Major Blow to Homophobes: SCOTUS Refuses to Block Gay Marriage in DC

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Wow, you guys really pissed her off.

I'm not pissed off. The game just makes better sense than a lot of folks here do.

You don't have to marry a man. You don't even have to accept it. Who cares if you accept it? You don't even have to think about it. I don't accept grown men playing with toy trains...and what? Mind your own fuggin' business!!!!!

It is my business. I'm not in denial where I live in a vaccum, like you.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I just caught a glimpse of an old Seinfeld episode where George Costanza goes to a male masseuse. I'll have to see if I can find it on Youtube...it's hilarious.

Indeed...

K4_JXJ33mLI

I see Steven beat me to it.

Edited March 3, 2010 by Mr. Big Dog

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Which is kind of ironic, as in the sims 3, you have the choice to have your Sims pick same sex partners

No same sex partners in my games.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

The game just makes better sense than a lot of folks here do.

You don't have to actually substantiate any arguments you make either when playing a game.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Nobody is saying that the mere fact of belonging to a minority affords anyone any rights. That's not the point anyone is making.

Sure, it is. You feel sorry for this particular minority, so you choose to ignore the impact on a society that gives them the "right" to marry against the will of the majority.

It's tough business to be on the losing side of history.

No history yet. I'm hardly a loser. No court can make society accept what they decide. Gay marriage will continue to be unacceptable to many individuals and institutions. Those who believe that laws can change minds are the losers.

You don't have to actually substantiate any arguments you make either when playing a game.

No, it's much like the reality you guys create for yourself when you ignore the fact that there are more than a few who disagree with your liberalism.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

I'm not pissed off. The game just makes better sense than a lot of folks here do.

It is my business. I'm not in denial where I live in a vaccum, like you.

It is absolutely, totally, completely, and forever and always NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS...

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Sounds like a vile game that God would hate. I am sure she is only playing it as part of her ongoing research into evil. Kind of the same reason I download porn.

God is part of my game.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

God is part of my game.

If you say so...

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I'm not pissed off. The game just makes better sense than a lot of folks here do.

It is my business. I'm not in denial where I live in a vaccum, like you.

How is what I do with MY wife in OUR bedroom...YOUR BUSINESS????? Because if it is your business what two lesbians do (or 6...don't get me started) then it must be your business what I do, what my wife does, what your neighbors do. I will BET you there are things I do with my wife that you do not approve of, and what? Who will monitor this? This is why conservatives are just as repulsive to me as liberals, they just want to control a different part of my life...stay the #### out of my life! Stay out of my bedroom, my garage, my doctor's office, my refrigerator. It is none of your business what I smoke, drink, eat, drive, shoot or ####!!!!!!! I do not need the government to tell me what to do in my bedroom! At least a liberal Democrat can make some hollow, bogus claim of being concerned about ME when they want to control my life in "exchnage" for healthcare. They can at least pretend at some redeeming value...but this control of what people do in their bedroom simply has no redeeming value and is nothing but sick control of people for no reason. I want to vomit. Why do we not have a vomit icon yet?

God is part of my game.

bet he doesn't like (or you don't like in his name) what I do with my wife in bed. Tough ####### for you. I respect your right to believe in leprechauns also.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Well, the Solicitor General is not a position equivalent to a groundskeeper. And again, Olson has a pretty solid record of successfully arguing high profile cases. And there's little argument that he's a red blood conservative. Now I don't know what else you're looking for. Read the case he's making - it's really worth reading.

It is worth reading and worth disagreeing with.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Sure, it is. You feel sorry for this particular minority, so you choose to ignore the impact on a society that gives them the "right" to marry against the will of the majority.

I don't feel sorry for them, I just believe that they have the same right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as heterosexuals. It is widely accepted - except in some little bubbles - that homosexuals haven't chosen to be homosexuals much like left-handed people haven chosen to be left handed.

No history yet. I'm hardly a loser. No court can make society accept what they decide. Gay marriage will continue to be unacceptable to many individuals and institutions. Those who believe that laws can change minds are the losers.

De-segregation and interracial marriages are widely accepted today, aren't they? Those were imposed by the Supreme Court against the will of the people in a number of states. And the history on same sex marriage is in the process of being written. It has been legalized in a number of states and will eventually be legalized in all of the states.And we're not talking decades from now but rather a few years. 40 years from now, people will look back at the beginning of the century and wonder what all the bigotry was all about.

No, it's much like the reality you guys create for yourself when you ignore the fact that there are more than a few who disagree with your liberalism.

It's not liberalism - it's the Constitution. That liberal rag, you know.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Sure, it is. You feel sorry for this particular minority, so you choose to ignore the impact on a society that gives them the "right" to marry against the will of the majority.

No history yet. I'm hardly a loser. No court can make society accept what they decide. Gay marriage will continue to be unacceptable to many individuals and institutions. Those who believe that laws can change minds are the losers.

No, it's much like the reality you guys create for yourself when you ignore the fact that there are more than a few who disagree with your liberalism.

I am not a liberal.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

It is worth reading and worth disagreeing with.

What argument does ted put forth that you disagree with and why do you disagree with it?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

It is absolutely, totally, completely, and forever and always NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS...

It is my business. I don't have my head in the sand.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Sure, it is. You feel sorry for this particular minority, so you choose to ignore the impact on a society that gives them the "right" to marry against the will of the majority.

No history yet. I'm hardly a loser. No court can make society accept what they decide. Gay marriage will continue to be unacceptable to many individuals and institutions. Those who believe that laws can change minds are the losers.

No, it's much like the reality you guys create for yourself when you ignore the fact that there are more than a few who disagree with your liberalism.

Gay marriage is not "liberalism" - sorry.

Gay marriage is a fallacy in itself just as much Hetero Marriage is a fallacy in itself when it comes to Government recognizing it.

If you are religious and want your church to marry you, that's great.

However, if you want Government to recognize the union then it needs to recognize it between parties of all sexes who wish to be recognized as a union. You cannot give benefit to those who you feel deserve so based on a moral chart. It doesn't work that way.

If you think it does, I would suggest you get a better understanding of the constitution.

Edited March 3, 2010 by Paul and Vanessa