Jump to content
HopeDakota

Arrest History - Documents Unavailable

9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

This is my first post here but I've been doing a lot of snooping on the forums recently - very helpful.

My Japanese boyfriend is applying for a B2 tourist visa to visit my family (and me) in the USA. He unfortunately isn't able to use ESTA due to an arrest (over 10 years ago) and court record for a speeding traffic ticket (3 or so years ago).

We've obtained the court report for his speeding ticket and will have it translated - not a problem.

The stickler is the arrest 10 years ago was connected with suspected theft. All charges were dropped and the police didn't file it with the court - so there are no available documents. He attempted to obtain a police certificate (shows all police activity) but you need a letter from a government agency or the like stating why it's needed. Apparently in Japan you aren't allowed to request information on your own crimes except from the courts (but, again, it never made it there so they have no record). I called the US Embassy in Tokyo and they told me they couldn't provide him with a police certificate request document until such information was deemed necessary at his interview. Bummer.

He will be very candid and detailed about the incident at the interview: he had just moved to Tokyo; he found a bicycle on the street with no lock that appeared old and abandoned (common in Tokyo since it costs money to dispose of bicycles); he (stupidly) borrowed it with intent to return it later to the same place; he was stopped and questioned by the police in regards to the bicycle (also common in Japan - it's happened to many of my friends); he answered honestly that he'd found it, believed it abandoned and was just using it with intent on returning it to the place he found it; turns out that the bike was still registered to an owner; he went with the police to return it to the owner; the police took down his statement/picture/fingerprints and let him go (no bail, no charges, no conviction, no fines, no court record).

But since it could be viewed as a a CIMT we're worried he will be found inadmissible due to the arrest even without a charge. The trip is really just small stuff; we were hoping to eventually live in the US down the road if we get engaged (K1 visa and all that).

I was wondering if anyone has any helpful tips, ideas for documents we could bring (since we can't obtain the police certificate or documentation regarding the arrest yet), and maybe some words of encouragement or caution - any tidbits of wisdom are greatly appreciated.

Many thanks ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

~Removed the other duplicate topic per poster's request~

VJ Moderation


 

 



07/09/2008: F-1 Interview - Successful
05/01/2013: (L) Married (L)

AOS from F-1:
07/09/2013: AOS package (I-130/I-485/I-756/I-131) fedexed
09/25/2013: AOS Interview with my husband at Milwaukee, WI
03/03/2014: AOS Approved

I-751 Removal of Conditions:

11/13/2015: Received reminder notice dated 11/08 from USCIS to apply for ROC
Day 00 - 12/04/2015: Mailed I-751 package to CSC via USPS Priority Mail
Day 03 - 12/07/2015: I-751 package delivered
Day 05 - 12/09/2015: Check cashed
Day 07 - 12/11/2015: NOA1 received dated 12/07/15
Day 22 - 12/26/2015: Biometric appointment notice received dated 12/19/15
Day 35 - 01/08/2016: Biometric appointment

Day 235 - 07/26/2016: Approved (E-notification of Card Production)

Day 238 - 07/29/2016: Status changed to 'Card Was Mailed to Me'

Day 241 - 08/01/2016: CSC returned original docs that were submitted at the time of application.

Day 241 - 08/01/2016: New status update 'Card was picked up by the United States Postal Service' Priority Mail 2-Day with tracking number provided.

Day 243 - 08/03/2016: Received 10 year Green Card

Day 255 - 08/15/2016: Received NOA2 with approval dated 07/26/2016

Click here for a sample of my cover letter, list of evidence, package assembly & shipping box

Click here for a sample of my I-751 notarized affidavit from a friend

 

 

N-400 Naturalization:

12/03/2016: Eligible

Day 00: 12/12/2016 Mailed N-400 to Phoenix, AZ lockbox via USPS Priority Express

Day 01: 12/13/2016 N-400 application delivered

Day 03: 12/15/2016 Credit card charged

Day 07: 12/19/2016 Text & e-mail notification received with a NBC receipt #

Day 11: 12/23/2016 NOA received via mail with priority date 12/13/16

Day 16: 12/28/2016 Received E-mail notification reg. biometrics scheduling

Day 19: 12/31/2016 Received Biometric notice via mail with notice date 12/24/2016

Day 32: 01/13/2017 Biometric appointment

Day 53: 02/03/2017 Received e-mail notification stating I am "in line" for interview scheduling

Day 144: 05/05/2017 Filed an e-request that interview notice was not yet mailed to me

Day 148: 05/09/2017 Received e-mail notification that interview has been scheduled after being in line for 95 days

Day 151: 05/12/2017 Received N-400 Interview notice via USPS

Day 183: 06/13/2017 N-400 Interview at USCIS Milwaukee, WI field office (Approved!) ***To read about my interview experience, click here***

Day 192: 06/22/2017 Received e-mail notification stating I am placed in line for oath ceremony

Day 206: 07/06/2017 Received e-mail notification stating oath ceremony notice was mailed

Day 210: 07/10/2017 Received oath ceremony notice (N-445) via USPS

Day 227: 07/27/2017 Oath Ceremony at Milwaukee, WI!

Dual citizen (France & U.S.A) / OCI card holder

 

Day 00: 07/27/2017 U.S. passport application at Milwaukee, WI (routine processing)

Day 05: 08/01/2017 Passport application locator number provided

Day 06: 08/02/2017 Checks cashed

Day 12: 08/08/2017 Received 2 e-mails stating that passport processing is over and it has been mailed with tracking # provided

Day 15: 08/11/2017 Received passport book via Priority Mail

Day 18: 08/14/2017 Received passport card via First Class Mail

Day 22: 08/18/2017 Received naturalization certificate back via Priority Mail / Updated citizenship status with SSA
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need a copy of the I-160 and the NOA2. He can then go get his Police Certificate.

Please fill out a timeline when you get a chance.


 
12/31/2015 - New Year's Eve 2015 Engagement
03/19/2016 - I-129F Package sent via Express Mail (Cashier's Check)

03/21/2016 - Notice of Receipt (Text/Email)

03/24/2016 - NOA1 Approval :dancing:

06/13/2016 - NOA2 Approval :dancing:

07/13/2016 - NVC Case received and Case # Assigned. YES!!!! :dancing:

07/19/2016 - K-1 document package arrives Tokyo, Japan Consulate

07/22/2016 - Packet 3 Received and Returned

08/07/2016 - Tokyo Embassy Interview...APPROVED!!! :dancing:

08/09/2016 - Passport & Visa Received from Embassy

09/29/2016 - POE San Francisco, CA

10/28/2016 - MARRIED!

11/09/2016 - AOS Package Received

11/18/2016 - Electronic I-131, I-765 NOA1, I-485 Biometrics Fee Acknowledged.

11/26/2016 - I-131, I-765 NOA1 Letters Received

11/27/2016 - I-485 NOA1 Received

12/14/2016 - Biometrics Done

02/11/2017  - RFE Recieved for EAD

02/13/2017 - Response to RFE Sent for EAD

02/21/2017 - EAD & I-131 Approved

03/01/2017 - EAD/AP Combo Card Received

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No charge, and most importantly no conviction.... what makes you think he is ineligible to use the VWP/ESTA?


CR1 / DCF (London): 2012 / 2013 (4.5 months from I-130 petition to visa in hand)

 

I-751 #1 [Denied]

 

Early May 2015 : I-751 Joint filing package sent fedex next day 09:00am from UK ($lots - thanks). 
May 2015: Notice of receipt/1yr extension received, dated day of receipt. This was forwarded to me outside the US, and no issues re-entering multiple times.
June 2015: Biometrics completed - walk in / argument, stressing proof of imminent travel and multiple prior inconvenient appointments & reschedules.
May 2016: Vermont Service Centre updated to processing May 2015 cases, therefore my case is now classed as outside normal processing time
May 2016: Service request sent (whatever that is) after calling to find out why I am still waiting after 12 months. Unable to tell me anything.
May 2016: Letter received in response, stating processing is on hold due to 'pending security checks' with no other information. Not helpful.
May 2016: (7am) - Infopass appointment for I-551 Stamp in passport.  (8am) - Returned to USCIS office for another I-551 stamp after realizing the dumbass put the expiry stamp as 2015 not 2017. Two entire passport pages wasted. Cheers. 

Oct 2016: Infopass appointment (not at local office). USCIS have sent my file to an overseas office, in a country that neither myself or my spouse have ever resided in. It has sat there untouched for five months. Why? Who knows. Internal query requesting urgent clarification is sent by USCIS officer.  
Oct 2016: An identical 'pending security check'  letter received, addressing precisely none of my or the immigration officers legitimate queries. 
Nov 2016: Infopass appointment: My file is now back in the US and at my local office...no other updates or progress. 
Jan 2017: Notification that an interview has been scheduled at a local office. Bizarrely still no RFE... 
Jan 2017: 2hr wait, then interview terminated before it began, due to moving my ID to another state 2 wks prior. New interview 'in a few months...maybe.'       Informed them that divorce proceedings are underway, but not finalised at this time. 
March 2017: An Interview was scheduled - marked as no-show as they didn't actually send out a notification of interview. FML 
April  2017: Filed an official complaint with the ombudsman, and have requested Senator & Congressman assistance - enough is enough. 
May 2017: Yet another infopass. No updates, interview of further progress. Still no response from Congressperson, Senator, or Ombudsman received. 
June 2017: 68 days after contacting them, the Ombudsman finally contacted USCIS. 'It may take up to 60 days to receive a response'.   
July 2017:  A follow up enquiry sent by Ombudsman to USCIS after receiving no response or action after 45 days. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. 
August 2017: 60 days has come and gone with no response from USCIS. Contacted the Ombudsman who will contact them AGAIN. 
August 2017: Email from Ombudsman - USCIS have scheduled an interview at the very end of August .  
August 2017: Interview - switched to a (finalised) divorce waiver. Told that decision will be made that afternoon, but no problems foreseen with my case. 
September 2017: Now 4 weeks since interview, my file has not moved from the officers desk, and no decision is showing when I call and speak to a Tier 2.  
September 2017: Request filed for Senator assistance (a different senator - maybe I will get a reply & assistance from this one?). 
October 2017: 37 days since interview....and no decision.  W, and indeed, TF is going on???? 
October 2017: Letter of Denial received - reason given as 'I-751 petition was not properly filed'. Discovered ex-spouse made false allegations to USCIS

I-751 #2 [Pending] 

October 2017: Within 72hrs of receiving denial notice, a new waiver I-751, divorce decree & $680 cheque, sent to Vermont via FedEx overnight 9am priority.  

October 2017: I-797C Receipt/extension letter received, dated day of receipt at VSC 

October 2017: Another I-551 stamp obtained at infopass appointment, as the extension letter is useless with a 2yr card that expired 2.5yrs ago! 

November 2017: Biometrics completed (early walk-in) 

2018: Re-entered US multiple times with second I-751 extension letter & stamp. Quick trip to secondary required to verify, and stamped in as normal

  

N-400 [Pending] 

February 2018: N-400 filed online.  $725 paid to the USCIS paperwork wastage fund

February 2018: Biometrics completed (walk-in)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No charge, and most importantly no conviction.... what makes you think he is ineligible to use the VWP/ESTA?

Because the question in the VWP application asks "Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime (...)? The question is whether he was really arrested. I wouldn't risk it though. If he used the VWP but wasn't eligible they might slap him later with a misrepresentation charge at the K1 interview.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the question in the VWP application asks "Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime (...)? The question is whether he was really arrested. I wouldn't risk it though. If he used the VWP but wasn't eligible they might slap him later with a misrepresentation charge at the K1 interview.

Does not matter.

The current wording is:

2) Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime that resulted in serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority?

In this case, they can truthfully answer no.

Even if you had been arrested for a crime involving serious damage to property, serious harm to another person, or a Govt. authority (aka, a Crime involving Moral Turpitude), the relevant law - in this case INA 212 (A) - states that no conviction (or caution, which is a formal admission of guilt) = no problem.

It is not arrests, but convictions that matter. Contrary to what many people think, an arrest, multiple arrests, being charged/tried and then subsequently acquitted/charges dropped, does not make you ineligible. Hell, even the webpage of the London embassy very incorrectly stated for several years that all people who had been arrested at any time needed a visa, so god knows how many people applied for a visa when they really didn't have to, or worse still, just didn't bother. They have now changed that wording to a recommendation instead of an absolute...not perfect, but an improvement.

So, in this case, the theft thing isn't an issue.

Traffic and speeding tickets are largely irrelevant and even if they weren't, that would still be a single conviction and would more than likely fall under the petty offence exception. A single conviction, with a maximum possible sentence of 1 year, and sentenced to less than 6 months in prison = no issue. Something more serious like death by dangerous driving, yes, would be an issue, but that isn't what we are talking about here.

As with most US immigration law, the devil is in the detail. INA 212 is here: https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-2006.html


CR1 / DCF (London): 2012 / 2013 (4.5 months from I-130 petition to visa in hand)

 

I-751 #1 [Denied]

 

Early May 2015 : I-751 Joint filing package sent fedex next day 09:00am from UK ($lots - thanks). 
May 2015: Notice of receipt/1yr extension received, dated day of receipt. This was forwarded to me outside the US, and no issues re-entering multiple times.
June 2015: Biometrics completed - walk in / argument, stressing proof of imminent travel and multiple prior inconvenient appointments & reschedules.
May 2016: Vermont Service Centre updated to processing May 2015 cases, therefore my case is now classed as outside normal processing time
May 2016: Service request sent (whatever that is) after calling to find out why I am still waiting after 12 months. Unable to tell me anything.
May 2016: Letter received in response, stating processing is on hold due to 'pending security checks' with no other information. Not helpful.
May 2016: (7am) - Infopass appointment for I-551 Stamp in passport.  (8am) - Returned to USCIS office for another I-551 stamp after realizing the dumbass put the expiry stamp as 2015 not 2017. Two entire passport pages wasted. Cheers. 

Oct 2016: Infopass appointment (not at local office). USCIS have sent my file to an overseas office, in a country that neither myself or my spouse have ever resided in. It has sat there untouched for five months. Why? Who knows. Internal query requesting urgent clarification is sent by USCIS officer.  
Oct 2016: An identical 'pending security check'  letter received, addressing precisely none of my or the immigration officers legitimate queries. 
Nov 2016: Infopass appointment: My file is now back in the US and at my local office...no other updates or progress. 
Jan 2017: Notification that an interview has been scheduled at a local office. Bizarrely still no RFE... 
Jan 2017: 2hr wait, then interview terminated before it began, due to moving my ID to another state 2 wks prior. New interview 'in a few months...maybe.'       Informed them that divorce proceedings are underway, but not finalised at this time. 
March 2017: An Interview was scheduled - marked as no-show as they didn't actually send out a notification of interview. FML 
April  2017: Filed an official complaint with the ombudsman, and have requested Senator & Congressman assistance - enough is enough. 
May 2017: Yet another infopass. No updates, interview of further progress. Still no response from Congressperson, Senator, or Ombudsman received. 
June 2017: 68 days after contacting them, the Ombudsman finally contacted USCIS. 'It may take up to 60 days to receive a response'.   
July 2017:  A follow up enquiry sent by Ombudsman to USCIS after receiving no response or action after 45 days. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. 
August 2017: 60 days has come and gone with no response from USCIS. Contacted the Ombudsman who will contact them AGAIN. 
August 2017: Email from Ombudsman - USCIS have scheduled an interview at the very end of August .  
August 2017: Interview - switched to a (finalised) divorce waiver. Told that decision will be made that afternoon, but no problems foreseen with my case. 
September 2017: Now 4 weeks since interview, my file has not moved from the officers desk, and no decision is showing when I call and speak to a Tier 2.  
September 2017: Request filed for Senator assistance (a different senator - maybe I will get a reply & assistance from this one?). 
October 2017: 37 days since interview....and no decision.  W, and indeed, TF is going on???? 
October 2017: Letter of Denial received - reason given as 'I-751 petition was not properly filed'. Discovered ex-spouse made false allegations to USCIS

I-751 #2 [Pending] 

October 2017: Within 72hrs of receiving denial notice, a new waiver I-751, divorce decree & $680 cheque, sent to Vermont via FedEx overnight 9am priority.  

October 2017: I-797C Receipt/extension letter received, dated day of receipt at VSC 

October 2017: Another I-551 stamp obtained at infopass appointment, as the extension letter is useless with a 2yr card that expired 2.5yrs ago! 

November 2017: Biometrics completed (early walk-in) 

2018: Re-entered US multiple times with second I-751 extension letter & stamp. Quick trip to secondary required to verify, and stamped in as normal

  

N-400 [Pending] 

February 2018: N-400 filed online.  $725 paid to the USCIS paperwork wastage fund

February 2018: Biometrics completed (walk-in)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, everyone, for your responses. I really appreciate all of the assistance and thoughtful replies.

He had already attempted ESTA at the time I had posted and checked "Yes" to the arrest/convictions box based on the Japanese translation given (and probably due to him wanting to be extra careful). But thank you so much for the specifics, mindthegap. Reading through them has put me a bit more at ease knowing that he was never charged/fined for theft and the traffic conviction should be alright.

Hopefully the interview will just be a big formality and all will go relatively smoothly. Based on the way the interview goes, I will have him ask at the interview if he is eligible for ESTA in the future and report back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not matter.

The current wording is:

2) Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime that resulted in serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority?

In this case, they can truthfully answer no.

Even if you had been arrested for a crime involving serious damage to property, serious harm to another person, or a Govt. authority (aka, a Crime involving Moral Turpitude), the relevant law - in this case INA 212 (A) - states that no conviction (or caution, which is a formal admission of guilt) = no problem.

It is not arrests, but convictions that matter. Contrary to what many people think, an arrest, multiple arrests, being charged/tried and then subsequently acquitted/charges dropped, does not make you ineligible. Hell, even the webpage of the London embassy very incorrectly stated for several years that all people who had been arrested at any time needed a visa, so god knows how many people applied for a visa when they really didn't have to, or worse still, just didn't bother. They have now changed that wording to a recommendation instead of an absolute...not perfect, but an improvement.

So, in this case, the theft thing isn't an issue.

Traffic and speeding tickets are largely irrelevant and even if they weren't, that would still be a single conviction and would more than likely fall under the petty offence exception. A single conviction, with a maximum possible sentence of 1 year, and sentenced to less than 6 months in prison = no issue. Something more serious like death by dangerous driving, yes, would be an issue, but that isn't what we are talking about here. And I know of someone who had a lawyer and he didn't catch that.

As with most US immigration law, the devil is in the detail. INA 212 is here: https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-2006.html

That is very interesting. It's a common thing in Australia to get charged with "guilty. Proven without conviction" if you are a first time offender. I think it's a little worse than a caution because you have to go to court and then get that result.

I've heard of so many people that got that charge or whatever you want to call it and were told that they can't use the VWP anymore. In addition they had to get a waiver in order to obtain a visa. I even know of someone who got a lawyer and that lawyer didn't mention that. They had to get a waiver for that.

Edited by Californiansunset

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not matter.

The current wording is:

2) Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime that resulted in serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority?

In this case, they can truthfully answer no.

Even if you had been arrested for a crime involving serious damage to property, serious harm to another person, or a Govt. authority (aka, a Crime involving Moral Turpitude), the relevant law - in this case INA 212 (A) - states that no conviction (or caution, which is a formal admission of guilt) = no problem.

It is not arrests, but convictions that matter. Contrary to what many people think, an arrest, multiple arrests, being charged/tried and then subsequently acquitted/charges dropped, does not make you ineligible. Hell, even the webpage of the London embassy very incorrectly stated for several years that all people who had been arrested at any time needed a visa, so god knows how many people applied for a visa when they really didn't have to, or worse still, just didn't bother. They have now changed that wording to a recommendation instead of an absolute...not perfect, but an improvement.

So, in this case, the theft thing isn't an issue.

Traffic and speeding tickets are largely irrelevant and even if they weren't, that would still be a single conviction and would more than likely fall under the petty offence exception. A single conviction, with a maximum possible sentence of 1 year, and sentenced to less than 6 months in prison = no issue. Something more serious like death by dangerous driving, yes, would be an issue, but that isn't what we are talking about here.

As with most US immigration law, the devil is in the detail. INA 212 is here: https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-2006.html

Just researched it. Even though you might not haben been convicted in your country (in this case Japan), you still need to consider yourself convicted under US immigration laws. You might've been subject to a pardon and not have been convicted because you were a first time offender but you would still have to answer yes to an ESTA question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×