Jump to content
doc_cute

Should immigration be legalised and faster to stop illegal immigration ?

123 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted
Simple. By making racism a punishable crime. Be it to someone black, white, asian, alien etc..

You're right! That is SOOOO simple!

That's why it wprked for murder, theft, and "ahem" illegal immigration! Thanks so much for pointing out the simple solution to all of societies problems.

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Simple. By making racism a punishable crime. Be it to someone black, white, asian, alien etc..

You're right! That is SOOOO simple!

That's why it wprked for murder, theft, and "ahem" illegal immigration! Thanks so much for pointing out the simple solution to all of societies problems.

:lol:

Posted
Making racism illegal works overseas.

How? There's no racism overseas?

The ONLY speech which requires constitutional protection is offensive speech. Speech which offends nobody is safe to utter even in the most repressive totalitarian state. I support free speech, knowing, in fact relishing, the fact that it includes the right of people to espouse very offensive ideas, even racism.

If we make it illegal to, for example, claim that group A is racially inferior to group B, then we also remove the opportunity to rebut such claims in open debate in the free marketplace of ideas and facts. If everybody knows it's illegal to claim group A is racially inferior to group B, then the absence of credible claims is not evidence of racial equality, but is evidence of effective government censorship. And people will secretly whisper, "Why is it that group A needs a law to keep people from pointing out their inferiority"?

No, I'd rather let the bigots identify themselves publically, so that their ideas can be shot down equally publically.

04 Apr, 2004: Got married

05 Apr, 2004: I-130 Sent to CSC

13 Apr, 2004: I-130 NOA 1

19 Apr, 2004: I-129F Sent to MSC

29 Apr, 2004: I-129F NOA 1

13 Aug, 2004: I-130 Approved by CSC

28 Dec, 2004: I-130 Case Complete at NVC

18 Jan, 2005: Got the visa approved in Caracas

22 Jan, 2005: Flew home together! CCS->MIA->SFO

25 May, 2005: I-129F finally approved! We won't pursue it.

8 June, 2006: Our baby girl is born!

24 Oct, 2006: Window for filing I-751 opens

25 Oct, 2006: I-751 mailed to CSC

18 Nov, 2006: I-751 NOA1 received from CSC

30 Nov, 2006: I-751 Biometrics taken

05 Apr, 2007: I-751 approved, card production ordered

23 Jan, 2008: N-400 sent to CSC via certified mail

19 Feb, 2008: N-400 Biometrics taken

27 Mar, 2008: Naturalization interview notice received (NOA2 for N-400)

30 May, 2008: Naturalization interview, passed the test!

17 June, 2008: Naturalization oath notice mailed

15 July, 2008: Naturalization oath ceremony!

16 July, 2008: Registered to vote and applied for US passport

26 July, 2008: US Passport arrived.

Posted (edited)
Unfortunately the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that free speech is limited despite the absolute wording in the first amendment.

Can you think of any specific cases? I'm geniunely interested here, I did a quick search and I could find cases of the opposite where the Supreme Court upheld free speech rights, for example the Supreme Court ruling that the KKK could sponsor a highway cleanup sign!

Schenk v. US (1919) is the first speech case where the Court ruled speech is not absolute. This is established the clear and present danger doctrine (Can;t yell fire in a crowded theater). it was extended by Dennis v. US (1951). And again modified with Brandenberg v. Ohio (a loosening of the previous cases, but still allowing restriction). Roth v. US and Miller v California both agree that obsenity is not protected speech.

There are many cases that do uphold speech (Tinker v. DesMoines, Cohen V California, Texas v Johnson) but these rulings keep the original intent of the court that speech is not absolute.

Justice Hugo Black was on the Court from 1937 to 1971 (i think) and he was the staunchest advocate of an absolute stand on free speech. "Congress shal pass no law" meant Congress can pass NO law, but he was in the minority among justices.

Edited by mybackpages

erfoud44.jpg

24 March 2009 I-751 received by USCIS

27 March 2009 Check Cashed

30 March 2009 NOA received

8 April 2009 Biometric notice arrived by mail

24 April 2009 Biometrics scheduled

26 April 2009 Touched

...once again waiting

1 September 2009 (just over 5 months) Approved and card production ordered.

Posted

What's with the linking of racism and illegal immigration? More liberal guilt? Immigrants can be any race. When I look at people I don't see race. I wish liberals would step up and do the same.

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

-you know who

"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies."

Senator Barack Obama
Senate Floor Speech on Public Debt
March 16, 2006



barack-cowboy-hat.jpg
90f.JPG

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
What's with the linking of racism and illegal immigration? More liberal guilt? Immigrants can be any race. When I look at people I don't see race. I wish liberals would step up and do the same.

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

-you know who

Hehehe reminds me of the Colbert Report.

Posted (edited)
What's with the linking of racism and illegal immigration?

No its called an evolution of a thread. I know you probably don't believe in evolution, but sometimes threads change from their original topic to something else. Ever had a conversation for more than 30 mins? Notice how the topic tends to not be about the same thing?

If you read this thread you'll see that nobody actually made any link between racism and immigration.

More liberal guilt? Immigrants can be any race. When I look at people I don't see race. I wish liberals would step up and do the same.

HA! I get it now. You're doing an impression of Stephen Colbert right? Good one. ;)

Edited by Dr_LHA
Posted
What's with the linking of racism and illegal immigration? More liberal guilt? Immigrants can be any race. When I look at people I don't see race. I wish liberals would step up and do the same.

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

-you know who

Hehehe reminds me of the Colbert Report.

Steven Colbert :lol: He doesn't see race. People tell him he is a white man and he believes them because he has a late night tv show!

erfoud44.jpg

24 March 2009 I-751 received by USCIS

27 March 2009 Check Cashed

30 March 2009 NOA received

8 April 2009 Biometric notice arrived by mail

24 April 2009 Biometrics scheduled

26 April 2009 Touched

...once again waiting

1 September 2009 (just over 5 months) Approved and card production ordered.

Posted
Simple. By making racism a punishable crime. Be it to someone black, white, asian, alien etc..

You're right! That is SOOOO simple!

That's why it wprked for murder, theft, and "ahem" illegal immigration! Thanks so much for pointing out the simple solution to all of societies problems.

No your right. Why have any laws at all then...

I mean what would I know coming from the world's most livable city and country for that matter. The 'audacity' to dare suggest a different approach. What an idiot I am, much like the founders of this nation who first thought up of this stupid concept of America actually being it's own governed nation.. :whistle:

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Posted
Its unconstitutional for the government to limit free speech, and that includes racism. Its not about being "for" or "against" racism, its about whether you support laws that limit people's constitutional rights to free speech. Once they ban racism, what's next? Sent to jail for blasphemy? For criticising the President?

If you don't like the right to free speech that the consitution gives, then I would suggest you don't like America. The constitution is woven into the fabric of life here.

Freedom has a price, and that price is having to put up with people who's opinions disgust you. As the phrase goes "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Unfortunately the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that free speech is limited despite the absolute wording in the first amendment. and I suspect most Americans would not take an absolute postion on speech. I've struggled with this myself, but i keep coming back to the fact that there is no good reason to limit speech.

A civilized society has to draw the line somewhere. Otherwise what would stop people like pedophiles from saying disgusting things about children, to children. There are millions of examples. Nothing to do with banning free speech or even limiting free speech but more about drawing the line and setting boundaries.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Simple. By making racism a punishable crime. Be it to someone black, white, asian, alien etc..

You're right! That is SOOOO simple!

That's why it wprked for murder, theft, and "ahem" illegal immigration! Thanks so much for pointing out the simple solution to all of societies problems.

298995851_9ea83a8375.jpg

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

24 June 2007: Leaving day/flying to Dallas-Fort Worth

Posted (edited)

On the racism side of things I have included a UK act for some of the skeptical..

http://www.cre.gov.uk/legal/rra.html

Edited by Infidel

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
On the racism side of things I have included a UK act for the skeptical English compadres..

http://www.cre.gov.uk/legal/rra.html

I ought to pass that on to my colleagues at work who still use words like 'P@ki' and 'Pol@ck'. Yeah, they can be sorta racist sometimes. But they're British, and racism's illegal! I ought to sic the cops on them. :devil:

24 June 2007: Leaving day/flying to Dallas-Fort Worth

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...