Wilerao59

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

The above stated statements are so true and correct. Whenever there is an issue or seems an issue then a supervisory review is mandatory which could take either five minutes or five months, depending upon when IO gives the file to the supervisor to review or when supervisor pays attention and gets time to review it. It's just a guessing game in which I was myself struck many years ago when I was being naturalized. My application needed a supervisory review and it took them 3 months just to see a little irrelevant "issue" to review. I strongly believe that IO either forgot to give my file to the supervisor or purposely didn't give my file to the supervisor on time because officer wasn't friendly or nice with me at all. Officer even called me three times after the interview in one week just to admit something that never happened. She was totally weird and strange with me during the entire time interview occurred. Tried to intimidate me, but I sticked to my truth and didn't get intimidated at all. I got oath letter only when I kept calling to USCIS on their toll free number and requested them to status check. I believe that my file could have not touched at all if I had not bugged them over the phone to do status check.
Having said this, nobody can tell when you guys would hear from USCIS. It's just a guessing game.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.

I do not think that officer's action/behavior was wrong because- (1) one can not expect every officer to be kind, professional, humble and to be the one we prefer him/her to be. Keep it remember that each person is different and his/her modus operandi differs too. So can't and shouldn't blame the officer if he was different than "typical' officers that we hear on here by others who have gone to their interview; (2) OP did make so many statements to the officer which would have made anyone to be suspicious on the OP's marriage, and do not forget that OP must have received green card or must have filed her citizenship application based on marrying to a US citizen. So obviously, officer has all the right to grill her and suspect her if something does seem fishy. I'm not an officer not an attorney, but given OP's statements I myself doubt on OP's marriage. For example- there is nothing wrong to file a tax return separately despite of being happily married but parties can not expect everything to be in their nest. In OP's case, they haven't filed tax returned together as jointly because her husband is claimed as a dependent on her parents' returns. Tax returns are very important documents when it comes to immigration, but in OP's situation- they want to keep everything in their favor. They want her husband to be kept claimed as a dependent on his parents' tax returns and they also expect immigration to not be suspicious on their situation?? They want to expect everything in their favor.
Further, officer rightly asked why OP is not supporting her husband because a marriage means living and taking care of each other. Moreover, it makes situation more suspicious that her husband is a student and is being taken care of by his parents while wife loves traveling too often to Canada. Even though Canada is right off the bat, but it does cost money. She could have spent that money for her husband than letting him taking cared by his parents.
Whenever someone filed for a citizenship, he/she is asking immigration to review the entire immigration journey of them. So whatever questions officer asked were right and under the guidelines. Just because OP didn't get her case approved right off the bat or officer asked so many questions about her marriage and got suspicious doesn't mean officer was bad or unprofessional. He was just doing his job what he gets paid for. I would have done the same given the statements made by the OP. Now officer will ask supervisory review on OP's case. They would scrutinize her travels outside the US and might also her marriage situations. They MAY ask some other documents to get convinced of the bonafide of her marriage and eventually would approve her application. I had a very tough black lady officer when I was interviewed many years back. She gave the run of my application and was trying to put the words in my mouth to accept something which was not true. She even sat on my application for 3 months and called a few times to make me admit which wasn't true but finally she had no choice just to approve it. Officer knew that I would file the motion to reconsider my application if she would deny my case and then my case be reviewed by another officer. And she also knew that I could have taken the matter to courts. However, I do know that many officers don't care of your options; rather they purposely deny you but most supervisors don't act like this.
I think OP should just wait and do not assume anything at this time. In the end, everything will be just fine.