luck4unme

Sorry but I think this is a strange view to have. I could understand letting your wife and daughter go alone to some really violent unstable country is odd. To Disneyland, not so odd. You don’t need “help” to be “shown around” or to survive Disneyland, trust me, I’ve done it alone with a kid and can certainly also understand why a spouse would want to avoid it!! It’s also a very expensive way to spend a few days of something you don’t want to do.

The tourist visa would be the correct visa to use to visit the US. Doing a spousal or other immigrant visa would be incorrect if you do not intend to live in the US as your permanent residence.
 
If the child is a USC, then she doesn't need a visa (just a passport).
Your wife needs to qualify on her and show her ties to return home. It is whatever it is...the only way to know if she will be approved is to apply. Good luck.

The fact of being married to a USC does not preclude anyone from being eligible for a tourist visa, it just means that there will be more scrutiny on the applicant because having a USC spouse means the applicant has a strong tie to the US. It is the applicant's job to prove that they do not have intent to immigrate and have strong ties to the country where they currently reside and intend to return there.

Why are you not going with them?
 
Seems odd you would allow your wife and her daughter to travel to a new country for the first time, to 'visit attractions' and not want to be there with them?
 
If I was the CO interviewing her I would think it was suspicious.
 
To be honest if she has no job its a 99% denial anyway.

I don't think it is a 99% denial. She owns property. 
 
Why would you judge someone for not going on a vacation? Disney is crazy and unless so have a lot of energy, it is not a vacation but work of being in lines and lines and a lot of people. Maybe he does not want to go through the stress and also, it is a lot of money to spend on a "non-holiday".