EPA to Global Warming Deniers: GFY

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Mista fvckin nobody! Lil child of mine. To the lil boy in plaid!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Be sure to keep the tissue handy...

Edited December 8, 2009 by Galt's gallstones

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Be sure to keep the tissue handy...

Keep chasin me lil man! You will always be behind me. POOR GUY!

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Once again solar boy as been put to rest! Heres to ya lil solar BOY!

lil biotch starts a dance he cant finish!

[scandal 951]

Once again solar boy as been put to rest! Heres to ya lil solar BOY!

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Night lil BOY!

HEH HEH! We have BELIEFS! CYA!

AMEN!

Edited December 8, 2009 by ={Rogue}=

[scandal 951]

Night lil BOY!

Good night to you too, sweet sweet lil' Marc'ie poo :star:

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Once again solar boy as been put to rest! Heres to ya lil solar BOY!

Hes been tucked in just like the CHILD he IS!

La Grange or would it be outside your Range? Or maybe just plain #####! Take yo fvckin pick!

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

[NickD 203]

NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Well since we are carbon units, my source is that Star Trek series, it would not be in the best interest for the environment for the government to burn us on this issue.

Gather that CO2 levels at around 15,000 ppm can have very negative affects on humans, 7.5% or 75,000 ppm would be deadly. In crowded assemblies like a theater or a church with very poor air exchange rates due to the high cost of energy, notice adverse symptoms at 400 ppm, yawning is key symptom, but also may be caused by pure boredom. More research is needed in this area.

Actually, CO2 headaches start at around 5000ppm. 40,000ppm is imminently dangerous to human life.

Just grabbed the first site I found on Hypercapnia that seemed reasonable. Apparently there is a different consensus on this subject as well.

Ever notice it's not easy to stick with with an intellectual and informative discussion on these key subjects that affect all of us? Why do these threads end up with idiotic and personal attack remarks and comments? Don't these people have any pride in themselves in what they say? Or are these remnants of Reagan releasing the mentally incompetent from protective custody? I really do not know the reason, but find it highly annoying.

[Danno 1,228]

We do know this, getting the lowest EPA emission gasoline powered internal combustion engine vehicle, starting and running it in a close garage, you will be dead in ten minutes.

Now consider thousands of stalled vehicles, say on the Dan Ryan during rush hour, all idling on a hot windless day. So far really haven't heard of anyone dying from this, but certainly cannot be too great on your health. Especially if you do this everyday.

1. it would take a lot long that ten minutes to die.

2 I agree pollution in excess, can be harmful

3. co2 is not pollution

[HAL 9000 96]

NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Well since we are carbon units, my source is that Star Trek series, it would not be in the best interest for the environment for the government to burn us on this issue.

Gather that CO2 levels at around 15,000 ppm can have very negative affects on humans, 7.5% or 75,000 ppm would be deadly. In crowded assemblies like a theater or a church with very poor air exchange rates due to the high cost of energy, notice adverse symptoms at 400 ppm, yawning is key symptom, but also may be caused by pure boredom. More research is needed in this area.

Actually, CO2 headaches start at around 5000ppm. 40,000ppm is imminently dangerous to human life.

Just grabbed the first site I found on Hypercapnia that seemed reasonable. Apparently there is a different consensus on this subject as well.

Ever notice it's not easy to stick with with an intellectual and informative discussion on these key subjects that affect all of us? Why do these threads end up with idiotic and personal attack remarks and comments? Don't these people have any pride in themselves in what they say? Or are these remnants of Reagan releasing the mentally incompetent from protective custody? I really do not know the reason, but find it highly annoying.

Try the medical sites and the people that sign up to die for these sick scientists' guvamint-funded labs.

As for these 'people'- while I highly believe that this world will be a better place once they depart from polluting the gene pool with such stupidity... those that have enough gray matter to propel knowledge in a positive direction will arguably have a better stance to prevent those on the brink from slipping to join those zombies.

[NickD 203]

NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Well since we are carbon units, my source is that Star Trek series, it would not be in the best interest for the environment for the government to burn us on this issue.

Gather that CO2 levels at around 15,000 ppm can have very negative affects on humans, 7.5% or 75,000 ppm would be deadly. In crowded assemblies like a theater or a church with very poor air exchange rates due to the high cost of energy, notice adverse symptoms at 400 ppm, yawning is key symptom, but also may be caused by pure boredom. More research is needed in this area.

Actually, CO2 headaches start at around 5000ppm. 40,000ppm is imminently dangerous to human life.

Just grabbed the first site I found on Hypercapnia that seemed reasonable. Apparently there is a different consensus on this subject as well.

Ever notice it's not easy to stick with with an intellectual and informative discussion on these key subjects that affect all of us? Why do these threads end up with idiotic and personal attack remarks and comments? Don't these people have any pride in themselves in what they say? Or are these remnants of Reagan releasing the mentally incompetent from protective custody? I really do not know the reason, but find it highly annoying.

Try the medical sites and the people that sign up to die for these sick scientists' guvamint-funded labs.

As for these 'people'- while I highly believe that this world will be a better place once they depart from polluting the gene pool with such stupidity... those that have enough gray matter to propel knowledge in a positive direction will arguably have a better stance to prevent those on the brink from slipping to join those zombies.

Ongoing discussion about taking a psychological test before being able to purchase a firearm, perhaps the same should apply before going on the internet.

[HAL 9000 96]

NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Well since we are carbon units, my source is that Star Trek series, it would not be in the best interest for the environment for the government to burn us on this issue.

Gather that CO2 levels at around 15,000 ppm can have very negative affects on humans, 7.5% or 75,000 ppm would be deadly. In crowded assemblies like a theater or a church with very poor air exchange rates due to the high cost of energy, notice adverse symptoms at 400 ppm, yawning is key symptom, but also may be caused by pure boredom. More research is needed in this area.

Actually, CO2 headaches start at around 5000ppm. 40,000ppm is imminently dangerous to human life.

Just grabbed the first site I found on Hypercapnia that seemed reasonable. Apparently there is a different consensus on this subject as well.

Ever notice it's not easy to stick with with an intellectual and informative discussion on these key subjects that affect all of us? Why do these threads end up with idiotic and personal attack remarks and comments? Don't these people have any pride in themselves in what they say? Or are these remnants of Reagan releasing the mentally incompetent from protective custody? I really do not know the reason, but find it highly annoying.

Try the medical sites and the people that sign up to die for these sick scientists' guvamint-funded labs.

As for these 'people'- while I highly believe that this world will be a better place once they depart from polluting the gene pool with such stupidity... those that have enough gray matter to propel knowledge in a positive direction will arguably have a better stance to prevent those on the brink from slipping to join those zombies.

Ongoing discussion about taking a psychological test before being able to purchase a firearm, perhaps the same should apply before going on the internet.

As long as the evil guvamint keeps its hand off of their mental/health care...