Question about evidence...

[KimandRuss 0]

Just to reiterate...photos are secondary ..not primary ..evidence. Each Embassy is very different in their requests so it's important to know all you can about t he Embassy you will be dealing with and prepare as best you can.

As mentioned above, adding at least a little proof of on-going relationship is not requested as per the I-129f BUT it is recommended. Someone recently reported a RFE for proof of on-going evidence from USCIS.

[CuriousGuy 0]

It's become pretty clearn in my reading here that even IF the petitioner goes back to Manila to attend the interview, the CO's do not...will not...speak to the petioner. I understand WHY, as they are trying to determine the sincerity of the beneficiary, as well as what he/she may know as to the legitimacy of the relationship. BUT, will they at LEAST have another employee confirm the physcial presence of the petitioner there in the building?

IF they dont' care, and don't even LOOK to CONFIRM that the petitioner is THERE....then isn't such a trip purely a waste from that standpoint? {It's not a waste for the moral support and encouragement of your fiance', but} I mean for showing validity to the relationship?

[pushbrk 14,471]

It's become pretty clearn in my reading here that even IF the petitioner goes back to Manila to attend the interview, the CO's do not...will not...speak to the petioner. I understand WHY, as they are trying to determine the sincerity of the beneficiary, as well as what he/she may know as to the legitimacy of the relationship. BUT, will they at LEAST have another employee confirm the physcial presence of the petitioner there in the building?

IF they dont' care, and don't even LOOK to CONFIRM that the petitioner is THERE....then isn't such a trip purely a waste from that standpoint? {It's not a waste for the moral support and encouragement of your fiance', but} I mean for showing validity to the relationship?

If you are present nearby, simply give the beneficiary your passport to show the CO.