Jump to content
B&Y

What is the better for interview?

 Share

24 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
there is no requirement to prove your relationship is ongoing to the consular officer.
With deference to the excellent Brad, and certainly to all who have recent experience with the Kiev consulate, let me add the general caution that consular staff, policies, and requirements can change overnight and without warning. Accordingly, it is prudent to be overprepared, "just in case."

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is no requirement to prove your relationship is ongoing to the consular officer.
With deference to the excellent Brad, and certainly to all who have recent experience with the Kiev consulate, let me add the general caution that consular staff, policies, and requirements can change overnight and without warning. Accordingly, it is prudent to be overprepared, "just in case."

I agree - better safe than sorry. For Kiev though, just don't sweat the extra stuff too much. We had two binders (no kidding) of supporting evidence, and they didn't even look at it. Interview was over in 5 mintes. TBone, your point is a good one though. Do watch the news, and if trouble breaks out in the country that your SO lives in try to figure out if it will effect the process any. We worry a little about Ukraine electing a pro-Russian government, and a tightening of immigration requirements because of that.

3dflags_ukr0001-0001a.gif3dflags_usa0001-0001a.gif

Travelers - not tourists

Friday.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Do watch the news, and if trouble breaks out in the country that your SO lives in try to figure out if it will effect the process any. We worry a little about Ukraine electing a pro-Russian government, and a tightening of immigration requirements because of that.
Ah -- this is good thinking, too, and it hadn't occurred to me. I was referring to new leadership within the U.S. consulates themselves -- a result of Foreign Service officers' retiring, being transferred, etc. -- with the assignment of new people (for example, a new Section Chief in the Immigrant Visa Unit). A Section Chief who places a priority on anti-human-trafficking, for example, or who has served his entire previous career in high-fraud locations, can have quite a chilling impact on what was previously an "easy" visa-procuring experience. And, we mere mortals don't have a clue as to when the Dept. of State reassigns consular personnel, or why.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do watch the news, and if trouble breaks out in the country that your SO lives in try to figure out if it will effect the process any. We worry a little about Ukraine electing a pro-Russian government, and a tightening of immigration requirements because of that.
Ah -- this is good thinking, too, and it hadn't occurred to me. I was referring to new leadership within the U.S. consulates themselves -- a result of Foreign Service officers' retiring, being transferred, etc. -- with the assignment of new people (for example, a new Section Chief in the Immigrant Visa Unit). A Section Chief who places a priority on anti-human-trafficking, for example, or who has served his entire previous career in high-fraud locations, can have quite a chilling impact on what was previously an "easy" visa-procuring experience. And, we mere mortals don't have a clue as to when the Dept. of State reassigns consular personnel, or why.

Also interesting. The countries I have visited all have listings for embassy staff on the web, but I never even checked out personnel in Ukraine. Never thought about it.

3dflags_ukr0001-0001a.gif3dflags_usa0001-0001a.gif

Travelers - not tourists

Friday.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Also interesting. The countries I have visited all have listings for embassy staff on the web, but I never even checked out personnel in Ukraine. Never thought about it.
Such information can be tough to find, and outdated when one finds it. I learned that the Section Chief in charge of my consulate had spent the last 5+ years in Washington with the OAS (in anti-human-trafficking, no less), and I presume that he had been yanked from that comfortable locale for another consular assignment, due to personnel shortages throughout the Foreign Service. His professional orientation, and possibly grouchiness at having been transferred to what is not exactly a garden spot in a third-world country, play an undetermined role in the current policies of the infernal consulate there. Sadly, these insights came to me after the fact, when full-blown damage control was already necessary.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Lebanon
Timeline
Hello,

I just like to know what is the better for interview,

Have more trip to my fiancée between NOA1 and NOA2 or be at interview with my fiancée?

I like to do both but I think my boss not let me do this.

I made one trip after we got NOA1.

Thank you,

B&Y

I went for my then fiances interveiw - didnt actually get to go into the embassy for it, but i was in the country.... It was a great experience when he came out of the embassy holding his approval notice..

Oh yeah - if your fiance is told by anyone to not say anything about you being in the country - tell her dont do it. They asked my fiance where i was - the consulate was holding a piece of paper at the time which leads me to believe they ran my passport to see where i was before his interview and was trying to see if he was going to tell the truth or not. So tell the truth........

Good Luck

¨*:•.(¯`'•.¸ K-1¸.•'´¯) .•:*¨

~ 07/05/06 - Met Hayz online by accident

~ 03/30/08 - Packet sent to VSC

~ 04/22/08 - NOA1 issued - Yeah they took it this time

~ 05/22/08 - Touch

~ 07/25/08 - Touch (showed about 1pm on the USCIS site)

~ 07/25/08 - NOA2 sent (must have been later in the day - noticed it on 7/26)

~ 09/10/08 - INTERVIEW - VISA APPROVED ! ! ! !

~ 09/12/08 - VISA RECEIVED

~ 10/17/08 - Arrival in the USA (JFK POE)

~ 10/31/08 - MARRIED! ! !

¨*:•.(¯`'•.¸ AOS¸.•'´¯) .•:*¨

~ 03/26/09 - Sent AOS (I-485, I-765, I-131)

~ 03/27/09 - AOS packet signed for by V BUSTAMANTE

~ 04/02/09 - NOA for AOS/ EAD / Travel Doc

~ 04/03/09 - Check cashed

~ 04/25/09 - Biometrics

~ 04/20/09 - Transferred to CSC

~ 04/25/09 - Transfer notice received in the mail

~ 04/27/09 - Arrived at CSC

~ 05/09/09 - Employment Auth / Travel Document Approved

~ 05/12/09 - AP approved - without an interview

~ 05/23/09 - Welcome letter received

~ 06/05/09 - GREEN CARD RECEIVED! ! !

~ 09/11/11 - DIVORCE - DIVORCE - DIVORCE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also interesting. The countries I have visited all have listings for embassy staff on the web, but I never even checked out personnel in Ukraine. Never thought about it.
Such information can be tough to find, and outdated when one finds it. I learned that the Section Chief in charge of my consulate had spent the last 5+ years in Washington with the OAS (in anti-human-trafficking, no less), and I presume that he had been yanked from that comfortable locale for another consular assignment, due to personnel shortages throughout the Foreign Service. His professional orientation, and possibly grouchiness at having been transferred to what is not exactly a garden spot in a third-world country, play an undetermined role in the current policies of the infernal consulate there. Sadly, these insights came to me after the fact, when full-blown damage control was already necessary.

The only website I ever examined closely was for Belarus, because I interacted with consul, economic, and political officers sometimes. That post is apparently not a popular one, so maybe the names just didn't change that often. Those meetings were interesting, and gave a certain amount of insight into the thinking of members of the diplomatic corps.

3dflags_ukr0001-0001a.gif3dflags_usa0001-0001a.gif

Travelers - not tourists

Friday.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Thank you so much for all your thoughts. I knew it's better to be there for interview but I'm so missing her :crying: and I was looking for a reason to go and see her ASAP.

Edited by B&Y
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for all your thoughts. I knew it's better to be there for interview but I'm so missing her :crying: and I was looking for a reason to go and see her ASAP.

Have a heart-to-heart with your boss. Maybe it can be done :star:

3dflags_ukr0001-0001a.gif3dflags_usa0001-0001a.gif

Travelers - not tourists

Friday.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...