akdiver
-
Posts
2,458 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Posts posted by akdiver
-
-
You can wear anything you want. They can't deny you for not wearing fancy clothes. Jeans and a t-shirt is fine. It's all I am planning to wear.Ok don't laugh but I've gotten too fat to wear any of the nice blouses and skirts that I own to my oath ceremony which is this Thursday afternoon. I do have nice pants, shoes and sweaters however as far as the sweater issue goes it will be in the 60s where I live. Am I now going to be forced to go out and purchase a larger skirt and blouse to wear to this ceremony?
-
He does not live in India.
He lives in whatever state he lives in.
He should file for divorce in that state.
It sounds as if he has been abandoned by his "wife" and should so indicate in his petition for divorce. If I were here, I would go ahead and mention the attempted blackmail as well - as sort of a preemptive defense against whatever bullshit may come along.
Once his state grants his dirvoce, he is divorced as far as the U.S. is concerned. What India thinks really doesn't matter, unless he wants to get married in India again.
-
Thanks for the news flash.I've had it!I have been seperated from my love going on 2 years now and I refuse to wait any longer. At the end of this month(OCT.) my address will be Medellin Colombia! I will stay in Colombia until the immigration paperwork for my wife is finished! -
I hate them too, and I'm not even from Liverpool.
-
I recently sent in my passport to have pages added. The dumbasses screwed up and SHREDDED MY PASSPORT! MORONS!!!!!OMG! Now I'm afraid to send in my daughter's birth certificate and my husband's certificate of naturalization. I thought they only need photocopies.
-
Well, Einstein it's moot, not mute. But thanks for trying.your opinion about child support is mute. -
Had the residents kept loaded and ready-to-use firearms at the ready and shot at the intruders, we might have had a much better outcome.
I'm for certain kinds of socialism - like issuing handguns to all residents and providing the training in how to use them.
-
So...what...you think the photo should have a light-skinned guy?
-
I don't really get the idea of trying to convert the U.S. to socialism. If you want socialism, just move to Europe. They've been doing it a lot longer and are much better at it than we are, and it's part of the culture. Seems like just moving over there is the easier route if that's what you're looking for in a society.
-
You don't have to have more than 50% of the popular vote. You generally just need to have the most votes. However, the votes that matter are the ones in the electoral college - that's where the winning candidate must have a majority. If there is a need for a "run off" election, it happens in the electoral college, not with the popular vote. The popular vote really doesn't matter very much. It's possible to have won the popular vote, but not win enough votes in the electoral college, so that the "less popular" candidate can win. This has happened four times - most recently in the 2000 election.How exactly does it work up there, do people often get elected with less than 50% of the vote.With 5 or 6 candidates, seems like it would be mighty difficult to get a majority vote, or maybe they have a run-off?Read here:
http://www.america.gov/st/elections08-engl...o0.8026239.html
-
uh...okLove has nothing to do with it. If you can be so cold as to not want to get to know or love a human being created by you and another person that you chose to lay down with, well that's one thing. But not to live up to your responsibilities because of that lack of 'heart' is wrong...any way you try to spell it out for us.
It makes perfect sense. Why pay for something for which one is receiving no benefit? THAT makes no sense.According to you, because a custodial parent actually takes the responsibility of their actions and cares for this child (not an "it" btw) that they lay down to create, then they should be the only one financially responsible? That makes no sense.
No, but taking custody of what comes out of it does.Just because a woman has a uterus does not make her any more responsible for a child that was conceived by both of you.
And which child would that be??Anyway, rather than continuing to hijack this thread with more nonsense, I just want to wish you, and your beautiful child, the very best. -
Like what??From your responses to this posting, it almost sounds like you are trying to defend your own actions. Something you want to tell us? -
Um...what does one have to do with the other???Do you think that they might refuse him the visa if they check that I'm a foreign spouse?Anyway - the answer is "no".
-
The "modern decathalon" includes the following events:
- 100 meters
- Long Jump
- Shot Put
- High Jump
- 400 meters
- 110 meter hurdles
- Discus
- Pole Vault
- Javelin
- 1500 meters
- Poker (No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em)
- Billiards (straight pool)
- Darts
- Dominoes
- Bowling
- Monopoly
-
huh?
Why yes! And whom do you think the OP was referring to when he mentioned the 1976 election? Duh!!Jimmy Carter is a Democrat. He served as president from 1977-1981.Gee, I gave you the hint, sparky, and you took off running with it. Duh! You must be so proud!
Multiple parties in government is hardly unique to Canada (:We should try Canada's approach to multiple parties. They have 6 major parties, 4 of which have a major say-so. Imagine the working together of different ideas that might accomplish. People tend to start changing their vote when nothing gets done, so I'm sure they'd be more eager to do something at least. -
OK, so let's hear your review of the democrat policies (:Conservatives have done a good job at brainwashing people.I come to this conclusion because here in the U.S., their policies are as outlined:
Moral policies: Backfired in their face.
Fiscal policies: Backfired in their face.
Economic policies: Backfired in their face.
Foreign policies: Backfired in their face.
It's not an illusion. As long as sensible people continue to refuse to vote 3rd party, it's what we're stuck with.Simple. People are well into the illusion of a two party system
I agree. But to be fair, the democrats have the same strategy, they just use different issues.Republicans know they instantly get near 50% of the votes each time. Keep the issues divisive, making gay marriage and "terrorism" the focus, act religious, morally superior, and voila, you have an easy vote coming your way.As I know you are aware, the democrats are no better than the republicans. But if they manage to actually lose this election - then my god - they may as well disband the party.
-
Two dirt bags detailing how they will violate the constitution. Nothing new there.
-
Actually, I was still in the process of finalizing my post when you posted. I didn't see your post until afterward.What an appropriate response. I also like how you edited your response to clarify, since yeah--it was unclear.
What insults?But no worries--resulting to insults was a totally legitimate response. -
We're supposed to be done with the cloudy weather by the end of the week. That will be nice. Then it can get nice and cold.
-
Well, if one has their head in the ###, I can see how things might be clear as mud.
That's clear as mud.
It is more than crystal clear to anyone with an IQ greater than that of Bush, that the OP was indicating that one only democrat has been elected as president since the election of Carter in 1976.
That makes no sense. The OP said only one Democrat has been elected since 1976, and that was Bill Clinton. Since 1976, two Democrats have been elected: Jimmy Carter (in the year in question) and Clinton. If he was trying to exclude Carter, he should have said since 1980.
Why yes! And whom do you think the OP was referring to when he mentioned the 1976 election? Duh!!Jimmy Carter is a Democrat. He served as president from 1977-1981. -
It is more than crystal clear to anyone with an IQ greater than that of Bush, that the OP was indicating that one only democrat has been elected as president since the election of Carter in 1976.
That makes no sense. The OP said only one Democrat has been elected since 1976, and that was Bill Clinton. Since 1976, two Democrats have been elected: Jimmy Carter (in the year in question) and Clinton. If he was trying to exclude Carter, he should have said since 1980.
Why yes! And whom do you think the OP was referring to when he mentioned the 1976 election? Duh!!Jimmy Carter is a Democrat. He served as president from 1977-1981.The election of Carter occured IN 1976, not SINCE 1976.
-
And how is that unanimous?
-
Well gee, there's a dramatic exercise in guesswork.in my humble opinion I think Clinton would have done a better job as president then McCain or Obama will..... -
That's true. Don't want all that euroscum entering into Belarus, Ukraine and Russia.
However, Belarus, Ukraine and Russia *are* in Europe. And so is border control between the EU and those countries.
Mexico isn't in Europe. That's why it works.mainland europe has the schengen agreement where there is no border control between certain eu member states (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Greece, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden) it works just fine. imagine that.
maid
in Off Topic
Posted