaving by Sunday afternoon, hence putting me in a very tight schedule.

But in any case, I am open to having it on Saturday, I guess according to you guys it seems like the commute from downtown London to Luton is more of pain then a commute from London to US. Hence, your guest schedule takes preference over my schedule.

Next time if you have a misunderstanding, I HIGHLY SUGGEST contacting me first through phone or email before going haywire.

"

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

If I were them, I would probably take it as rude, but you're just enforcing a point you were trying to make that they weren't getting.

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Posted

Definitely rude.

This 'it is not the UK tone', is not going to go down well.

That needs to be reworded as it's coming off as I am a spoiled yank, used to getting my way.

"I believe in the power of the free market, but a free market was never meant to

be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it." President Obama

Posted

Yep, phone call is the way to go. Remember, this is your spouse's father.

Not sure how some folks are raised to treat other here but you wouldn't want that tone with your father in law.

"I believe in the power of the free market, but a free market was never meant to

be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it." President Obama

Posted

Eek.

It's very condescending. It's clear that you're frustrated with the misunderstanding, but the tone is highly confrontational and is only going to upset people further.

If you must send an e-mail, I suggest using simpler, more polite wording. An example:

Instead of:

"Next time if you have a misunderstanding, I HIGHLY SUGGEST contacting me first through phone or email before going haywire."

How about something like:

"It seems that there has been some confusion. It may be best if we talk on the phone."

I think it would be better to call, to be honest. First, it's more personal, and you can clearly explain what's happening. Also, you may not want evidence of your anger and frustration sitting in various e-mail inboxes. This is the kind of e-mail that gets forwarded to all and sundry ("Can you believe this?")--unless your father-in-law is particularly discreet.

Good luck!

K-1

March 7, 2005: I-129F NOA1

September 20, 2005: K-1 Interview in London. Visa received shortly thereafter.

AOS

December 30, 2005: I-485 received by USCIS

May 5, 2006: Interview at Phoenix district office. Approval pending FBI background check clearance. AOS finally approved almost two years later: February 14, 2008.

Received 10-year green card February 28, 2008

Your Humble Advice Columnist, Joyce

Come check out the most happenin' thread on VJ: Dear Joyce

Click here to see me visiting with my homebodies.

[The grooviest signature you've ever seen is under construction!]

Posted

Eek.

It's very condescending. It's clear that you're frustrated with the misunderstanding, but the tone is highly confrontational and is only going to upset people further.

If you must send an e-mail, I suggest using simpler, more polite wording. An example:

Instead of:

"Next time if you have a misunderstanding, I HIGHLY SUGGEST contacting me first through phone or email before going haywire."

How about something like:

"It seems that there has been some confusion. It may be best if we talk on the phone."

I think it would be better to call, to be honest. First, it's more personal, and you can clearly explain what's happening. Also, you may not want evidence of your anger and frustration sitting in various e-mail inboxes. This is the kind of e-mail that gets forwarded to all and sundry ("Can you believe this?")--unless your father-in-law is particularly discreet.

Good luck!

Miss Groovy is right thinking :thumbs:

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Posted (edited)

Oh my! Were you attempting to *not* be rude?

:) I apologize, I should have provided a little more background on myself. Lets just say I was employed in a profession previously where the code of conduct was extremely formal. My family also has criticized the lack of "personal touch" in my letters/email/communication time again and again.

Sometimes what I write seems much more "in your face stuff" when I certainly have the opposite intentions. I have understood the need and importance of how essential it can be to add that personal touch; I guess this has been my biggest weakness but I will work more diligently to improve my communication skills.

Thank you so much for all your feedback! I truly appreciate it! :_

Edited by evilmonkey
Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

'Professional/Formal' is a complete copout, this email is rude, condescending and actually quite aggressive. As well as snide* If you spoke that way in a business setting, you'd alienate your clients.

* 'I guess according to you guys it seems like the commute from downtown London to Luton is more of pain then a commute from London to US. Hence, your guest schedule takes preference over my schedule.' <-----omG!

I realize my response is quite curt, but I'm kinda gobsmacked that you actually were unsure of whether or not this was rude.

Edited by Happy Bunny
Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Posted

Hahha. This made me crack up.

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...