JohnR!

They weren't even in the no-gun list. No 2nd. amendment rights were harmed during the committing of this terrorist act; or that in Colorado Springs, Charleston, Aurora, Newtown, etc...

I would disagree. They are not pro-America. They are very much against everything America stands for, so much so they insist on spreading ISIS propaganda for free on this site.

I'm sorry, did you say call boyfriend? Call who's boyfriend? If you are referring to me I believe this is a personal attack.
Secondly, I find it amazing how a lot of people in this section is so pro-America, posting a thread about killing Muslims is acceptable while ignoring America's homegrown crimes and domestic terrorism.
Everything is A OK as long as you are killed by an American or an American kills you. Logic fail.
Funny, many of you stayed clear of the Planned Parenthood attack. Truth of the matter, we are more in danger from domestic terrorist than international terrorist.

Fact remains that, for the J.Crew, one bad alleged Muslim is enough to condemn an entire population, while Christian terrorism gets a pass. You can't take these people seriously...

Fact remains that, for the J.Crew, one bad alleged Muslim is enough to condemn an entire population, while Christian terrorism gets a pass. You can't take these people seriously...

We can be divided, but when we start coming up with things like Muslim registries and that idea starts getting support, the line has been crossed.

InfoWars is always good for a laugh or two. Assuming that the apparent screen shot is 100% legit then at least one of dead victims of the San Bernardino attack had information about the terrorists that should have been reported to the authorities. Reported prior to the attack. Apparently that was not done if we assume that the screen shot and what it contains is true. Why not?

It's actually a larger campaign. I know you're busy. Read up on it when you have time. It's an attack on the ideology of the terrorists.

That's what the terrorists are banking on. Nothing ISIS wants more than an absolute divide. Start treating regular Muslims like criminals and we are doing their work for them. Every step we take down that road makes it easier that much easier for ISIS.

The guy calling him out is also Muslim. In response to the "Allah shamed" comment, I think it's "shame the individual". He is calling out the attackers ideology.
For those people who always say they want to see "regular" Muslims condemning these actions, that's what this guy yelling is doing. Right in the guy's face too.

I give Obama a year or so at best.

So it's more of a gun for shooting elementary school students with than big game?

The supreme court has given a different opinion. And according to that, some of the militia is not well regulated.
the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html

we should probably just start calling any planned attack terrorism. deal? when can we get to the part where someone explains to me how we can bomb our way out of religious extremism?

But in this case, no one talked about racism, except you. So does that mean you're one of those people?

Those weren't much better, they still moved fast, just only at night. I'm a NOTLD kind of dude, slow and stupid. Or at least Shaun of the Dead...
Didn't say she liked it, said it was what she used.
Extreme Conservative Logic = oxymoron

:rofl:

Who said anything about race? Thought this was about religion. Don't tell me you've run out of material already?

How far do you want to go back? Can I use the Crusades as an example of Christian terrorism?

I don't think that would be a reasonable assumption. There simply isn't enough support for that type of action, even on the Dems side.