OldUser

If your house is the primary residence, you cannot use it as an asset for I-864

I don't believe it does. You mean I-864 asks for this information?

What's the status of I-765? I think it's more important for EAD.

That's my impression based on OP's messages so far. E.g. they didn't get vaccinations required when doing DS-3025 And/or is the focal point of this thread as far as I understand. Most civil surgeons don't honor or. They either do whole medical with vaccinations or turn people away.

By that you mean I-693 right? A civil surgeon needs to administer missing required vaccines and sign it off

Why don't you ask a civil surgeon why they don't do it and post their answer here? I can see why they don't want to do forms with missing parts which can be filled with anything later... So they want to do the form as a whole. If there were different forms for vaccinations and medical exam, I think they'd be more ready to sign only the vaccination part. This question gets asked periodically on VJ. I'm just saying what I observed. Maybe signing off only vaccinations doesn't make financial sense to medical professionals. If the entire exam is $500, they won't be charging a small amount for smaller job, it's not worth their time.

Majority of civil surgeons in the US (I think that's what you mean by doctor) will want you to complete entire medical again. You cannot tell them otherwise, they're not going to sign off other doctor's paperwork and risk their license. Some may do only vaccination part as you want, but it's very rare. Here is where to find civil surgeons: https://www.uscis.gov/tools/find-a-civil-surgeon

Very unlikely it's going to affect you at all. You'll only have a welcome leaflet from new president.

This is normal. You can see some submitted evidence that got scanned.

Yes, you cannot send AOS packet without medical anymore.

Depends on area and civil surgeon, but I'd think around $500 on average.

Yes, you'll need another medical if you are missing some vaccinations. They can be administered during the exam. Without I-693, your I-485 will be rejected.

Beggers are not choosers... Immigration is a privilege, not a right. We can complain as much as we want, but the reason this thread's participants recommend holding off WoM is because it has a high chance of being dismissed.

I haven't heard of this lately. The study material is available online: https://www.uscis.gov/citizenship/find-study-materials-and-resources

How do you know the interview was waived? If it's through chat with Emma / calling USCIS I'd still be prepared to go to interview. The only time you know for sure the interview is waived, is when you get GC approved. Before that - anything is possible

What is it for?

Visas could be revoked in the past, and even when not revoked, DHS could tell CBP not to let a person in. Looks like it's about closing avenues for disputing such discretionary decision.

You're not a preparer or enterpreter. Usually a lawyer and translator would complete these. You can leave these blank. It's normal to be filling forms together. Just make sure your significant othet understand everything you're writing and knows the facts for interview.

Lawyers who work in immigration often mention this. And this is logical. Some countries are known to be a threat to US security, or higher on fraud. USCIS and other agencies working on background check have to dig deeper to ensure the individual is safe to be granted the ultimate immigration benefit - US citizenship, which is difficult to revoke. You can watch YouTube video of USCIS director herself talking about security and other things: Sadly, it is the reality. A Pakistani or Syrian national would probably have to wait longer for security checks as opposed to Italian and Danish. The latter are generally safer in the eyes of US immigration and their police / security cooperates much better with US providing information on individual.

Most likely you're going to be OK, as long as marriage was legitimate. Of course, it IO found some fraud indicators, such as quick divorce after entering the US and getting GC, they have to dig deeper to see if it was a sham marriage. I would have brought a lawyer with me for this interview.. If fraud is found, USCIS can go as far as trying to take your GC away. Good luck and keep us posted.

Nothing with USCIS is failsafe...

Nice, thanks for the update here!

Essentially, at best USCIS ignores the problems and denies it. At worst, they hide data and become more obscure. For example, when I filed I-751, I could look up processing timer per each individual service center and field office. Now when you go to https://egov.uscis.gov/processing-times/, you can only filter by "All service centers" and "All field offices". Essentially, the details are being hidden. I wonder if it's because of large differences. Some offices and service centers had 2+ year estimated time difference compared to others...

I-94 can also work https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/

Congratulations!