Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Court: Union fees not mandatory for state workers

2 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Court: Union fees not mandatory for state workers

Lansing — The Michigan Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that about 35,000 state employees should have never been subject to paying union fees, giving conservative supporters of the state’s 2013 right-to-work law a major victory.

In a 4-3 decision, the high court declared unconstitutional the Michigan Civil Service Commission’s longstanding rules authorizing labor unions to collect fees from state employees as a condition of employment.

The United Auto Workers, which represents and collects dues or fees from about 17,000 state employees, challenged whether the law applied to its members because their employment terms are set by the constitutionally autonomous Civil Service Commission.

“The Civil Service Commission lacked the constitutional authority to compel civil service employees to make involuntary financial contributions to subsidize the commission’s exercise of its constitutional duties and responsibilities,” Chief Justice Robert Young Jr. wrote in the majority opinion.

The Supreme Court’s ruling clears one of the last legal challenges to the validity of 2013 law, which makes financial support of a labor union optional.

The right-to-work law, which took effect in March 2013, prohibits union contracts from requiring “fair share” fees as a condition of employment to pay for the cost of collective bargaining agreements.

The Legislature exempted unionized Michigan State Police troopers and municipal police and firefighter unions from the right-to-work law.

Justices Stephen Markman, David Viviano and Brian Zahra joined Young in the majority opinion. All four are Republican-nominated justices.

In the majority opinion, Young likened the civil service commission’s rule authorizing union agency fees to a “quasi” form of taxation or appropriation, which is the exclusive power of the Legislature.

“The commission’s rules must yield to the constitution when there is no authority for it to impose such fees,” the chief justice wrote.

GOP-nominated Justice Mary Beth Kelly wrote the dissenting opinion and was joined by Justices Bridget Mary McCormack and Richard Bernstein, who are both nominees of the Democratic Party.

Kelly said the majority’s decision breaks 75 years of legal precedent in which the bipartisan civil service commission has dictated the terms of employment for classified state workers.

“The majority’s conclusion upsets this traditional understanding of the scope of the commission’s constitutional authority to regulate the conditions of employment for employees in the classified state civil service,” she wrote.

Kelly warned that the majority could be setting a precedent that leaves other longstanding powers of the civil service commission subject to a constitutional challenge.

“The majority’s decision is an untested application of state constitutional law that may well yield unintended consequences,” Kelly wrote.

“This is another failed attempt by the unions to try to circumvent the right-to-work (law),” said Patrick Wright of the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, which argued commission-imposed union fees were akin to a tax.


If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama


Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this as well. Pretty tough on unions, they will actually have to show a worthwhile benefit to keep their members. I have worked with many union members and many of them thought the union was worthless particularly with respect to the amount of dues they had to pay.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.