GAO: Fuel tank cleanup could cost $12B

[one...two...tree 2,762]

By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer

It will cost at least $12 billion to clean up contamination from tens of thousands of gasoline storage tanks that are leaking underground, congressional auditors say.

That is far more than the $72 million that Congress and the Bush administration have provided each year, according to the report Thursday from the General Accountability Office.

The Environmental Protection Agency, which oversees the cleanups, has already spent more than $10 billion to reduce the contamination over the past 20 years caused by hundreds of thousands of leaking tanks, many of them found at gas stations and convenience stores.

Yet some 117,000 faulty tanks still await cleanups, according to the latest figures current as of September 2005.

The GAO's $12 billion estimate would pay to remove 54,000 leaks from underground storage tanks that are either abandoned or no one can be held accountable for cleaning up. Another 63,000 leaking tanks would be paid for by pump stations, store owners or other operators of the leaking tanks, along with insurers and state funds, according to the GAO.

The problem is growing, however. Forty-three states said they expect to find 16,700 new leaks in the next five years, many requiring at least some federal money for the cleanups.

The lag in cleanups isn't necessarily due to lack of money, according to the GAO.

Every time a motorist pays for a gallon of gas, a tenth of a penny goes into a trust fund to remove the contamination. The fund now has about $2.6 billion and is expected to reach $3 billion before the end of 2008. Congress created the trust fund in 1986 because of concerns about contamination from leaking tanks at gas stations, but annually only a small fraction has been appropriated for cleanups. Most has sat in the Treasury to help counter federal budget deficits.

Rep. John Dingell (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee and who released the GAO report on Thursday, called the situation an "inexplicable failure to use available resources to speed the cleanup of pollution that is likely to spread."

The failure to clean up the tank waste is "contaminating our water supplies with MTBE and other carcinogens, unnecessarily risking public health," said Rep. Hilda Solis (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., who along with Dingell had requested the report.

Leaking underground gasoline tanks for years have been blamed for much of the MTBE — or methyl tertiary-butyl ether — found in drinking water supplies in at least 36 states. More than 150 lawsuits have been filed seeking damages because of problems with MTBE, which until recently has been a widespread gasoline additive that helped curb air pollution.

The GAO report found some states' financial assurance funds lack the money to pay for timely tank cleanups. It said tank owners covered under the state programs usually pay only a small deductible when tanks leak, with the government picking up most of the tab.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 required underground storage tanks to be inspected every three years. The EPA is drafting guidelines for how the agency and states should comply with the new inspection requirements, said Susan Parker Bodine, head of EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, in a written response to the GAO report.

Only about one-third of states currently assure the EPA they are checking to see if tank owners are covered by insurance, the GAO said. Bodine said the agency also will consider studying better ways to distribute money from the trust fund and whether the state funds and insurance are effective enough.

___

On the Net:

House Energy and Commerce Committee: http://energycommerce.house.gov/

EPA: http://www.epa.gov/OUST/index.htm

[almaty 19]

whoa..let exxon and others pay for it...they made the $$$$$$$$

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

whoa..let exxon and others pay for it...they made the $$$$$$$$

Yup. But these are tanks from companies that are out of business (my educated guess).

[one...two...tree 2,762]

whoa..let exxon and others pay for it...they made the $$$$$$$$

For sure. But that means the government stop corporate welfare as we know it.

[peejay 327]

whoa..let exxon and others pay for it...they made the $$$$$$$$

Yup. But these are tanks from companies that are out of business (my educated guess).

The oil companies in the Gulf of Mexico have to set up an escrow account for every petroleum production facility they set in the water. They are required to do this in advance to pay for the eventual removal of the facility when production is depleated. This is required so the taxpayer does not have to bear the costs of removal for structures that would be hazards to navigation and environmental hazards in the event that a company goes bankrupt. Many of these facilities go through several owners, but the escrow account remains in place to protect the taxpayer.

I don't see why these gas stations and other storage facilities aren't required to do the same thing. Leaving their mess for others to pay the cleanup is unnecessary. They should be required to set up an escrow account in advance to pay for future removal and cleanup.